Channel
@aquarelle_research
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
316subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001731277525 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aquarelle_research |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aquarelle_research |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 03:58 | 316 | +1 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 315 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:54 | 316 | +5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 311 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 312 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 312 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
38 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 15 | 39.5% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 36.8% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 13.2% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А вы бы поехали на ужин, который начинается не с меню, а с лесной тропы или рыбалки? 🥗 Пока одни выбирают ресторан по интерьеру, другие едут за город — собирать себе ужин, с ощущением, что ты не просто поел, а прожил вкус места. Больше про этот #тренд в карточках.
❤3👍1🔥1
Когда у компании большой портфель, рост — это не «запустить еще один продукт». Рост — это: четко понимать, кому, в какой ситуации, и зачем вы предлагаете каждый бренд. В карточках подробный кейс, как мы сделали двухуровневую сегментацию и наложили на нее бренды клиента. А что у нас получилось, читай в кейсе. 👆 #кейс #продукт
❤2👍2🔥1
Всем привет! 🌸 А вы уже видели милый тренд про наших пушистиков? Они теперь становятся героями маркетинговых коммуникаций 🐶 Переходите в карточки товаров, чтобы узнать подробнее. #тренд
❤2🔥2🥰2
Posted without readable text
Вы когда‑нибудь откладывали удовольствие, чтобы получить еще больше в будущем? 🍰 Отложенная гратификация — способность отказаться от немедленной, но маленькой радости ради большей выгоды. Это не просто про силу воли, а про стратегическое мышление и контроль импульсов. Автор концепции — психолог Уолтер Мишел. В 1972 году в Стэнфорде он провёл знаменитый «зефирный эксперимент», где детям 4–5 лет предложили выбор: съ…
❤2👍2🔥2
Всем привет! Делимся нашим кейсом, как мы помогли крупному клиенту электроники понять, что драйвит продажи кроме промо и кешбеков. Читай в карточках, что мы сделали👆 ⁉️Есть вопросы или хочешь обсудить задачу? Пиши на почту: [email protected] #кейс #ценовыеисследования
🔥3❤2
Всем привет! 👋 Вчера мы предложили вам угадать бренды по закрытым логотипам. А сегодня готовы показать результаты нашего исследования и разобраться, почему одни бренды мы узнаём буквально по одному элементу, а другие — нет. Оказывается, дело не всегда в логотипе целиком. Иногда достаточно одной детали: характерного символа, необычной формы, фирменной буквы или шрифта. Именно так работает визуальная узнаваемость бре…
🔥6❤3🏆2
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @aquarelle_research. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Акварель” (@aquarelle_research), 316 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aquarelle_research.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.