A thoughtful take on why UTXO architecture may be a better fit for the emerging agent economy. Read the whole post here: https://x.com/ApexFusion/status/2029604508938965492?s=20
❤6🔥2

Channel
@apexfusion
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
69,423subscribers
-1,922 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002053599013 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @apexfusion |
| Description | A Fusion Of The UTXO And EVM Worlds |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/apexfusion |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 69,423 | -662 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 70,085 | -441 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 70,526 | -21 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 70,547 | -147 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 70,694 | -90 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 70,784 | -81 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 70,865 | -83 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 70,948 | -81 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 71,029 | -59 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 71,088 | -61 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 71,149 | -55 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 71,204 | -44 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 71,248 | -37 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 71,285 | -60 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 71,345 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:29 | 71,345 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
127 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 52 | 40.9% | |
| ❤ | 40 | 31.5% | |
| ⚡ | 28 | 22.0% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 4.72% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.787% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 5 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A thoughtful take on why UTXO architecture may be a better fit for the emerging agent economy. Read the whole post here: https://x.com/ApexFusion/status/2029604508938965492?s=20
❤6🔥2
Reminder: we’re going live today to talk about Ouroboros Tachys and CIP-0177. Join the discussion on what Tachys means for Cardano partner chains and the broader Ouroboros roadmap. 🕒 3PM CET / 2PM UTC https://x.com/i/spaces/1OxwblnvNvoJB?s=20
🔥4❤1
This Thursday we’re hosting an X Space on Ouroboros Tachys and CIP-0177. We’ll discuss what Tachys enables for Cardano partner chains and the key points from the CIP debate. Join the conversation and share your perspective. 📅 Thursday, Mar 5th, 3PM CET / 2PM UTC https://x.com/i/spaces/1OxwblnvNvoJB?s=20
❤3
VECTOR Public Testnet is now in the Conway Era. Read more in the post below: 🔗 https://x.com/ApexFusion/status/2028480983557632219?s=20
👏6
Ouroboros Tachys is a CIP and this matters for Cardano's future as a platform. A new Cardano Improvement Proposal authored by Duncan Coutts and Philipp Kant has been opened for community review. It specifies Ouroboros Tachys: a consensus protocol variant designed for Cardano partner chains that delivers higher block production rates and substantially lower transaction finality times while preserving full compatibili…
❤4👍1
New article is out: https://x.com/ApexFusion/status/2022343560431898739
❤5🔥2
Quick reminder: we’re live today to talk about Ouroboros Tachys. We’ll discuss what Tachys enables for Cardano partner chains, how it fits into the broader Ouroboros roadmap, and why latency, finality, and specialisation matter for real-world use cases. Joining us are long-time Cardano contributors Neil Davies, Philipp Kant, Kevin Hammond, and Duncan Coutts. 🕒 3PM CET / 2PM UTC – join us in the Space. https://x.co…
"Tachys as a protocol variant allows to serve use cases where the higher and less predictable latency of Cardano mainnet is unacceptable from a user perspective." – Philipp Kant, Ensurable Systems https://x.com/ApexFusion/status/2021622690495238459?s=20
⚡3
Duncan Coutts on Ouroboros Tachys performance: Higher block production is one of the key advantages of the Tachys variant. As Duncan explains, for the same security parameters as Praos, Tachys delivers ~4x higher block production, simply by design. This is one of the core reasons Tachys targets low-latency, high-confidence execution for Cardano partner chains. https://x.com/ApexFusion/status/2021275803527594170?s=…
⚡1
“How should the Cardano community think about Tachys vs Leios? What’s the right mental model so people don’t see them as competing visions?” "Leios increases the throughput on Cardano mainnet, but is limited by the need to maintain a globally decentralised validator pool. Tachys improves both throughput and finality for partner chains, which have more freedom of operation. Tachys is designed to work with Leios, so …
⚡1
This Thursday we’re hosting an X Space on Ouroboros Tachys. We’ll talk about what Tachys enables for Cardano partner chains, how it fits into the broader Ouroboros roadmap, and why latency, finality, and specialisation matter for real-world use cases. We’ll be joined by long-time Cardano contributors: Neil Davies, Philipp Kant, Kevin Hammond, and Duncan Coutts. Set a reminder below. 📅 Thursday, Feb 12th, 3PM CET …
⚡3
Weekly recap is out: https://x.com/ApexFusion/status/2019837318409121841?s=20
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @apexfusion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 919,553 of 1,585,381entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Apex Fusion Announcements” (@apexfusion), 69,423 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apexfusion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.