How to tackle FMG exam? My best wishes and prayers for your success in exam🙏🙏✨️✨️

Channel
Eye by Anuradha Dhawan
@anuradhadhawaneye
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,052subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001400665445 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anuradhadhawaneye |
| Created | Between 1 February 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 19 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anuradhadhawaneye |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:18 | 6,052 | -10 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:19 | 6,062 | -5 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:09 | 6,067 | +6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:09 | 6,061 | +10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 6,051 | +2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:56 | 6,049 | +3 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 6,046 | -5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 01:59 | 6,051 | +2 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 10:38 | 6,049 | -3 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 15:20 | 6,052 | +60 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 21:00 | 5,992 | -17 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 6,009 | -18 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 6,027 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:35 | 6,030 | -11 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 6,041 | -16 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:29 | 6,057 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:29 | 6,062 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 6,067 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 6,067 | first reading |
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 5 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 56.4%
- avg views ÷ 6,052 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,420
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (5 January 2025 – 30 October 2026) |
| Views total | 20,491 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 17:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6m 02s
- Average length
- 1m 31s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
IBQ Ophtha
IBQ Ophtha
Image Based Ques Ophtha
https://www.youtube.com/live/yKuSSx4nMlE?si=MRm-UdbTbTDL7jzE
https://youtube.com/live/yKuSSx4nMlE?feature=share
Video from ..
FMG exam- I don't feel like studying. Reality check. #entbyrajivdhawan
https://youtube.com/shorts/R2HkhG75YNI?si=L-IxPkB7EPSg_OIT
https://www.youtube.com/live/yBDFxKaxn3I?si=MJUGkowCEaFMpIin
https://youtube.com/live/xHA-4ZFIptQ
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @anuradhadhawaneye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
All of the following are the charts used for testing disatnce vision execpt?
- ETDRS chart24%
- Snellen chart14%
- Pelli Robson chart45%
- Landolt chart16%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Atropine eye drops can be used in all of the following except?
- Fungal Corneal ulcer15%
- Anterior uveitis14%
- Viral Corneal ulcer15%
- Acute angle closure glaucoma56%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A patient who underwent cataract surgery 2 months back presents with painless decrease in the vision in the same eye. His OCT macula shows cystoid spaces. What will be seen in FFA of this patient?
- Flower petal leakage in macula36%
- Smoke stack leak in macula18%
- Ink blot leakage in macula24%
- Hyperfluoresecent dots in macula21%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following will be seen on the affected side in case of trochlear nerve palsy?
- Esotropia24%
- Exotropia33%
- Hypertropia32%
- Hypotropia11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
All of the following can present disc edema except?
- Papilledema8%
- Papillitis30%
- Grade 4 hypertensive retinopathy31%
- Grade 3 hypertensive retinopathy32%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following will be an important consideration while choosing IOL power for 1 year old child undergoing cataract surgery?
- Myopic shift due to changes in axial length45%
- Myopic shift due to changes in corneal curvature30%
- Hyperopic shift due to changes in axial length16%
- Myopic shift due to changes in lens shape9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2025 to 30 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@integratedlearningchannel · 34,702
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
@pharma_vid · 66,719
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026
@biochemistry_videos · 62,943
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 26 August 2026
@crackpsmwithdrneha · 49,739
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eye by Anuradha Dhawan” (@anuradhadhawaneye), 6,052 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anuradhadhawaneye.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.