Channel
@arcangelesdeluz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
127subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001530372020 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arcangelesdeluz |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arcangelesdeluz |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 127 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 128 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 130 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 130 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2025 to 25 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Algunas personas están esperando una guerra apocalíptica final. Pero la guerra final se lucha no en los campos de batalla, ni en el mar, ni en los cielos arriba. Tampoco es una guerra entre líderes o naciones. La guerra final se lucha en el corazón de cada ser humano, con los ejércitos de sus acciones en este mundo. Con el milagro de la luz." Rabino Tzvi Freeman.
❤1👍1
¿𝐏𝐨𝐫 𝐪𝐮𝐞́ 𝐬𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐪𝐮𝐞 "𝐥𝐚 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐦𝐧𝐢𝐚 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐚 𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐬: 𝐚𝐥 𝐪𝐮𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐚, 𝐚𝐥 𝐪𝐮𝐞 𝐞𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐜𝐡𝐚 𝐲 𝐚𝐥 𝐪𝐮𝐞 𝐞𝐬 𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐝𝐨"? Porque si hablamos mal de alguien, hablamos en contra de la fuerza misma que nos creó y nos sustenta. Esa fuerza es lo único que existe. Por eso, al calumniar, dañamos el sistema de conexión, la estructura más profunda de la naturaleza a la que todos pertenecemos. Esto no aplica a la crítica en asuntos prácticos com…
❤1
Video, posted without a caption
Audio de Day De Los Angeles אלד
Photo, posted without a caption
25 días del Omer: Cuarta semana, Cuarto día NÉTZAJ DE NÉTZAJ La Victoria de la Determinación La fuerza especial de Nétzaj de Nétzaj es hacernos capaces de soportar los obstáculos de la vida. Logramos la felicidad si sabemos enfrentar la adversidad. Job es, probablemente, el ideal de Nétzaj de Nétzaj. Imaginamos tolerar ciertos problemas, pero no los problemas graves. Cuando aparecen los problemas graves es cuando t…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Audio de Day De Los Angeles אלד
Photo, posted without a caption
24 días del Omer: Cuarta semana, Tercer día TIFÉRET DE NÉTZAJ Armonía en la Determinación Existen personas que en ocasiones nos hablan sin freno y nos desequilibran fácilmente. Debemos escuchar, incluso a quienes nos impacientan. La determinación de Nétzaj debe ser equilibrada y no debe ser egoísta. Nuestra determinación no debe dañar a los demás. Debo ayudar para que el otro alcance la armonía. El egoísmo puede se…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @arcangelesdeluz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Arcangelesdeluz www.arcangelesdeluz.com” (@arcangelesdeluz), 127 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arcangelesdeluz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.