Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for antropofilia discordianesimo concordianesimo, sofismi pretenziosi, parafilie, pensierini, diario adolescenziale, d'un teenager.

Channel

antropofilia discordianesimo concordianesimo, sofismi pretenziosi, parafilie, pensierini, diario adolescenziale, d'un teenager.

@antropofilia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

48subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001229191152
TypeChannel
Username@antropofilia
Description●LEGGI https://t.me/antropofilia/3 ⚠️NB: meri pensierini personali, ±artistici, nessuna vslenza medica o assolutismo sono intesi! Cfr. @OpereDiElio
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/antropofilia

Growth

4810 Aug 2026, 07:15 — 48 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 13:18 — 48 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 07:1510 Aug 2026, 13:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47–49 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 13:1848no change
10 Aug 2026, 07:1548first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.40%
avg views ÷ 48 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.6
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total31
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
270
Videos
34
Links
1,160

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 00:25 UTC1 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @iterPsicagogici

https://youtu.be/R22wp7UcktI menomale che puoi pronunciarle tu senza danni ~15:00❤ CORREGGERE. Esempio: 《 La gente infine ma non capisce un cazzo, non prendere sul serio le cose importanti》 STOP! 《 La gente è saggia e acuta. È accorta. È ascoltatrice e ha cura di ciò che merita attenzione.》 👍 A posto... https://t.me/iterPsicagogici/3416, + su @Antropofilia

9 Aug 2026, 01:55 UTC1 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @operedarte

https://youtu.be/-y5Mp6Xhs-w di 151eg una lezione valida di arte della percezione — e quindi della produzione di qualsiasi arte. Da ~43:00❤ Da vicino ciascuno è eccellente, e la critica buona deve mostrarlo! così come fece per le feci del Manzoni e gl'inganaggi rotti del Pomodoro e le tele rotte di chi non riusciva più a dipingere, o a capire che già un altro ne ha rotte e "ha rotto" anche troppo, e di per sé no

8 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC1 viewsread 10 August 2026

Io ho sentore che ancora dall'asilo alla Bocconi imperversa la falsità che esisterebbero azioni adiaforon e che gli oggetti sarebbero tutti adiaforon e nettamente distinti dai soggetti. Io non ce la fo con tanto liquame tossico-nocivo. Ho chiesto a una scemenza artificiale un elenco di autori che hanno negato la stronzata degli oggetti adiaforon che ancora intorbida le menti meno abbienti. Filosofi e sociologi e pe

8 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC2 viewsread 10 August 2026

Carmelo Bene (attore, regista e teorico teatrale) Nel suo teatro, gli oggetti e i corpi inorganici non sono mai neutrali: assumono un potere performativo capace di modificare ogni situazione. La sua "macchina attoriale" è una sperimentazione in cui oggetti e attori si fondono in una tensione continua tra organico e inorganico. Per Bene, il soggetto viene "fatto a pezzi" dalla materialità della scena, e gli oggetti di

8 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC1 viewsread 10 August 2026

Le macchine che sparano falsità MENTONO ? semplicemente SBAGLIANO, e così pure chi ne usa o spara bugie semplicemente per farsi bello: semplicemente spregia la verità. https://youtu.be/5m5uKxHgxeo?t=10m25s invece tu ami la verità... vero? In questo senso è apprezzabile perdere una vita, almeno la propria, per la dedizione. Eppure si tratta di significanti! puoi desautorarli! — Ma anche i corpi sono significanti.

6 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC2 viewsread 10 August 2026

Un uomo bussa alla porta del Paradiso. Una voce chiede: «Chi sei?» «Sono un ebreo.» La porta resta chiusa. «Sono un cristiano.» Ancora chiusa. «Sono un musulmano.» Silenzio. Alla fine risponde soltanto: «Sono un'anima pura.» E la porta si apre. Che la parabola sia autentica oppure no, cambia poco. La sua domanda continua a interrogarci: Chi sei, quando togli tutte le etichette con cui ti definisci? 🎥 L

6 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC2 viewsread 10 August 2026

A me stanno antipatici gl'inizi di videi che cominciano con spezzoni di frasi estratte dal corpo del video stesso SENZA preambolo. Aĺmeno dicessero "Alcune frasi del video! Due punti": e poì 'Inizio del corpo del video! Due punti!". — Chissenefrega! —👌

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @antropofilia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 19,485 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“antropofilia discordianesimo concordianesimo, sofismi pretenziosi, parafilie, pensierini, diario adolescenziale, d'un teenager.” (@antropofilia), 48 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antropofilia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.