Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for апелька в сарае творит🍊 ушла

Channel

апелька в сарае творит🍊 ушла

@apelkaavatars111

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

59subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003006912727
TypeChannel
Username@apelkaavatars111
Descriptionапелелелелька магазин с аватарками на любой вкус!! // заказы сейчас принимаю ☆.⁠*⁠・ // вп/оп 80+ ❗❗ЛИЧКА : @questixx
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 4 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/apelkaavatars111

Growth

5912 Aug 2026, 20:49 — 59 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 21:00 — 59 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 20:4912 Aug 2026, 21:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58–60 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:0059no change
12 Aug 2026, 20:4959first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.2%
avg views ÷ 59 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held18 (4 October 20253 August 2026)
Views total103
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
42
Videos
1
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
58s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

179 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53437477922778887053821.2%
custom 53235955609119188772916.2%
2312.8%
custom 53257398061545776892212.3%
💔158.38%
💘137.26%
custom 5273819677385040066116.15%
💋95.03%
custom 536181194368851259584.47%
custom 535751922695538780873.91%
🙏42.23%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 179reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC19 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @apelkaavatars3

всем приветик!! вот я и вернулась, хахвха можете пересылать на свои каналы, чтобы больше людей узнало о моем возвращении🥹

29 Jul 2026, 11:43 UTC42 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @shchoulkoops

ЗНАЮ/НЕ ЗНАЮ .:*・゚☆ @apelkashining 😈 — знаю 💔 — не знаю ссылка для голосования ⇨ https://t.me/+r1ETVoexAycwZDJi

21 Mar 2026, 13:59 UTC136 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

кто-то ещё ставит мои аватарки🥹

💋6

31 Jan 2026, 19:02 UTC148 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @apelkashiningVideo

☆゚⁠.⁠* trusakovs, but it's olympics 2022 。✧ #edit #aa #love @apelkashining

💋2

7 Jan 2026, 16:56 UTC189 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @apelkashining

https://t.me/+PgkhQlvLBeFmOTgy это мой лайф номер 2. дело в том, что тот я забросила, и решила создать новый, который уже точно не буду забрасывать:) там будут всякие фотки, какие то спойлеры к эдитам и тому подобное, поэтому если вас интересно - заходите, рада каждому🤍

2 Jan 2026, 12:20 UTC211 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ребята, всем привет хочу сообщить вам, что скорее всего я не вернусь уже совсем. я очень любила и буду любить делать аватарки, но я не хочу делать их на заказ, за рдно точно. это действительно тяжело для меня, поэтому я приняла такое решение :( спасибо вам огромное за все🤍 если хотите следить за моим творчеством и дальше, то переходите на канал с эдитами @apelkashining. простите, что так неожиданно ушла, но по друго

💔15

8 Oct 2025, 12:10 UTC457 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ребята, всем приветт!! простите, что неактивна, просто сейчас я не в очень хорошем моральном состоянии, поэтому особо нет постов😒 скоро буду активна и начну делать ваши заказы!!

14custom 534374779227788870512custom 53235955609119188779custom 53257398061545776893custom 53575192269553878082💘1

6 Oct 2025, 13:58 UTC441 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

всем добрый деньь!!) утром не было времени написать, поэтому вот так вот поздно как вы? как в школе??

💋1

5 Oct 2025, 16:24 UTC455 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026

хочу задать такой вопрос: ━⁠☆゚⁠.⁠*` считаете ли вы меня легендой и почему, если да?? просто интересно посмотреть, есть ли такие люди, сколько и впринципе причину, потому что я сама себя оценить не могу🥳

custom 53235955609119188779custom 53437477922778887058custom 52738196773850400665💘3custom 53257398061545776891

5 Oct 2025, 12:14 UTC414 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

не забываем про реакции🤓 завтра буду делать заказыы

custom 53257398061545776896💘1

5 Oct 2025, 11:50 UTC701 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

・゚☆ отзыв: аватарки настолько красивые, что мне захотелось уже зиму. это одни из самых лучший зимних аватарок для меня❤️ -: ✧ :- стиль: #newyear, #wintersnow -: ✧ :- стоимость: 700 рдно, 500 рдно 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 за заказом >>> @questixx

7custom 53437477922778887053custom 53575192269553878083💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @apelkaavatars111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 860,220 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“апелька в сарае творит🍊 ушла” (@apelkaavatars111), 59 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apelkaavatars111.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.