2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 151–153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 17:38
152
no change
3 Sept 2026, 01:16
152
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
108.2%
avg views ÷ 152 subscribers
Avg views / post
165
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
11 (11 May 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
987
Reactions total
41
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 01:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 09s
Average length
1m 35s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
130 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5220177636097012004
30
23.1%
custom 5240415835528375016
30
23.1%
custom 5409101131345323453
19
14.6%
custom 5235545424219087972
16
12.3%
custom 5371046617296172067
13
10.0%
custom 5337049262498796368
11
8.46%
custom 5359373630625049150
6
4.62%
custom 5465551037567888194
5
3.85%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 11 we hold a reading for · 64%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @apparentlykoch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 May 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Полтора года жизни буквально уместились у меня на ладони
Странно – я узнаю себя на каждой из них.
И одновременно не узнаю.
Смотрю на первого себя и понимаю: он был легче, наивнее, свободнее.
Но при этом не обладал тем, что есть у него сейчас.
Я не знаю, кто из нас двоих больше нуждался в другом.
Иногда я смотрю на стену, которую когда-то обклеил чужими словами обо мне, и не понимаю, почему мне кажется, что они…
Но я больше не хочу строить свою жизнь исключительно вокруг конечного результата.
Мне гораздо важнее каждый день становиться человеком, которым я сам могу гордиться.
Потому что если фундамент есть – дальше можно строить что угодно.
А если фундамента нет, даже самый красивый дом однажды начнёт трескаться.
Поэтому сейчас я именно этим и занимаюсь.
Достраиваю фундамент.
Такой, который выдержит следующий удар.
Я о…
О том, что я хочу хотя бы один раз в жизни по-настоящему рискнуть.
Не потому, что мне кто-то гарантировал результат.
А потому, что мне было бы гораздо страшнее никогда не попробовать.
Я посмотрел это видео впервые за несколько месяцев.
И заплакал…
Не потому, что увидел человека, который всё сделал правильно.
Наоборот.
Я увидел человека, который когда-то очень ясно понимал, зачем он всё это начал.
И понял, что…
730 / Я всё ещё здесь
Последний большой текст я писал здесь где-то четыре месяца назад
И если бы мне нужно было сейчас одним предложением объяснить, почему я почти ничего не писал всё это время, думаю сказал бы:
я просто не понимал, что происходит в моей жизни.
В какой-то момент я потерял ощущение нити.
Не то чтобы произошло что-то конкретное. Наоборот – произошло слишком много всего.
Здоровье. Работа. Деньги. …
Постов пока не будет, не знаю насколько, занимаюсь здоровьем.
Из большого списка выделю МКБ F32.2 / F33.2 если кто-то сталкивался с подобным – напишите в лс, буду благодарен за любой адекватный совет.
Берегите себя.
730 / после театра
9 мая впервые за долгое время сходил в БДТ.
Вышел оттуда другим.
Спектакль был про Освенцим.
Про людей,
которые настолько привыкли к смерти,
что продолжали жить рядом с ней.
Но сильнее самой жестокости меня пробил один момент – заключённый лежал на полу и повторял:
«Я не хочу вставать.
Даже если за мной придут –
я всё равно не встану».
Другие пытались его поднять.
Потом уходили.
А он продолж…
19.
Странно смотреть
на себя десятилетней давности
и понимать,
что внутри всё ещё живёт тот же человек.
Просто теперь
он наконец начинает
себя выбирать.
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @apparentlykoch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Шаблоны для презентаций | Powerpoint шаблоны @powerpointrus · 34,866 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KOCH | THE730PROJECT” (@apparentlykoch), 152 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apparentlykoch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
