فوائد في النحو والصّرف والبلاغة
قناة متميزة بعلوم اللغة العربية في علم اللغة والنحو والصرف والبلاغة والقواعد الإملائية وغيرها من العلوم العربية كن متحدثا بالعلم فإن عجزت فكن ناشرا ومشاركا له فالدّال على الخير كفاعله
http://t.me/arabiia
http://t.me/getinfo
Created
20 April 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 6 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
63 measurements spanning 97 days, net -408. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,350–18,887 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 16:59
18,417
+5
9 Nov 2026, 07:10
18,412
-9
7 Nov 2026, 20:27
18,421
-2
6 Nov 2026, 19:31
18,423
+4
5 Nov 2026, 16:17
18,419
-3
4 Nov 2026, 15:49
18,422
+2
3 Nov 2026, 16:49
18,420
+1
2 Nov 2026, 19:06
18,419
-4
1 Nov 2026, 19:28
18,423
-6
31 Oct 2026, 20:48
18,429
-4
31 Oct 2026, 00:15
18,433
-6
29 Oct 2026, 21:50
18,439
-1
29 Oct 2026, 00:19
18,440
-1
27 Oct 2026, 21:51
18,441
-3
26 Oct 2026, 20:07
18,444
-3
25 Oct 2026, 20:30
18,447
-5
24 Oct 2026, 17:28
18,452
-1
23 Oct 2026, 18:57
18,453
-8
22 Oct 2026, 19:58
18,461
-2
21 Oct 2026, 19:41
18,463
first reading
Engagement
237 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 237 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,760
Videos
≈300
Links
≈19,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 24s
Average length
1m 24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
55 reactions across 36 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
45
81.8%
👍
7
12.7%
😁
2
3.64%
🔥
1
1.82%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 237 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 237 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
—
للمزيد من البطاقات المفيدة النافعة من مواعظ وعبر وأدعية وأحاديث انضم إلى قناة
بطاقات إسلامية
على الرابط الآتي:
https://t.me/bataqa
شارك ساهم بنشر الرابط
أكرمكم الله وقواكم وجزاكم الله خيرا
Showing the 12 most recent of 237 posts we hold for @arabiia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
المختصر في تفسير القرآن الكريم (صوتيًا) @MokhSound · 32,101 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 5 September 2026
النحو الميسر {قناة علوم اللغة العرببة} @annahoalmuyser · 38,122 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
منهل اللغة العربية @langg · 36,853 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“العربية لغتي الجميلة” (@arabiia), 18,417 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arabiia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
