Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Apremaccs' report forms

Channel

Apremaccs' report forms

@apremaccsreportforms

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

276subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001707979146
TypeChannel
Username@apremaccsreportforms
Created1 May 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/apremaccsreportforms

Growth

2682762727 August 2026 — 268 subscribers7 August 2026 — 270 subscribers15 August 2026 — 273 subscribers22 August 2026 — 276 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 267–277 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 07:08276+3
15 Aug 2026, 19:03273+3
7 Aug 2026, 23:42270+2
7 Aug 2026, 07:16268first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 1 May 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.8%
avg views ÷ 276 subscribers
Avg views / post
85.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held7 (1 May 20223 August 2026)
Views total85
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2090.9%
❤‍🔥29.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2022 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC85 viewsread 7 August 2026

cleared po all reports for hbo under this email [email protected] - wag malikot kamay ah, pakisabihan buyers niyo hindi to solo acc - dm me for new password @deaprems required na monitoring form automatic kick kapag wala! tignan natin hanggang saan ang kul8 niyo mwa

13 Sept 2025, 11:39 UTC≈2,360 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

𝑨𝑪𝑪𝑶𝑼𝑵𝑻 𝑷𝑹𝑬𝑴𝑰𝑼𝑴 𝑹𝑬𝑷𝑶𝑹𝑻 𝑭𝑶𝑹𝑴𝑨𝑻: account availed: email: working pass: profile & pin: solo or shared: subscription days/months: date purchase: remaining days: attach proof of account issue: attach proof of vouch: ──── 𝑾𝑯𝑬𝑹𝑬 𝑻𝑶 𝑺𝑬𝑵𝑫 𝑹𝑬𝑷𝑶𝑹𝑻𝑺 ──── ⌗ All reports except zoom / wps / canva must be sent to @Apremaccs_report ⌗ For zoom pro / canva / wps reports send to me @deaprems

9

13 Sept 2025, 11:38 UTC≈2,040 viewsread 7 August 2026

starting today, lahat ng mga nandadaya ng vouch = automatic void. hindi po porket sa admins niyo binili, hindi ko na chinecheck. May access po ako sa lahat ng accs na gamit ng admins fyi. sobrang luwag ko na sa report, walang cut off + same day fixing at lalong hindi required ng another vouch kapag nafix pero bakit need mandaya pa? vouch nalang yan after niyo bumili ah. siguro deserve ko naman kasi maayos ako na sel

28 Aug 2025, 14:09 UTC≈1,750 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

just a reminder po baka nakakalimot po tayo na ang number 1 rules here sa tg is "do not expect stability sa mga accounts purchased here" Hindi na po ako student at lalong hindi tambay, nagtatrabaho po ako sa umaga. Pag-uwi ko start na ng fixing and restocking ko. Tao lang po ako, napapagod din, minsan nakakatulog after work. Kung hindi mafix within the day, sana naman kahit onting unawa't pasensya lang. tanungin ni

10❤‍🔥2

25 Jan 2025, 07:45 UTC≈2,520 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

𝑹𝑬𝑭𝑼𝑵𝑫 𝑭𝑶𝑹𝑴𝑨𝑻 & 𝑪𝑶𝑴𝑷𝑼𝑻𝑨𝑻𝑰𝑶𝑵 refund is granted only if the method in making the accounts are already patched & if it cannot be replace anymore. Premium account availed: Email: Solo or shared: Months of subscription: Date availed: Remaining days: Price paid: Refund computation(complete): Gcash number with name: For days of subscription refer to the following: 1 month = 30days 2 months = 60days 3 months = 90days 6 mo

25 Jan 2025, 07:36 UTC≈2,010 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

──── 𝑹𝑬𝑴𝑰𝑵𝑫𝑬𝑹𝑺 𝑩𝑬𝑭𝑶𝑹𝑬 𝑺𝑬𝑵𝑫𝑰𝑵𝑮 𝑹𝑬𝑷𝑶𝑹𝑻𝑺: ⌗ All reports except zoom must be sent to @Apremaccs_report ⌗ Double check the account first before reporting. ⌗ Make sure that the details you fill up are correct. ⌗ If you only used the premium acc you availed to me for 24hrs and you encountered a problem, no need to report it; I'll fix or replace it right away. Direct report to me @deaprems ⌗ No cut off time but please ref

1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @apremaccsreportforms. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 393,121 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Apremaccs' report forms” (@apremaccsreportforms), 276 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apremaccsreportforms.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.