Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Anton S Live

Channel

Anton S Live

@antonsreserve

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

148,445subscribers

-864 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003234925716
TypeChannel
Username@antonsreserve
DescriptionНовый официальный канал легендарного коммьюнити сплетников
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/antonsreserve

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@sharemed/2777417 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC@antonsreserve/24365 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC1.0015 hours
@sharemed/2837319 Sept 2026, 20:43 UTC@antonsreserve/27236 · this entry20 Sept 2026, 04:27 UTC1.007.7 hours
@sharemed/2836919 Sept 2026, 15:26 UTC@antonsreserve/27247 · this entry20 Sept 2026, 05:55 UTC1.0014 hours
@sharemed/2874011 Oct 2026, 06:03 UTC@antonsreserve/28940 · this entry11 Oct 2026, 09:16 UTC0.973.2 hours
@sharemed/2888121 Oct 2026, 18:48 UTC@antonsreserve/29854 · this entry21 Oct 2026, 19:28 UTC0.9741 minutes
@sharemed/2875712 Oct 2026, 06:01 UTC@antonsreserve/29002 · this entry12 Oct 2026, 08:26 UTC0.962.4 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@sharemed12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.983.9 hours@sharemed (12–0)
@bloknot_star9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9658 minutes@bloknot_star (9–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 21 of the 21 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,524 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

148,199149,456148,827.5148,4457 August 202611 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 97 days, net -864. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 148,010–149,645 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 22:20148,445+246
9 Nov 2026, 22:01148,199-67
8 Nov 2026, 13:46148,266-6
7 Nov 2026, 04:30148,272-18
6 Nov 2026, 02:56148,290+1
5 Nov 2026, 00:55148,289-42
4 Nov 2026, 00:49148,331-37
3 Nov 2026, 04:17148,368-18
2 Nov 2026, 05:30148,386-40
1 Nov 2026, 06:54148,426-43
31 Oct 2026, 09:40148,469-11
30 Oct 2026, 13:10148,480-40
29 Oct 2026, 13:48148,520-2
28 Oct 2026, 10:09148,522-40
27 Oct 2026, 10:16148,562-52
26 Oct 2026, 07:19148,614-32
25 Oct 2026, 05:07148,646-37
24 Oct 2026, 01:29148,683-41
23 Oct 2026, 04:57148,724-29
22 Oct 2026, 02:28148,753first reading

Engagement

1,890 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 201 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.37%
avg views ÷ 148,445 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,900
532 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
532
of 1,890 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held1,890 (7 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total5,817,481
Reactions total129,407
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈20,400
Videos
≈9,700
Links
≈12,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6h 42m
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 438 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

260,919 reactions across 998 posts, in 71 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣37,83814.5%
🤡33,40912.8%
🤮32,95312.6%
❤30,91311.8%
😁21,4198.21%
🔥14,3985.52%
👍10,0523.85%
😱8,9843.44%
😢8,2483.16%
🤯7,5372.89%
💩6,4802.48%
🤬6,2742.40%
💯5,8982.26%
🥴5,4272.08%
💊5,2302.00%
👏2,1630.829%
🥰2,0570.788%
😭2,0240.776%
🤔1,9880.762%
🕊1,4480.555%
51 further kinds16,1796.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 260,919 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 20 September 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
51
across the posts below
Posts paid on
25
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @antonsreserve. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 20 September 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 338 of 532 posts held from the last 30 days (63.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 15:28 UTC≈1,600 views67 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

И точка! 🔗VPN БЕЗ ПЕРЕБОЕВ⚡️

🤡42👍9😁8🖕6🤣2

Signed A S

13 Nov 2026, 14:16 UTC≈9,090 views202 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Младшая дочь Брюса Уиллиса и Деми Мур ждёт ребёнка 🔗VPN БЕЗ ПЕРЕБОЕВ⚡️

🙈114❤51😐13🕊5🤣5🤮5👍4👏4

Signed A S

13 Nov 2026, 14:02 UTC≈9,730 views13 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

#Неунывающие_децибелы 🎧 Присылаем 4 последних трека из своего плейлист. 👌 ~ AnnReya - Пугало ~ DRÜID - Кто сидит внутри ~ Claudio Capéo - Laisse Aller ~ AIDAN - Cowboys Don't Cry 🔗VPN БЕЗ ПЕРЕБОЕВ⚡️

👍8🤡3🤔1😭1

Signed Местный Шериф

13 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC≈9,470 views96 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

⚡️Однофамильцам экстремистов заморозят счета Банки могут начать массово блокировать счета Ивановым, Смирновым, Кузнецовым и другим россиянам с популярными фамилиями, пишут «Известия». Новым основанием для заморозки денег станет частичное совпадение ФИО и даты рождения с данными человека из списка Росфинмониторинга. Эксперты предупреждают, что число блокировок может вырасти на 15–25%. ❗️Сегодня совпала фамилия, зав…

🤡73💊6❤5🖕4🤣3🔥2😱2👍1

Signed PapaClick

13 Nov 2026, 13:18 UTC≈11,700 views310 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

✨Бюджетный костюм на Хэллоуин от Ани Седоковой 🔗VPN БЕЗ ПЕРЕБОЕВ⚡️

🤮185🤣65🥴21💩16❤9😱5🔥4🤡4

Signed Местный Шериф

13 Nov 2026, 11:55 UTC≈14,300 views122 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#мемарио 🔗VPN БЕЗ ПЕРЕБОЕВ⚡️

😁71🔥23🤣15❤8😱3🐳1👎1

Signed Местный Шериф

13 Nov 2026, 10:08 UTC≈17,900 views140 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🤔Каждый третий россиянин старше 60 лет готов отказаться от сайта из-за проблем с сертификатами безопасности. По данным Russian Field, 32% пожилых пользователей просто не станут открывать сайт, если браузер перестанет его загружать из-за сертификатов. Среди молодёжи 18–29 лет таких лишь 19%. 🔒Новая реальность больно бьет по свободе и объяснят, почему так даже лучше. Не привыкли к цифровому поводку? Попробуйте 3APES …

❤33👍16💯14🔥14🙏14✍12🤡12⚡11

Signed PapaClick

13 Nov 2026, 09:20 UTC≈18,700 views119 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🔴 СВЕЖИЕ СПЛЕТНИ! Лицо Dior Андрей Апполонов. Неприятный Пилягин врёт. Мой скандал с Гасанхановой. Водонаева и Рекс https://youtu.be/tzhHnauNn2o

❤48👍34🔥18❤‍🔥6🤮4🤡3💩2🖕1

Signed A S

13 Nov 2026, 09:00 UTC≈19,000 views246 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Как ваша пятница 13? #humor@darkshadows4 #scream #юмор #крик 🔗VPN БЕЗ ПЕРЕБОЕВ⚡️

😁145🔥62👻20🤡7❤5🤣5💩2

Signed Местный Шериф

13 Nov 2026, 02:58 UTC≈1,680 views79 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Важное сообщение для сплетников 👋 Есть инсайд, сплетня или слухи - делитесь с нами. Анонимность соблюдаем, информацию перепроверяем и публикуем только действительно стоящее. Если хотите рассказать о скрытой жизни знаменитостей, писать сюда: @Irina_Cherlin Папочка Сплетников ❤️ 🔗VPN БЕЗ ПЕРЕБОЕВ⚡️

🤣70❤6👍3

12 Nov 2026, 22:34 UTC≈7,720 views113 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Это не сплетня, Миша земцов никогда не был успешным бизнесменом) а вот эскортом был! Он сидит дома, занимается делами Кристины, ребенка, она сама ни к чему не прикасается вообще, без него даже в магаз не может выйти. Деньги зарабатывает она. Ну а Миша просто на хозяйстве, инфа 100 процентов Если вы хотите поделиться своими сплетнями, воспоминанием или опытом на тему шоу бизнеса и знаменитостей. То пожалуйста напишит…

😁54👍32❤9👎7🤣5🤔4🌚2

Signed Редактор_которыйвсезнает

12 Nov 2026, 22:00 UTC≈8,880 views86 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#1 Максим Паташев из Что Где Когда- в метро напротив сидел, читал- такой же, как на экране: полноватый, в очках, в хорошем костюме, на него смотрели - покраснел от смущения #2 Не просто видела, но общалась с Валерией и ее бывшим мужем (тяжелая семейка), с Лолитой (без комментариев), с Галиной Вишневской - интересная женщина, с Гурченко - матершинница редкая, с Кобзоном - метр с кепкой, с Евгением Евстигнеевым - оче…

❤35😁21🤔15👍5🤣4🥴4🤗1🤮1

Signed Редактор_которыйвсезнает

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,890 posts we hold for @antonsreserve. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@antonsreserve edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 October 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Anton S Live” (@antonsreserve), 148,445 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antonsreserve.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.