Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Apex Fusion Announcements

Channel

Apex Fusion Announcements

@apexfusion

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,019subscribers

-50,326 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002053599013
TypeChannel
Username@apexfusion
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/apexfusion

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

21,01971,34546,1827 August 2026 — 71,345 subscribers7 August 2026 — 71,345 subscribers8 August 2026 — 71,285 subscribers9 August 2026 — 71,248 subscribers10 August 2026 — 71,204 subscribers11 August 2026 — 71,149 subscribers12 August 2026 — 71,088 subscribers13 August 2026 — 71,029 subscribers14 August 2026 — 70,948 subscribers16 August 2026 — 70,865 subscribers17 August 2026 — 70,784 subscribers18 August 2026 — 70,694 subscribers19 August 2026 — 70,547 subscribers20 August 2026 — 70,526 subscribers21 August 2026 — 70,085 subscribers22 August 2026 — 69,423 subscribers24 August 2026 — 68,625 subscribers25 August 2026 — 68,044 subscribers26 August 2026 — 67,554 subscribers27 August 2026 — 67,524 subscribers28 August 2026 — 67,357 subscribers29 August 2026 — 67,187 subscribers30 August 2026 — 66,912 subscribers31 August 2026 — 66,244 subscribers1 September 2026 — 63,484 subscribers2 September 2026 — 62,173 subscribers3 September 2026 — 60,144 subscribers5 September 2026 — 51,125 subscribers8 September 2026 — 39,928 subscribers11 September 2026 — 34,992 subscribers13 September 2026 — 33,145 subscribers14 September 2026 — 32,217 subscribers16 September 2026 — 30,618 subscribers19 September 2026 — 29,310 subscribers25 September 2026 — 26,349 subscribers4 October 2026 — 24,434 subscribers8 October 2026 — 23,475 subscribers12 October 2026 — 23,153 subscribers14 October 2026 — 22,931 subscribers15 October 2026 — 22,725 subscribers16 October 2026 — 22,655 subscribers17 October 2026 — 22,591 subscribers18 October 2026 — 22,403 subscribers19 October 2026 — 22,352 subscribers20 October 2026 — 22,312 subscribers21 October 2026 — 22,114 subscribers22 October 2026 — 22,023 subscribers23 October 2026 — 21,962 subscribers24 October 2026 — 21,877 subscribers25 October 2026 — 21,721 subscribers26 October 2026 — 21,678 subscribers27 October 2026 — 21,605 subscribers28 October 2026 — 21,418 subscribers29 October 2026 — 21,369 subscribers30 October 2026 — 21,316 subscribers31 October 2026 — 21,115 subscribers1 November 2026 — 21,041 subscribers2 November 2026 — 21,019 subscribers7 August 20262 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 87 days, net -50,326. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,470–78,894 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 10:4421,019-22
1 Nov 2026, 12:0121,041-74
31 Oct 2026, 11:2021,115-201
30 Oct 2026, 12:0021,316-53
29 Oct 2026, 09:1021,369-49
28 Oct 2026, 06:1621,418-187
27 Oct 2026, 03:0021,605-73
26 Oct 2026, 05:3621,678-43
25 Oct 2026, 06:2621,721-156
24 Oct 2026, 09:1121,877-85
23 Oct 2026, 11:3121,962-61
22 Oct 2026, 11:1822,023-91
21 Oct 2026, 02:1822,114-198
20 Oct 2026, 02:1922,312-40
19 Oct 2026, 05:0522,352-51
18 Oct 2026, 05:4622,403-188
17 Oct 2026, 07:4922,591-64
16 Oct 2026, 10:0122,655-70
15 Oct 2026, 07:4822,725-206
14 Oct 2026, 09:4422,931first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 115 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

127 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5240.9%
❤4031.5%
⚡2822.0%
👏64.72%
👍10.787%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 5 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Mar 2026, 17:09 UTC≈1,070 views8 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

A thoughtful take on why UTXO architecture may be a better fit for the emerging agent economy. Read the whole post here: https://x.com/ApexFusion/status/2029604508938965492?s=20

❤6🔥2

5 Mar 2026, 10:28 UTC≈1,020 views5 reactionsread 14 October 2026

Reminder: we’re going live today to talk about Ouroboros Tachys and CIP-0177. Join the discussion on what Tachys means for Cardano partner chains and the broader Ouroboros roadmap. 🕒 3PM CET / 2PM UTC https://x.com/i/spaces/1OxwblnvNvoJB?s=20

🔥4❤1

3 Mar 2026, 16:56 UTC899 views3 reactionsread 14 October 2026

This Thursday we’re hosting an X Space on Ouroboros Tachys and CIP-0177. We’ll discuss what Tachys enables for Cardano partner chains and the key points from the CIP debate. Join the conversation and share your perspective. 📅 Thursday, Mar 5th, 3PM CET / 2PM UTC https://x.com/i/spaces/1OxwblnvNvoJB?s=20

❤3

2 Mar 2026, 14:43 UTC831 views6 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

VECTOR Public Testnet is now in the Conway Era. Read more in the post below: 🔗 https://x.com/ApexFusion/status/2028480983557632219?s=20

👏6

16 Feb 2026, 16:01 UTC913 views5 reactionsread 14 October 2026

Ouroboros Tachys is a CIP and this matters for Cardano's future as a platform. A new Cardano Improvement Proposal authored by Duncan Coutts and Philipp Kant has been opened for community review. It specifies Ouroboros Tachys: a consensus protocol variant designed for Cardano partner chains that delivers higher block production rates and substantially lower transaction finality times while preserving full compatibili…

❤4👍1

13 Feb 2026, 16:14 UTC649 views7 reactionsread 14 October 2026

New article is out: https://x.com/ApexFusion/status/2022343560431898739

❤5🔥2

12 Feb 2026, 09:53 UTC587 viewsread 14 October 2026

Quick reminder: we’re live today to talk about Ouroboros Tachys. We’ll discuss what Tachys enables for Cardano partner chains, how it fits into the broader Ouroboros roadmap, and why latency, finality, and specialisation matter for real-world use cases. Joining us are long-time Cardano contributors Neil Davies, Philipp Kant, Kevin Hammond, and Duncan Coutts. 🕒 3PM CET / 2PM UTC – join us in the Space. https://x.co…

11 Feb 2026, 16:30 UTC535 views3 reactionsread 14 October 2026

"Tachys as a protocol variant allows to serve use cases where the higher and less predictable latency of Cardano mainnet is unacceptable from a user perspective." – Philipp Kant, Ensurable Systems https://x.com/ApexFusion/status/2021622690495238459?s=20

⚡3

10 Feb 2026, 17:38 UTC476 views1 reactionsread 14 October 2026

Duncan Coutts on Ouroboros Tachys performance: Higher block production is one of the key advantages of the Tachys variant. As Duncan explains, for the same security parameters as Praos, Tachys delivers ~4x higher block production, simply by design. This is one of the core reasons Tachys targets low-latency, high-confidence execution for Cardano partner chains. https://x.com/ApexFusion/status/2021275803527594170?s=…

⚡1

9 Feb 2026, 17:26 UTC390 views1 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

“How should the Cardano community think about Tachys vs Leios? What’s the right mental model so people don’t see them as competing visions?” "Leios increases the throughput on Cardano mainnet, but is limited by the need to maintain a globally decentralised validator pool. Tachys improves both throughput and finality for partner chains, which have more freedom of operation. Tachys is designed to work with Leios, so …

⚡1

9 Feb 2026, 15:55 UTC369 views3 reactionsread 14 October 2026

This Thursday we’re hosting an X Space on Ouroboros Tachys. We’ll talk about what Tachys enables for Cardano partner chains, how it fits into the broader Ouroboros roadmap, and why latency, finality, and specialisation matter for real-world use cases. We’ll be joined by long-time Cardano contributors: Neil Davies, Philipp Kant, Kevin Hammond, and Duncan Coutts. Set a reminder below. 📅 Thursday, Feb 12th, 3PM CET …

⚡3

6 Feb 2026, 18:15 UTC398 viewsread 14 October 2026

Weekly recap is out: https://x.com/ApexFusion/status/2019837318409121841?s=20

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @apexfusion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Apex Fusion Announcements” (@apexfusion), 21,019 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apexfusion.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.