Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Aoi Arakawa

Channel

Aoi Arakawa

@aoi_arakawa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

107subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001520842505
TypeChannel
Username@aoi_arakawa
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aoi_arakawa

Growth

106107106.57 August 2026 — 106 subscribers9 August 2026 — 106 subscribers16 August 2026 — 107 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 106–107 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:34107+1
9 Aug 2026, 08:46106no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:46106first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
73.0%
avg views ÷ 107 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.1
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held14 (24 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,094
Reactions total55
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1527.3%
🥰1018.2%
916.4%
🔥814.5%
💔47.27%
🍾35.45%
🤗35.45%
💋23.64%
👍11.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC49 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Где взять новую нервную систему ахах Моя устала очень

🤗3🍾1

5 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC64 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Приняли обе заявки на Аджисай, можно выдохнуть)

🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC67 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Кто будет?

  1. Сандей40%
  2. Генерал13%
  3. Даня7%
  4. Блэйд33%
  5. Бутхил0%
  6. Аргенти13%
  7. Авантюрин20%
  8. Рацио0%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC59 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Заказала рандомку, скоро вроде должна приехать, давайте попробуем угадать, кто мне выпадет ахаха Ну вообще, я всем буду рада, беспроигрышная гача

5

4 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC57 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Устала, у меня в последнее время ещё и бессонница( Вчера проснулась за 3 часа до будильника и крутилась эх

💔2

31 Jul 2026, 20:45 UTC85 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Заполнила заявки на аджисай, пожелайте мне удачи ахах)

🥰6

29 Jul 2026, 09:20 UTC104 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Все мы немного Вайз... Я тоже участвую в этой битве каждый день)

😁2

27 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC89 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Драка с детьми утром, перед работой, за мерч с Фаеноном отменяется...

💔2😁2

27 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC86 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Классно конечно придумали с коллабой ростикса и ХСР. Только несколько городов. Додо вот все говнили, но там участвовали все точки... Я конечно молчу про Пензу, но там нет многих других крупных городом...

🥰1

25 Jul 2026, 12:41 UTC83 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кто хочет выпить с королём героев? 🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷 Если узнали фесты, значит вам, как и мне, 100 лет)

🔥32

25 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC81 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Нашла эту имбу у себе в инсте))) Она правда качество сожрала... Кто знает этот прекрасный фендом ахаха? 🥂🥃🍶🍾🍷🍸🍹🍺🍻

😁3💋2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @aoi_arakawa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

Кто будет?

  1. Сандей40%
  2. Генерал13%
  3. Даня7%
  4. Блэйд33%
  5. Бутхил0%
  6. Аргенти13%
  7. Авантюрин20%
  8. Рацио0%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aoi Arakawa” (@aoi_arakawa), 107 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aoi_arakawa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.