Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for المنثور من عقيدة الشافعية

Channel

المنثور من عقيدة الشافعية

@aqidashafiiya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,125subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001898678628
TypeChannel
Username@aqidashafiiya
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aqidashafiiya

Growth

1,1181,1251,121.510 August 2026 — 1,124 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,122 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,118 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,122 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,125 subscribers10 August 202619 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,117–1,126 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 20:041,125+3
16 Aug 2026, 18:121,122+4
13 Aug 2026, 08:151,118-4
10 Aug 2026, 12:231,122-2
10 Aug 2026, 06:311,124first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 19 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1948.7%
1641.0%
🔥25.13%
😱12.56%
🤯12.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 15 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 May 2026, 17:47 UTC928 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

أبو طيب الطبري وأبو علي الطبري الشافعيان وإثبات ذنوب الأنبياء -منقول-

👍2

15 May 2026, 17:45 UTC941 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

الإمام أبو الطيب الطبري الشافعي يتهم أبا حنيفة وأصحابه بشعبة من الرفض بسبب كلامهم في أخبار أبي هريرة وينقل نقولات نادرا عن كتب أبي عبيد القاسم وابن سريج و ابن المنذر المفقودة في الطعن الشديد في الحنفية -منقول-

👍2

9 May 2026, 21:30 UTC953 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

قال ابن القاص : فزعم (أبا حنيفة) أن أربعة لو شهدوا على رجل أنه زنى في هذا البيت فقال احدهم : في هذه الزاوية و قال الاخر : في الزاوية الثانية وقال الثالث في الزاوية الثالثة وقال الرابع : في الزاوية الاخرى، ارى القياس أن لا شيء عليه و لكني استحسن أن يرجم هذا الرجل فاستسحن أن يقتل المسلم من غير كتاب أوجبه و لا سنة و لا اجماع و لا قياس

👍3🤯1😱1

9 May 2026, 21:28 UTC≈1,020 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

﴿و كيف يستجيز انكار ذلك من كان كتب صاحبه (أبا حنيفة) محشو بتخريج المسألة على قولين أحدهما القياس و الاخر الاستحسان ثم يضاعف القولين﴾

👍3

9 May 2026, 21:23 UTC839 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ابن القاص الشافعي ردا على من يزعم تناقض اقوال الشافعي ﴿ان صاحبه يقول بذلك كله وبأكثره﴾ يقصد أبا حنيفة نصرة القولين لابن القاص

👍2

9 May 2026, 21:13 UTC777 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ابن القاص الشافعي (335 هـ) في دلائل القبلة له

3

9 May 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,010 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

رحم الله الشافعي

👍6

1 May 2026, 17:55 UTC≈2,470 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

أبيات نادرة للشيخ أبي الحسن الكرجي رحمه الله سماع أبي يعد السمعاني عنه

1

1 May 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,050 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

1

24 Apr 2026, 21:02 UTC≈2,370 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

قال أبو بكر البيهقي : جاءَنِي شخص من أصْحابِي بِكِتاب لأبي جَعْفَر الطَّحاوِيّ فكم من حَدِيث ضَعِيف فِيهِ صَححهُ لأجل رَأْيه وكم من حَدِيث فِيهِ صَحِيح ضعفه لأجل رَأْيه.

🔥2

24 Apr 2026, 18:55 UTC≈2,840 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

١٧٠٠٣ - وَرَوَاهُ مُسْلِمُ بْنُ الْحَجَّاجِ فِي الصَّحِيحِ , عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ يَحْيَى , وَغَيْرِهِ , عَنْ سُفْيَانَ , عَنِ الزُّهْرِيِّ , عَنْ عَمْرَةَ , عَنْ عَائِشَةَ , قَالَتْ: «كَانَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يَقْطَعُ السَّارِقَ فِي رُبُعِ دِينَارٍ فَصَاعِدًا» ١٧٠٠٤ - فَجَاءَ أَبُو جَعْفَرٍ الطَّحَاوِيُّ رَحِمَنَا اللَّهُ وَإِيَّاهُ , وَرَوَاهُ عَنْ يُونُسَ بْنِ عَبْدِ الْأَعْلَى , عَنْ سُ

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @aqidashafiiya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,421,653 of 1,568,528entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“المنثور من عقيدة الشافعية” (@aqidashafiiya), 1,125 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aqidashafiiya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.