4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,020–7,029 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 04:38
7,021
-6
7 Aug 2026, 01:47
7,027
-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:00
7,028
no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:55
7,028
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
74.8%
avg views ÷ 7,021 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,250
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
17 (4 June 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
36,740
Reactions total
978
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
851
Videos
79
Links
130
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 06s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,510 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,064
42.4%
🔥
373
14.9%
👍
357
14.2%
👏
225
8.96%
💩
203
8.09%
😢
127
5.06%
😁
123
4.90%
👎
38
1.51%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,510reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Правила вина
Я активно увлечен вином последние пять лет своей жизни и заметил прикольную особенность.
Когда человек только начинает пить вино, он открыто говорит что ничего не понимает и всё с интересом пробует и слушает. Через пару лет, он начинает думать, что понял что-то. И начинает вести себя глупо - навязывать своё мнение, которое у него не спрашивали, кичиться своими знаниями и совершенно не к месту рассказыв…
Дети
Держу в курсе - у меня отличные отношения с детьми, но с 12 лет начинается вот такое общение с сыном, который уехал с друзьями в лагерь.
Я так понимаю, у всех так?)
Письмо в будущее
Я не сторонник всех инфоцыганских техник, достигаторства и прочих бизнес-тренингов, где рассказывают как ставить цели. Но вот у одного знакомого сегодня прочитал в канале идею написать самому себе имейл и отложить отправку на 1 год - и мне эта идея очень понравилась.
Речь не про какие-то цели, бизнес достижения и планы. А просто письмо честное самому себе - что я сейчас проживаю, чем я сейчас в жиз…
Псж, месси, ямаль, барселона, диктатор мбапе, аргентина, рональдо и так далее - как же я рад что всё закончилось и еще примерно 4 года я буду слышать эти слова хотя бы не 100 раз в день!
Выебоны
Мне все часто говорят что я очень мало выебываюсь в инфополе. Типо мол любой недоблоггер уже бы 100 рилзов запилил только по случаю одной из наград за свой проект. А мы собрали все главные ресторанные награды в прошлом году за бар SILENCIO. И особо нигде про это не говорим. Ну это видимо особенность моего воспитания такая или подхода к бизнесу.
Тем не менее хочу рассказать, что в начале года мы получили кла…
Без боли не будет роста в бизнесе!
Офигенное интервью вышло у Соколовского с Дороничевым. Очень много бизнес инсайтов и классный анализ того, зачем надуваются огромные финансовые пузыри, в частности в сфере ИИ.
Ну и в целом, всегда его приятно слушать. Может и очевидные вещи, но красиво сказанные. Без боли не будет роста в бизнесе. Да и вообще, в жизни, всё хорошее дается через боль!
https://youtu.be/q7jH9N94mbM?s…
Про вино
Ну про Олега мы поняли и честно говоря, я с ним не согласен. Всё зависит от региона, есть отличные вина и по 30-50 евро. С другой стороны, когда ты миллиардер, то нафига тебе в это вникать и можешь пить лучшие в мире вина каждый день и голову себе не морочить.
А для вас, хорошее вино от скольки начинается? И вообще, вино моя аудитория пьёт? А то я постоянно слышу, как в мире падает потребление хорошего алк…
А если серьезно?
Вот заблочили все соцсети и что предлагается? Ну чисто теоретически, давайте представим что Макс прекрасная классная сеть наша отечественная и работает на всех устройствах. Ну допустим чисто, как фантазию.
И что с ним делать, если я хочу развивать бизнес за пределы России? То есть вот какие сегодня инструменты предлагает власть бизнесу? Как представить на международной арене свой бренд? Как реклами…
❤114👍62🔥22👏13💩3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @antony_crow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 61,557 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Antony Crow” (@antony_crow), 7,021 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antony_crow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
