Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Apple Market | iPhone 17 | Уфа

@applemarketufa

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

8,496subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001862060268
TypeChannel
Username@applemarketufa
DescriptionМагазин оригинальной техники Apple в Уфе Работаем каждый день С 11:00 до 21:00 Адрес магазина: Менделеева,120 Менеджер для заказа / по любым вопросам: @apple_market_ufa
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/applemarketufa

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@applemarketufa01/2275 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC@applemarketufa/3951 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC1.00under a minute
@applemarketufa/3952 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC@applemarketufa01/2335 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC1.00under a minute
@applemarketufa/3959 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC@applemarketufa01/2416 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC1.00under a minute
@applemarketufa/3961 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC@applemarketufa01/2437 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC1.00under a minute
@applemarketufa/3963 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC@applemarketufa01/2457 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC1.00under a minute
@applemarketufa/3954 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC@applemarketufa01/2346 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC0.92under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@applemarketufa017 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.98under a minutethis entry (70)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @applemarketufa — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

8,4968,5308,5137 August 2026 — 8,530 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,530 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,496 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,491–8,535 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 02:218,496-34
7 Aug 2026, 13:018,530no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:528,530first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.58%
avg views ÷ 8,496 subscribers
Avg views / post
304
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 42 of 46 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held46 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total13,980
Reactions total341
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,180
Videos
482
Links
435

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 32s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

341 reactions across 42 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9527.9%
🔥9026.4%
😍4613.5%
❤‍🔥123.52%
🤣123.52%
😭113.23%
💯102.93%
👍92.64%
👨‍💻82.35%
👀72.05%
🤔72.05%
😁61.76%
😱61.76%
👏41.17%
🙈41.17%
🤯41.17%
😘30.88%
20.587%
👌20.587%
😎20.587%
1 further kind10.293%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 341reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC56 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Это правда! Это работает только на экранах типа OLED / AMOLED (которые стоят в большинстве современных смартфонов). В таких дисплеях каждый пиксель подсвечивается отдельно, а для отображения черного цвета он просто полностью выключается и не тратит энергию. @artem_kyznets0v выигрывает Powerbank MagSafe ❤️‍🔥 А так же @Tagfin_khai выигрывает картхолдер Apple🎉

🔥2😍1

12 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC115 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Крайний вопрос 🙋🏼‍♀️ Пишите ответы в комментарии👇 «Темная тема на смартфоне реально экономят заряд батареи?»

🤔1

12 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC156 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Миф. Это устаревшая привычка из эпохи никелевых аккумуляторов, имевших «эффект памяти». В современных смартфонах используются литий-ионные (Li-ion) и литий-полимерные (Li-Po) батареи. Для них глубокий разряд до 0% — это стресс, который ускоряет износ и уменьшает срок службы аккумулятора. Оптимальный режим для литиевых батарей — поддерживать уровень заряда в пределах 20–80%. Разряжать новый телефон «в ноль» перед пер

👍1

12 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC171 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

❌Нужно ли разряжать новый телефон до 0%?

  1. Правда19%
  2. Миф81%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC181 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Миф. Это не только не полезно, но и вредно для устройства. На большинство современных экранов (смартфонов, планшетов, мониторов) с завода нанесено олеофобное покрытие — специальный нанослой, отталкивающий жир, отпечатки пальцев и облегчающий скольжение. Спирт, антисептики и агрессивные бытовые чистящие средства являются сильными растворителями. Они быстро разрушают этот тонкий защитный слой. В результате экран стано

3

12 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC171 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

❌Протирать экран антисептиком или спиртом - полезно?

  1. Миф56%
  2. Правда44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC164 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Миф. Заряжать смартфон ночью полностью безопасно. В современных смартфонах встроен специальный контроллер питания. Как только уровень заряда батареи достигает 100%, плата автоматически прекращает подачу тока, переводя устройство на питание напрямую от сети. Поэтому телефон не сгорит и не перезарядится! Единственная рекомендация — не класть заряжающийся смартфон под подушку, чтобы исключить естественный перегрев кор

👍4

12 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC174 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

❌Если оставить телефон заряжаться на ночь - аккумулятор сгорит?

  1. Правда12%
  2. Миф88%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC190 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🧠💡 РУБРИКА «МИФ ИЛИ ПРАВДА?» НАЧИНАЕТСЯ! Как хорошо вы разбираетесь в фактах? Сможете ли отличить правду от выдумки в мире технологий и гаджетов? Сейчас проверим! 👇 Тот, кто ПЕРВЫЙ ответит правильно НА ВСЕ вопросы, получит приз от a:Market! 🍀 Удачи всем участникам! Пусть победит самый знающий и быстрый! 🔥

💯4🔥1😍1

12 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC205 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥42😍1

12 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC242 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Думаете, телефон с царапинами и потертостями уже ничего не стоит? Листайте карусель! ➡️ Многие откладывают обновление, думая, что старый девайс заберут за копейки. В a:Market всё совсем иначе: •Честно оцениваем даже «уставшие» устройства. •Даем мощный Trade-in бонус при обмене. •Помогаем выгодно сэкономить на покупке нового флагмана! Не давайте старому гаджету пылиться в тумбочке — приносите его на оценку в a:Marke

🔥21👌1

11 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC294 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Когда отдал все деньги за новый гаджет, а обед в планах не числился… 😂😭 Не надо так! В a:Market забирайте технику в беспроцентную рассрочку с комфортными платежами. 🎁 Бонус: при рассрочке от 2 лет — Яндекс Станция с Алисой в подарок! Приходите, сбережем и бюджет, и желудок! 📲

2🙈2❤‍🔥1🔥1😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @applemarketufa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTCAnonymous Poll48 voters

❌Нужно ли разряжать новый телефон до 0%?

  1. Правда19%
  2. Миф81%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTCAnonymous Poll41 voters

❌Протирать экран антисептиком или спиртом - полезно?

  1. Миф56%
  2. Правда44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTCAnonymous Poll49 voters

❌Если оставить телефон заряжаться на ночь - аккумулятор сгорит?

  1. Правда12%
  2. Миф88%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTCAnonymous Poll37 voters

Купили бы такую версию iPhone?🍌

  1. Да, необычно и классно🔥27%
  2. Нет, я приверженец стандарта👌🏻73%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTCAnonymous Poll46 voters

Какой ты пользователь?

  1. 😎Бесстрашный: Никаких чехлов и стекол. iPhone должен ощущаться так, как задумал Тим Кук.11%
  2. 🛡️Перестраховщик: Противоударный чехол, бронестекло на экран, стекло на камеру.48%
  3. 🤩Оптимист: Защитное стекло треснуло еще полгода назад, но да ладно, экрану же не мешает!41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Apple Market | iPhone 17 | Уфа” (@applemarketufa), 8,496 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/applemarketufa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.