International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 42 days, net +43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,097–14,216 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 10:39
14,202
+91
14 Sept 2026, 07:01
14,111
-4
10 Sept 2026, 15:16
14,115
-4
7 Sept 2026, 12:17
14,119
-5
4 Sept 2026, 13:00
14,124
-2
2 Sept 2026, 21:05
14,126
+3
1 Sept 2026, 18:47
14,123
-1
31 Aug 2026, 16:44
14,124
-1
29 Aug 2026, 14:55
14,125
-1
28 Aug 2026, 16:53
14,126
-1
26 Aug 2026, 18:21
14,127
-1
25 Aug 2026, 21:33
14,128
-4
25 Aug 2026, 00:54
14,132
-4
23 Aug 2026, 11:53
14,136
-4
21 Aug 2026, 23:58
14,140
-2
20 Aug 2026, 21:16
14,142
-1
19 Aug 2026, 21:34
14,143
+2
18 Aug 2026, 21:03
14,141
-5
16 Aug 2026, 15:38
14,146
-5
14 Aug 2026, 20:48
14,151
first reading
Engagement
229 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.44%
avg views ÷ 14,202 subscribers
Avg views / post
204
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 229 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 45 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
229 (4 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
9,200
Reactions total
54
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 19:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
591 reactions across 174 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
236
39.9%
🤬
148
25.0%
🔥
77
13.0%
👍
41
6.94%
👎
28
4.74%
👏
25
4.23%
😭
13
2.20%
🤣
10
1.69%
😁
9
1.52%
😨
3
0.508%
🤔
1
0.169%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 174 of the 229 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 591 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 229 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 الحرس الثوري يهاجم قاعدة أمريكية في أربيل بإقليم كردستان العراق
🔻 الضربة الإيرانية استهدفت قاعدة أمريكية و أدت إلى تدمير مخازن للمعدات و مركز صيانة
🔻 كما طالت نقطة تحكم بمنطاد استطلاع استخباري و أشعلت خزانات الوقود
🔻 المعطيات الواردة تشير أيضا إلى سقوط قتلى في صفوف العسكريين الأمريكيين
@arabwar
مسيّرات رخيصة بدل السلاح النووي؟
🔻 مع تزايد فعالية المسيّرات الهجومية الروسية، لم يعد التهديد بالسلاح النووي ضرورياً لإجبار الخصم على استنزاف دفاعاته. فمئات المسيّرات في موجة واحدة قادرة على إغراق منظومات الدفاع الجوي، واستنزاف الصواريخ الاعتراضية وضرب البنية التحتية الحيوية.
🔻 وهنا تتحول المسيّرات الرخيصة، رغم عدم ارتباطها بالسلاح النووي، إلى أداة ذات تأثير استراتيجي: ليس المطلوب تدمير الدولة بالكامل، بل إجبارها …
🔥 تحذير إيراني مزدوج: أي هجوم جديد سيقابل برد أثقل بكثير
🔻 هيئة الأركان الإيرانية و مقر خاتم الأنبياء قالا إن واشنطن تواصل استخدام أراضي و أجواء دول في المنطقة لضرب إيران رغم التحذيرات السابقة
🔻 طهران أكدت أنها تحترم سيادة الجوار لكنها لن تتسامح مع أي عدوان و أن الحرس الثوري و الجيش سيضربان مصدر أي هجوم بقوة ساحقة
🔻 الرسالة الإيرانية ذهبت أبعد من الردع المباشر: من يسهّل الهجوم الأميركي عليه أن يحسب نفسه داخل المعا…
🔴 اشتباكات مسلحة على أطراف السويداء بين القوات الحكومية السورية و مجموعات درزية محلية
🔻 تقارير محلية تتحدث عن استمرار تبادل إطلاق النار غرب مدينة السويداء
🔻 المعلومات الأولية تشير إلى سقوط قتيلين مدنيين حتى الآن
🔻 التطور يأتي وسط تصاعد التوتر حول بسط نفوذ الدولة على المحافظة
@arabwar
🔴 غارات إسرائيلية على المنصوري و زوطر الشرقية في جنوب لبنان
🔻 الطيران الحربي الإسرائيلي نفذ ضربتين جويتين استهدفتا البلدتين
🔻 التصعيد الجوي يتواصل على الجبهة الجنوبية اللبنانية
@arabwar
🔴 القوات المسلحة اليمنية تستهدف معسكرات و مواقع لقوات مدعومة سعوديا و إماراتيا في المخا و الخوخة
🔻 الضربات نُفذت فجر الثلاثاء في المخا بمحافظة تعز و الخوخة بمحافظة الحديدة
🔻 الهجوم جرى باستخدام صواريخ بالستية و طائرات مسيرة هجومية
@arabwar
🔴 صور أقمار صناعية تظهر إصابات مباشرة في حظائر الطائرات بقاعدة موفق السلطي الجوية في الأردن خلال الضربات الصاروخية الإيرانية الليلية
🔻 الصور تشير إلى أن الضربة طالت منشآت طيران داخل القاعدة بشكل مباشر
🔻 الحديث هنا عن قاعدة جوية أردنية حساسة، ما يرفع وزن الضربة إقليمياً
@arabwar
🔴 استهداف ناقلة بثلاثة مقذوفات قرب مضيق هرمز
🔻 هيئة عمليات التجارة البحرية البريطانية قالت إن الناقلة أصيبت على بعد ١٧ ميلاً بحرياً شرق خصب في سلطنة عمان
🔻 الحادث وقع أثناء عبور السفينة في المسار الخارج من مضيق هرمز
@arabwar
🔥 نتنياهو يرفع السقف ضد إيران: هدفنا هزيمة النظام
🔻 قال إن إسرائيل لم تنتهِ بعد من القضاء على التهديد الإيراني
🔻 التصريح يأتي ضمن خطاب إسرائيلي يعتبر أن المواجهة مع طهران تتجاوز الملفين النووي و الصاروخي إلى مستقبل النظام نفسه
@arabwar
🔴 الخارجية الأميركية ترفع التحذير إلى أقصى مستوى بشأن العراق
🔻 واشنطن دعت مواطنيها إلى عدم السفر إلى العراق لأي سبب
🔻 و طلبت من الموجودين هناك المغادرة فورًا إذا كان ذلك آمنًا
🔻 التحذير يأتي على خلفية التوترات الأمنية و العسكرية في المنطقة، مع الإشارة إلى مخاطر الإرهاب و الاختطاف و الصراع المسلح داخل العراق
@arabwar
🔴 وزارة الصحة في اليمن: الحصار يفاقم الانهيار الصحي
🔻 الوزارة حذرت من أن استمرار الحصار يزيد من حدة أزمة الرعاية الصحية في البلاد
🔻 التقرير الميداني يأتي من صنعاء وسط تصاعد التحذيرات من تدهور الوضع الإنساني
@arabwar
🔥 صعود أسعار النفط عالمياً مع تصاعد التوتر في الخليج الفارسي
🔻 الأسواق تتفاعل مع التصعيد المتزايد في الممر البحري الأهم للطاقة
🔻 أي توتر إضافي في الخليج ينعكس مباشرة على تسعير النفط و حركة الإمدادات
@arabwar
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 229 posts we hold for @arabwar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@arabwar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
نايا - NAYA @naya_foriraq · 266,953 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Sonia @S0nia10 · 261,097 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
صابرين نيوز - Sabereen news @SabrenNewss · 1,102,108 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
صابرين الرياضية - Sabereen sport @Sabereen3 · 64,186 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
شبكة عين الناصرية للاخبار @mmmmd12 · 84,552 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
سومر نيوز @SumerNews2 · 30,267 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 6 September 2026
مركز خاتم الأنبياء للإعلام المقاوم @khataam313 · 25,308 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
الكورنيت الكتائبي @altaifaalmansoora · 21,952 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
الخلية التكتيكية @tactic9 · 24,874 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 September 2026
ABC العربية @abcnews_agency · 48,664 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
ذكريات جنوبي @thkreatjanubi1 · 38,732 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
مصطفى جبار سند @mustafajabbarsanad · 96,223 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 August 2026
مجلة العهد المتجدد @ehdmt · 23,017 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
توثية الشيعة @TuthiatAlshiyea · 31,407 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
فريق الولاية الإعلامي |تیم رسانه ای @StateMediaTeamForums · 25,009 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
أولاد الشايب 313 _'awlad alshayb @aliaarru · 21,871 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
شاهد - قناة المسيرة مباشر @MubasherWatch · 44,317 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
العميد @LAmad313 · 101,526 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الحرب والسلم” (@arabwar), 14,202 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arabwar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.