Акк неактивен уже месяцев 8 на фанвью, там даже фотка другой модели висит. Хз в чем прикол этих типов, лень отписываться или что 🤣 Интересно, много кто еще остался работать на данной платформе или перешли на Stacked/Telegram/другое?
🔥6❤2😁2

Channel
@arbiiitrage_ua
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,484subscribers
-128 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001215079462 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arbiiitrage_ua |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arbiiitrage_ua |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 15,484 | -8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 15,492 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:48 | 15,494 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:43 | 15,493 | +8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 15,485 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 15,488 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 15,483 | -12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 15,495 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 15,498 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 15,504 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 15,500 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 15,512 | -8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 15,520 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 15,529 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 15,534 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 15,531 | -12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 15,543 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 15,548 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 15,551 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 15,561 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (18 June 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 23,170 |
| Reactions total | 174 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
586 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 207 | 35.3% | |
| 🔥 | 201 | 34.3% | |
| 👍 | 115 | 19.6% | |
| 😁 | 37 | 6.31% | |
| 🫡 | 8 | 1.37% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 1.02% | |
| 👨💻 | 5 | 0.853% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.512% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.341% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 0.341% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 586 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @arbiiitrage_ua. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 June 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Акк неактивен уже месяцев 8 на фанвью, там даже фотка другой модели висит. Хз в чем прикол этих типов, лень отписываться или что 🤣 Интересно, много кто еще остался работать на данной платформе или перешли на Stacked/Telegram/другое?
🔥6❤2😁2
🪴Я сторонник залива ручками, тем более большую часть аккаунтов веду в долгосрок, ну их в принципе не так уж и много. Но когда хочется получать намного больше трафика, то на дело приходят подобные софты. Очень удобная штука, понравилась. Спустя какое-то время сообщу результаты что из этого вышло заливая на ИИ модели. Кстати, интересно еще вам под тикток похожий софт?
❤27🙏6👍4👾2😁1
📈 Вот пара примеров вирусных роликов, сделанных через Seedance 2.0. Но вас же сразу интересует цифры? Сколько они приносят сложно сказать, ведь у них цель одна - залутать дохуя просмотров. Все они 10-30М+. Что-то по любому есть на балансах) 💡Суть поста в другом: показать, как круто люди умеют воплощать свои идеи в реальность. Мне в лс до сих пор сыпятся вопросы: «бля, 200 просмотров потолок, че делать?». Ответы все…
🔥61❤10👍10😁2🌚1
Лето, два валета Времени на ведение канала очень не хватает. Про ютуб вообще молчу 🤭 Всё уходит на работу и иногда на отдых, ножки то хочется помочить в водичке) Сейчас основной фокус направлен на тг-каналы по ИИ-моделям, их пока что 3 шт. Работы там предостаточно: генерация контента, трафик, придумывание креативов, чаттинг и тд Помимо ИИшных, взял еще и ведение живых, тоже на телегу. Здесь конечно немного попроще…
🔥12🫡8❤3
Был период в инсте (пару недель назад) когда вообще по просмотрам было грустно. И обычные рилсы и триалы, ну в реки херово летело. Сейчас вроде как все гуд, вернулось на свои места, охваты как раньше. Хотя тогда даже при маленьких просмотрах удавалось оставаться на том же уровне заработка. Как оно так устроено хз, потому что сама аудитория не изменилась. А скажите, относительно недавно были ли у вас траблы какие-то и…
🫂НАБОР В КОМАНДУ ПО ОНЛИКУ В лс много поступало запросов на счет работы. Снова появилась такая возможность, поэтому ознакамливайтесь с условиями и заполняйте заявку. И внимательно отвечаем на вопросики 📝https://forms.gle/bYuABQvYmjGuZi4u9
❤13👍2😁2
🎥🎬 Замечаю в ленте рекомендаций как больше появляется ИИ моделей, с воронкой увода людей на тг каналы. Единственное отличие между всеми акками – только внешность девочки. Креативы абсолютно одинаковые. Все повторяют друг за другом, оно и понятно почему, потому что это типо «работает». Уникальности очень мало. А затем летят в чаты и жалуются на просмотры и спрашивают как пофиксить, ну это касается новичков. Главный н…
❤18👍7
🤚Ребзи, опросик
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥 Подъехала приятная инфа для тех, кто планирует работать на платформе Stacked Если акк зареган по вшитой линке выше и вы уже пробили отметку баланса в 30$ — пишите в лс, для красивого визуала сделают вам накрутку по лайкам и официальную галочку на профиль ✅
👍9🔥3
🍒 КРАТКИЙ ГАЙД ЧТО СЕЙЧАС АКТУАЛЬНО в AI OFM: 🔴Генерация SFW фото: – GPT-image 2 – Nano Banana 2 – Grok (кому-то нравится он, но лично не юзаю) 🔴Генерация SFW видео : – Воркфлоу по типу Kiara/Animator 2.5 или тот, что отправлял выше – Kling motion control – Seedance 2.0 🔴Генерация NSFW 18+ фото: – Wan 2.7 Pro Edit – Seedream 4.5 – Воркфлоу (мб Krea2) 🔴Генерация NSFW 18+ видео: – Seedance 2.0 🔴 Источники трафи…
❤26🔥11👍5
File, posted without a caption
🔥6
Posted without readable text
👍9🤝2❤1🌚1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @arbiiitrage_ua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤚Ребзи, опросик
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Записки Арбитражника ✍🏻” (@arbiiitrage_ua), 15,484 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arbiiitrage_ua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.