Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for لِسَانٌ عَرَبِيٌّ

Channel

لِسَانٌ عَرَبِيٌّ

@arabiantongue

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

5,903subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001452234959
TypeChannel
Username@arabiantongue
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/arabiantongue

Growth

5,9025,9125,9076 August 2026 — 5,912 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,912 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,911 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,907 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,902 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,906 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,907 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,903 subscribers5,9036 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 21 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,901–5,914 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 15:445,903-4
20 Aug 2026, 16:075,907+1
17 Aug 2026, 16:355,906+4
14 Aug 2026, 05:375,902-5
10 Aug 2026, 19:385,907-4
7 Aug 2026, 17:575,911-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:005,912no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:565,912first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.15%
avg views ÷ 5,903 subscribers
Avg views / post
481
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 November 20251 August 2026)
Views total481
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

199 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11859.3%
👍7839.2%
😁31.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 199reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC481 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

(719) هل يصح مثل (تواصلت مع فلان)؟ يقال خطأ: تواصلت / تناقشت / تعاونت / تقاتلت / تشاجرت مع فلان (١) تواصل / تناقش / تعاون / تقاتل / تشاجر فلان مع فلان (١) سأشارك الشاشة / الملف معكم الآن (٢) سأشارك الشاشة / الملف مع الفريق الآن (٢) وقياسا على استعمال (مع) في بعض ما سبق توضع واو المعية فيقال خطأ كذالك: تواصلت / تعاونت / تناقشت / تقاتلت / تشاجرت وفلانًا أو: تواصل / تعاون / تناقش / تقاتل / تشاجر فلانٌ وفلانًا بنصب (

9👍3

Signed نزار شهاب الدين

25 Jul 2026, 20:45 UTC882 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

(718) القمرة ظننتُ كما ظن كثيرون صحة رواية استعمال ابن الهيثم في كتابه عن البصريات لفظَ "قُمْرة" بمعنى حُجرة وأن اللفظ الأعجمي "camera" مأخوذ عنه وعلى ها ذا عرّبنا آلة التصوير فسميناها "قُمْرة"، وقد غلطتُ في ها ذا وما حقَّقتُ الرواية ولا اللفظ في المعجمات حتى نبّه أخ كريم من المجتهدين في التعريب (سأنشر رابط صفحته) على ها ذا الأمر فحققتُ قوله وأعدتُ النظر مستعينا بالمِذكاء فتبيّن ما يلي. في المعجمات: تدور مادة (ق م

14👍9

Signed نزار شهاب الدين

21 Jun 2026, 09:34 UTC≈1,280 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

(717) بتاع ها ذا اللفظ شائع على لسان أهل مصر، بمعنى (ما لي)، وقيل في تأويل أصله كلام مثل (متاعي) وهو قريب معقول إلا أن صاحب (تاج العروس) ذكر الأصل التاريخي في باب (ب ي ع) فقال: (مُبْتَاعِي، أَي اشْتَرَيْتُه بمَالِي، وَقد اسْتَعْمَلَهُ المِصْرِيُّونَ فِي كَلامِهِم كَثِيرًا، فيَحْذِفُونَ المِيمَ. ومِنْهُم مَنْ أَفرَطَ فجَمَعَ فَقَالَ: بُتُوعِي، وَهُوَ غَلَطٌ، وإِنَّمَا نَبَّهْت عَلَى ذالِكَ لأَنَّ كَثِيرًا من النّاسِ

15👍7😁2

Signed نزار شهاب الدين

2 Jun 2026, 20:45 UTC≈1,520 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

(716) نعم بالله - النعم بالله فتوى للأستاذ حسام كُريِّم مع زيادة طفيفة مني سؤال: نرى كثيرًا من الناس إذا ذُكر الله قالوا (ونِعْمَ بالله) ومنهم من يقول (والنعم بالله)، فأيّ القولين أصحّ لغويّا؟ الجواب: كما نعلم أنّ (نعمَ) فعل ماض جامد لإنشاء المدح، ولا بدّ له من فاعل، فالفاعل عمدة لا يمكن الاستغناء عنه، ولا بد له من مخصوصٍ بالمدح، فنقول: نعمَ الرجلُ زيدٌ، فتكون أركان أسلوب المدح بحسب المثال ثلاثة، فعل المدح (نعمَ)،

8👍4

Signed نزار شهاب الدين

10 May 2026, 20:46 UTC≈1,500 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

(715) آئب (ثاني اثنين - ٢/٢) ها ذا ملحق جعلت فيه خلاصة الجزء الأول لظني أنني أفضتُ في شرح بعض القواعد التي قد يستغني عنها بعضنا. الخلاصة: • لا يصح تخفيف (آئب) أو (قائم) أو (بائع) أو ما أشبهها بقلب الهمزة ياءًا (آيِب) أو (قايِم) أو (بايِع) بدليل السماع والقياس • إما أن تقول (آئِب) و(قائم) و(بائع) بلا تخفيف، وإما أن تخفف بين بين • التخفيف بين بين لا يُرسَم بياء صريحة حتى لا يلتبس على القارئ بل يُنظَر في طرائق الكتاب

👍51

Signed نزار شهاب الدين

10 May 2026, 20:45 UTC≈1,080 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

(715) آئب (أول اثنين - ٢/١) إذا كان الفعل أجوف، أي معتل العين، وعين الفعل هي حرفه الثاني لأننا نزنه على (ف ع ل)، كان على أحد صورتين: قام أصله: قَوَمَ فصار بالإعلال (قامَ) باع أصله: بَيَعَ فصار بالإعلال (باعَ) فإذا أردنا صوغ اسم الفاعل منه وضعنا ألفًا بعد فائه (أي أول حروفه، فنحن نشير بحروف الميزان كما ذكرنا) فصار (قاام - بااع) لاكن وزن (فاعِل) مكسور العين، فيجب أن نكسر عين الفعل بعد إضافة ألف (فاعل) وكما ترى قد قُ

👍52

Signed نزار شهاب الدين

8 May 2026, 14:09 UTC967 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

Signed نزار شهاب الدين

2 Apr 2026, 09:34 UTC≈1,670 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

(714) رف رفوف أرف لفظ (رَفّ) عربيّ صحيح فصيح يعني ما يُرَكَّب من ألواح ليُحمَل عليها متاع البيت، وليس (رفرف) صوابه كما زُعِم بل مرادفُه. ويُجمَع (رفّ) جمع قِلَّة على: أَرُفّ وأصلها (أَرْفُف) على وزن (أَفْعُل) مثل (وجه أوجُه)، وها ذا المفكوك شائع بين الناس لاكنه لا يصح لأن الإدغام فيه واجب كما وجب في (ضَبّ أَضُبّ) وفي (صَكّ أَصُكّ) على الوزن نفسه، وكذا في ألفاظ أخرى على وزن يشبه وزن الفعل مثل (أَصَمّ). (والشيء بالشي

8👍4

Signed نزار شهاب الدين

31 Mar 2026, 02:08 UTC≈1,490 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

معذرة كان بالاستبانة الأولى نقص فأتممته

👍2

Signed نزار شهاب الدين

31 Mar 2026, 02:07 UTC≈1,590 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

ما جمع (رَفّ) ؟ (الجواب من الحافظة بلا بحث)

  1. أَرْفُف47%
  2. رُفوف49%
  3. أَرُفّ14%
  4. ليس اللفظ (رَفّ) عربيًّا والصواب (رَفْرَف)14%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍21

Signed نزار شهاب الدين

2 Mar 2026, 08:33 UTC≈2,150 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

(713) ملحق ثالث - ساعات الليل والنهار عند العرب وها ذا التقسيم يوافق التقسيم الفرنجي إذ يجعل النهار والليل اثنتي عشرة ساعة

👍82😁1

Signed نزار شهاب الدين

1 Mar 2026, 09:28 UTC≈1,720 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

(713) ملحق ثان - ساعات الليل وهي أحد عشر جزءًا كذالك، فإذا سمّينا كل جزء ساعة صار الليل إحدى عشْرة ساعة

5👍2

Signed نزار شهاب الدين

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @arabiantongue. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Mar 2026, 02:07 UTCAnonymous Poll167 voters

ما جمع (رَفّ) ؟ (الجواب من الحافظة بلا بحث)

  1. أَرْفُف47%
  2. رُفوف49%
  3. أَرُفّ14%
  4. ليس اللفظ (رَفّ) عربيًّا والصواب (رَفْرَف)14%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2025 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“لِسَانٌ عَرَبِيٌّ” (@arabiantongue), 5,903 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arabiantongue.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.