Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 上海(丽春院)高端会所(点评榜)

Channel

上海(丽春院)高端会所(点评榜)

@apm616

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,695subscribers

+130 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001537620020
TypeChannel
Username@apm616
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/apm616

Growth

1,5651,6951,63020 August 2026 — 1,565 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,565 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,584 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,695 subscribers20 August 202627 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,546–1,715 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 05:171,695+111
24 Aug 2026, 12:471,584+19
21 Aug 2026, 00:561,565no change
20 Aug 2026, 22:461,565first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.66%
avg views ÷ 1,695 subscribers
Avg views / post
147
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held17 (6 August 202620 August 2026)
Views total2,348
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 12s
Average length
5m 12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC19 viewsread 20 August 2026

#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 同城男女约炮资源 📢 上海技师 📢 深圳本地 SPA 会所|95/96 专属服务 高端臻选 📢 SM约炮交友群 📢 汕头女园 📢 深圳青楼 📢 站街扫街探店spa 📢 南京车神 |【全城精品资源】 📢 郑州平价约炮 📢 廊坊上门 💎廊坊外围 💎廊坊修车 💎廊坊约炮 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口:@sooo

Signed SOSO搜搜

20 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC33 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

在 Telegram 里找内容,先打开 SOSO 搜搜。 频道、群组、帖子、贴纸都可以搜;也可以从发现页继续浏览。

Signed SOSO搜搜

20 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC30 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

😶😓➖4️⃣🔤➖4️⃣🔤 ⏱️服务时间50分钟,出水次数不限 制服诱惑,黑丝、情趣吊 A4 大熊妹 00后 御姐 人妻 水娃应有尽有 类型多多,出勤多多,配合度高,VIP享受,纯🐍游遍全身 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤📱📱 #营业时间12:00-凌晨2:00 地址 :#长宁 #徐汇 #普陀 #浦东 😒 二人同行优惠:6️⃣0️⃣ 三人同行优惠:1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ 五人同行优惠:2️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ 😒 长宁区水城路 虹桥路 价格498-598 😒 普陀区长寿路 顺义路 价格430-498 😒 普陀区【T台海选】699 😒 徐汇区徐家汇南丹东路体育馆 价格430-598 😒 浦东新区 陆家嘴 598 😒 联系人:@z599990 😍😍😍😍 本人是住店客服 其他店都有助理接待 所有门店都是平价 没有任何议价行为可以到店买美团 感谢各位新老客5年的支持 所有店预约推荐红牌蛋蛋后

Signed 八妹 4T/海选🔥

16 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC115 views0 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

徐汇 好评 999

Signed 八妹 4T/海选🔥

16 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC105 viewsread 20 August 2026

999号非常好,服务很好,按摩到位,小姐姐也特别健谈,情绪价值满满,非常有感觉。下次还来点咱们小姐姐☺️

Signed 八妹 4T/海选🔥

16 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC110 viewsread 20 August 2026

【上海丽春院ty报告】 【时间】:8.9 【颜值评分】:9 【服务评分】:10 【态度评分】:9 【综合评分】:9 【真实评价】:服务很全,很爽,性价比超高 【狼友留名】 注(10分为满分)

Signed 八妹 4T/海选🔥

16 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC109 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

不方便加微信QQ的 加 我与你号 QQ:3793340180 与你号:sm9933 电话:13166326896

Signed 八妹 4T/海选🔥

15 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC131 viewsread 20 August 2026

【上海丽春院ty报告】 【时间】:8.15 【服务评分】:9 【态度评分】:9 【出击技师】:? 【真实评价】: 终于台风结束了可以出门 第一时间约了8妹 顺了利打车20min到达战场 妹子很热情 很健谈 皮肤白嫩细滑 摸得我爱不释手 先B再A 手法厉害 把本狼搞得起起落落 一看就是专业的 回到正面 继续被上下其手 最后臀推出货~ 出完以后 妹子还给按了一下腿 看出手法也很专业 大头和小头都相当舒服~ 【狼友留名】 cc蛋 注(10分为满分)

Signed 八妹 4T/海选🔥

14 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC144 viewsread 20 August 2026

【上海丽春院ty报告】 【时间】:7.11 【颜值评分】:8 【服务评分】:9 【态度评分】:8.5 【综合评分】:8.5 【真实评价】:店内环境还不错,服务该有的都有 【狼友留名】阿姆斯特朗回旋炮 注(10分为满分)

Signed 八妹 4T/海选🔥

12 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC192 viewsread 20 August 2026

77身材极品,服务态度很好,技术一流。爽爆了。

Signed 八妹 4T/海选🔥

11 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC93 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

浦东新区: 张杨路民生路 徐汇区:徐家汇体育馆 普陀区:环球港顺义路 青浦区:青河湾 黄浦区:人民路 长宁区:水城路 😎(联系客服拿小姐姐真实照) 😎(上海评论报告区) 😎(上海小姐姐相册) 😎(上海聊天交流群)

Signed 八妹 4T/海选🔥

10 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC190 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

好评 话不多说 📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱

Signed 八妹 4T/海选🔥

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @apm616. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 136,467 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“上海(丽春院)高端会所(点评榜)” (@apm616), 1,695 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apm616.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.