Channel
@aochuan1
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,017subscribers
+163 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003351044143 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aochuan1 |
| Description | 致力于创作涩涩的大型倒模 傲川出品 必属精品！ |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aochuan1 |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
23,700 average views per post against 5,017 subscribers — an engagement rate of 472.2%. Across the 2,355 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,164–9,990 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 2.67% and 19.2%, with a median of 8.16%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 16 of 16 published in the window (0 exact, 16 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 379,010 |
| Mature posts only | 472.2% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 5,017 measured 11 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:zho · 2,355 channels · p10 0.77% · p25 2.67% · p50 8.16% · p75 19.2% · p90 38.6% |
| Position in cohort | 99.873th percentile · 57.9× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.019% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 5,017 | +137 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 4,880 | +26 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 4,854 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (3 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 379,010 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
69 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 61 | 88.4% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
伺候大哥，就得双份媚娘子才够玩😛～ 大哥看到此画面，有没有特别特别的鸡动呀～ 快点关上房门，手机开上飞行模式，来享受独属于你的“双人”模式吧！～ 全身加软的材质，手感好，像真人一样，肥肥肉肉的身材，包你食欲大开！每次一拍打都啪啪作响，不断的刺激心中的“野性”条～ 超好评的黑白双肉腿仙女 绝对超满足你的性欲！🥵🥵 黑丝诱惑白丝极品！超绝美肉腿不容错过！ 点击关注傲川看更多肉腿倒模哦！ #傲川 #肉腿 #媚娘子 #全身加软大肉腿 #半身倒模 #飞机杯
❤4👻1
https://s.tb.cn/c.0xi0aQ 8月的卷， 复制到浏览器打开
还有谁不知道媚娘子好玩？ 这大大大的屁股，拍打起来有没让你想起那个炽热的下午做的春梦？ 鼓鼓的阴户插入起来非常的方便，轻松到底！ 当然，这次视频主要展示的是媚娘的玉足，穿上丝袜，涂上精油，细细把玩，慢慢揉捏，每根脚趾都能动，灵巧真实，包你上头😸 #傲川 #腿模 #媚娘子 #一体加软的大肉腿@aochuan1
❤2
给我的黑巧克力洗洗澡吧~ #傲川乳娘pro黑皮版 #即将上市
真羡慕这小子，提前搞到手了 #傲川 #乳娘pro黑皮版 #即将上市@aochuan1
“艳后” #傲川乳娘pro黑皮版 #即将上市
❤3
展示一下新的穿搭，有没让你想起高中的学姐？😘 用带钢圈的奶罩子裹住这对不听话的大咪咪，玩起来果然是更加方便和涩情了🙈 爆乳JK学姐半身水野🥰 真的很难不冲一把！❤️❤️ 点击关注享超多傲川巨乳福利哦！ #傲川 #水野2 #飞机杯 #倒模 #全身加软就是舒服 #无胸托设计太像真人了
❤2
日常驯服肥臀娘的一天，从最初的有点不知如何下手，到现在水乳交融，屁股随我心意颤动，简直太有成就感了~ 俺简直成了屁股调教大师~ 希望以后对象也有这么大屁股。也这么软，这么肥，这么抗造~😁😁 我必给她调教成肥臀娘~ 点击关注傲川看超多涩涩倒模哦！ #傲川 #肥臀娘 #40斤超大超软大屁股
❤4
乳娘PRO 即将上岗啦,给她来一次全身的检查吧！ 这次的检查项目是乳头的通道。 左右两边的通道分别是螺旋交错，和肉筋包裹两种类型。 层层叠叠，各种颗粒交错，各种螺纹包裹，滴上润滑油， 直接原地起飞！ #傲川 #乳娘PRO #又大又软又爽的大柰子
❤4
正在备货中，过几天上架~ 看了那么多黑白配这那的，都是黑棍捅~ 是不是没想到有一天，咱也可以把牛子放在黢黑的大莱莱上面夹啊夹~ 异域的风情，带来全新的视觉和想象空间，希望玩的愉快😸 超色的大黑奶真是涩没边了！🥵🥵 点击关注傲川看更多涩涩巨乳哦！ #傲川 #乳娘pro #巨乳 #超巨乳
❤4
Telegram必备的搜索引擎，极搜JISOU帮你精准找到，想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_6721863297
Signed 极搜🔍资源搜索@JISOU
过几天上架 咖色乳娘pro😄
❤7😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @aochuan1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“傲 川 我们有又大又软又爽的倒模哦” (@aochuan1), 5,017 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aochuan1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.