Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

小烧鸡内核主频道

@appletzpd0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,820subscribers

+209 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002260916316
TypeChannel
Username@appletzpd0
Description交流群 https://t.me/appletzpdD dit驱动频道 @ditdrivernn 万能搜索群 https://t.me/Tab99811111111 葫芦娃频道 https://t.me/HLWNHNBB
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/appletzpd0

Growth

16,61116,82016,715.511 August 2026 — 16,611 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,713 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,820 subscribers11 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +209. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,580–16,851 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 10:3316,820+107
12 Aug 2026, 14:0316,713+102
11 Aug 2026, 19:4616,611first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.9%
avg views ÷ 16,820 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,550
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.371%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held14 (12 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total90,640
Reactions total336
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
43
Videos
5
Links
56

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

385 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
29175.6%
👍8020.8%
😁61.56%
🤔30.779%
🤩30.779%
😢20.519%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 385reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC≈2,060 views28 reactionsread 13 August 2026

有没有大牛知道打太猛了小黑屋24小时要不要刷机 😭 我去咸鱼买了个肝黑屋的,后续有什么要养号的吗?有没有爸爸告诉我 😭

👍244

10 Aug 2026, 01:13 UTC≈4,060 views28 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

载具轮胎显示,载具轮胎血量显示 以后看到载具直接开枪打就行,优先把轮胎,全部打爆,让敌人的车跑不起来 等会儿把追踪给写上, 在海岛,只要你看见车只管开枪就行,轮胎直接秒爆😂

25😁3

10 Aug 2026, 01:12 UTC≈3,990 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

1.新增载具 轮胎 追踪,扫车,优先把敌人的轮胎扫爆 2.新增载具轮胎血量实体显示 3.彻底修复安卓16投屏闪退问题 主频道: @appletzpd0 ✍️光头强频道: @gtqnb0000 🎉葫芦娃频道 :@HLWNHNBB 👍万能搜索 @Tab99811111111

18

6 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈6,440 views45 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

😚修复PUBG闪框解密 🫥 和平新增观战,巡查员预警(不是空壳,蛮蛮开源数据,已验证真实有效) 主频道: @appletzpd0 ✍️光头强频道: @gtqnb0000 🎉葫芦娃频道 :@HLWNHNBB 👍万能搜索 @Tab99811111111

33👍10🤔2

2 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC≈9,280 views37 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

#小烧鸡 😀😃😀 1. 新增指挥官密钥解密,依旧算法改内存小烧鸡死妈 2. 修复安卓16系统录屏投屏程序会崩溃的问题 主频道: @appletzpd0 ✍️光头强频道: @gtqnb0000 🎉葫芦娃频道 :@HLWNHNBB 👍万能搜索 @Tab99811111111

29👍8

1 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTC≈8,930 views37 reactionsread 13 August 2026

卧槽和平加密真恶心,游戏直接锁60帧🤡 我说怎么一堆人说小烧鸡卡呢,之前我账号没加密,打的贼丝滑,今天死人和平给我下发个加密。都快卡成小米8了 账号被加密了就别开算法解密硬玩了,一点游戏体验都没有,直接刷机换个号玩得了

27👍6🤩2😢2

30 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC≈9,370 views27 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

#小烧鸡 更新内容: 1. 新增载具不瞄功能 2. 优化人机识别逻辑,忽略人机开启后排除高级人机,不排除地铁BOSS 3. 新增内鬼显示功能 主频道: @appletzpd0 ✍️光头强频道: @gtqnb0000 🎉葫芦娃频道 :@HLWNHNBB 👍万能搜索 @Tab99811111111

26👍1

24 Jul 2026, 22:55 UTC≈8,870 views34 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

#小烧鸡 小烧鸡和平内核更新日志 1.优化和平闪框解密 2.修复出现假人绘制,解密漏人bug 小烧鸡PUBG内核更新日志 1.修复头甲包显示全是同等级bug 2.修复被瞄预警绘制 3.修复地铁逃生宝箱显示 4.新增低等级宝箱过滤(过滤lv3等级一下) 主频道: @appletzpd0 ✍️光头强频道: @gtqnb0000 🎉葫芦娃频道 :@HLWNHNBB

24👍10

22 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC≈9,420 views30 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

小烧鸡pubg 1.修复网页雷达共享无法访问 1.修复绘制载具不显示 3.修复颜色配置无法保存 4.修复绘制js9且无法关闭

23👍6🤩1

20 Jul 2026, 06:48 UTC≈8,480 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

小烧鸡pubg 1.修复网页雷达共享无法访问 1.修复绘制载具不显示 3.修复颜色配置无法保存 4.修复绘制js9且无法关闭

👍74🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @appletzpd0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 48,786 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小烧鸡内核主频道” (@appletzpd0), 16,820 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/appletzpd0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.