Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 缅北强奸 | 猪仔 |轮奸 |强暴 |杀人打人

Channel

缅北强奸 | 猪仔 |轮奸 |强暴 |杀人打人

@apt789mm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

751subscribers

-292 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003606427516
TypeChannel
Username@apt789mm
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/apt789mm

Growth

7511,04389720 August 2026 — 1,043 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,043 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,038 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,001 subscribers30 August 2026 — 927 subscribers8 September 2026 — 751 subscribers20 August 20268 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 20 days, net -292. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 707–1,087 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 22:36751-176
30 Aug 2026, 16:43927-74
27 Aug 2026, 07:491,001-37
24 Aug 2026, 13:481,038-5
21 Aug 2026, 05:221,043no change
20 Aug 2026, 09:451,043first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 31 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2026 to 3 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Feb 2026, 07:30 UTC≈3,430 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

布丁大法 精选福利姬 cos 牛仔硬糖兔 大尺度诱惑自拍福利视频合集 主打的就是一个玉,粉粉嫩嫩的不断看着真鸡巴好看,这种堪称可食用级别,搁我直接放到嘴巴里面 #布丁大法 #cospaly #少女 #反差 #性奴

5

3 Feb 2026, 07:30 UTC≈3,130 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

布丁大法 精选福利姬 cos 牛仔硬糖兔 大尺度诱惑自拍福利视频合集 主打的就是一个反差和可爱,这小骚母狗在眼前,展示着性感身材,勾引着感觉很好玩的模样 #布丁大法 #cospaly #性奴 #母狗 #淫荡

31 Jan 2026, 09:28 UTC≈3,230 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

#百家乐游戏网站 #百家乐游戏网址 #百家乐游戏注册网址 #百家乐游戏注册网站 #百家乐游戏投注平台 #百家乐游戏在线网址 #百家乐哪里有好平台 #百家乐游戏哪里的最靠谱 #百家乐现场代投 #百家乐视频电话代投 #环球国际 #欧亚国际 #银河国际 #缅甸赌场 #新葡京赌场 #皇家赌场 #东南亚赌场 #菲律宾赌场 #加拿大赌场 #云顶赌场 #澳门赌场 #圣淘沙赌场 #新盛赌场 支持:人民币-缅币-USDT-支付宝-微信-KBZ 办理上下分 客服飞机 https://t.me/faca962 双向飞机 @faca962bot 游戏官网链接 fc9.im 游戏链接:http://42.51.43.192:25504?Tesla=MDAzMzY5

2

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @apt789mm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“缅北强奸 | 猪仔 |轮奸 |强暴 |杀人打人” (@apt789mm), 751 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apt789mm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.