Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Apple.L56

Channel

Apple.L56

@appleL56

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

8,119subscribers

+89 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001857878115
TypeChannel
Username@appleL56
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/appleL56

Growth

8,0308,1198,074.57 August 2026 — 8,030 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,034 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,050 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,068 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,065 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,075 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,095 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,104 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,119 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net +89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,017–8,132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 13:048,119+15
26 Aug 2026, 18:028,104+9
24 Aug 2026, 02:558,095+20
20 Aug 2026, 09:068,075+10
17 Aug 2026, 15:388,065-3
14 Aug 2026, 15:058,068+18
11 Aug 2026, 07:418,050+16
8 Aug 2026, 04:208,034+4
7 Aug 2026, 10:158,030first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.2%
avg views ÷ 8,119 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,260
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.333%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held19 (26 December 202517 August 2026)
Views total16,300
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

460 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22047.8%
👍9620.9%
🔥8618.7%
194.13%
👌102.17%
❤‍🔥81.74%
🥰61.30%
👎51.09%
💯40.87%
🏆20.435%
🍓10.217%
🐳10.217%
😁10.217%
😍10.217%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 460reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @appleL56. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 December 2025 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC≈1,410 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

⌚️Apple Watch↙️ Apple Watch SE3 SE 40 Midnight 2025 M/L - 24.500 SE 40 Midnight 2025 S/M - 24.500 SE 44 Midnight 2025 S/M - 26.000 Apple Watch S10 42/46mm S10 46 Rose Gold M/L - 31.000 Apple Watch S11 42/46mm S11 42 Jet Black S/M - 32.600 S11 42 Jet Black M/L - 32.100 S11 42 Rose Gold S/M - 32.900 S11 42 Rose Gold M/L - 32.900 S11 42 Space Gray S/M - 32000 S11 46 Space Gray M/L -34.800 S11 46 Space Gray S/M

4

Signed 😉 🤚🏼

15 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC≈2,770 viewsread 28 August 2026

Актуальный прайс! Цены могут меняться в связи с курсом!

Signed Shah1

13 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC≈3,780 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/vkusnoAppleL56

👍65🔥4

Signed Shah1

12 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC≈3,850 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

⚫НОВОЕ ПОСТУПЛЕНИЕ Fold 8 12/256 Graphite-133000 Fold 8 12/512 Cream-150000 Fold 8 12/512 Graphite-150000 Fold 8 Ultra 12/256 Cream-142000 Fold 8 Ultra 12/256Graphite-143000 Fold 8 Ultra 12/512 Cream-161000 Fold 8 Ultra 12/512 Graphite-161000 ⚫ по вопросам: @shah_105

76

Signed Shah1

6 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC≈4,490 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Dji OSMO ACTION 6

👍112

Signed Shah1

29 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC≈6,610 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Фитнес-браслеты whoop 5.0 peak + 12 месяцев подписки - 24.000 whoop 5.0 mg life + 12 месяцев подписки - 32.000 Fitbit Air Obsidian - 14.000 Fitbit Air Lavender - 14.000 Fitbit Air Berry - 14.000 ⚫ @shah_105

7👍53

Signed Shah1

29 Jul 2026, 09:13 UTC≈4,970 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Meta Starfire Kylie Edition Classic Black/Black 55.000₽ Meta Starfire Kylie Edition Classic Black/Clear Grey Transitions 67.000₽ умные солнцезащитные очки Meta, созданные совместно с Kylie Jenner. Модель сочетает узкую овальную форму, чёрную оправу Classic Black, чёрные линзы, камеру 12 Мп, видео до 3K, открытый звук и встроенный Meta AI. Версия Classic Black / Black создана для тех, кто хочет не просто AI-очки,

9🔥3

Signed Shah1

27 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC≈5,060 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Фен-стайлер Dyson Airwrap i.d. HS08 Complete Long (Ceramic Pink/Rose Gold) 35.000₽ ⚫ @shah_105

6🔥6👍4

Signed Shah1

1 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC≈9,220 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

👤Проектор Лазерный Dangbei DBOX02 черный Современный лазерный проектор с ярким изображением и поддержкой 4K — отличный выбор для домашнего кинотеатра, игр и просмотра спортивных трансляций. ✔️ Яркость 2450 ISO люмен ✔️ Изображение до 200” ✔️ Google TV с Netflix, YouTube и другими приложениями ✔️ Автофокус и автоматическая коррекция изображения ✔️ Встроенные динамики с Dolby Audio и DTS 95.000₽ ⚫ @shah_105

🔥11👍32

Signed Shah1

30 Jun 2026, 11:49 UTC≈7,900 views27 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Экономьте время и деньги вместе с нами: Trade-in самый выгодный способ покупки телефона. Обновите свой телефон по выгодной цене, сдав нам своё старое устройство и доплатив разницу. Мы выкупим ваш гаджет независимо от его состояния, а оценить его можно и онлайн, вам только надо описать состояние и модель. Так же мы всегда можем выкупить ваше старое устройство без покупки нового. По всем вопросам: @shah_105

👍13🔥64💯4

Signed Shah1

28 Jun 2026, 14:57 UTC≈7,710 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Всем Добрый День! Наша группа с Вкусными Ценами на б/у технику! Наши телефоны исключительно без ремонтов и дефектов! 😮‍💨 https://t.me/vkusnoAppleL56 ⚫По всем вопросам: @shah_105

9👍53😁1

Signed Shah1

20 Jun 2026, 10:29 UTC≈9,990 views37 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🆕Новое поступление! MacBook Neo 8/256 Indigo 67.990₽ MacBook Neo 8/256 Citrus- 🔥66.990₽ MacBook Neo 8/256 Silver- 67.990₽ MacBook Neo 8/256 Blush 69.990₽ MacBook Neo 8/512 Indigo- 74.990₽ MacBook Neo 8/512 Silver- 74.990₽ 😑 @shah_105

🔥1812👎5❤‍🔥2

Signed Shah1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @appleL56. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@appleL56 edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Apple.L56” (@appleL56), 8,119 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/appleL56.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.