Channel
@antizahirizm
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,245subscribers
+49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002141904051 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @antizahirizm |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 26 February 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/antizahirizm |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 1,245 | -9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 1,254 | +5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:02 | 1,249 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 1,248 | +5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:05 | 1,243 | +18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 1,225 | +38 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 1,187 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 1,188 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 1,190 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 1,186 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 1,190 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 1,191 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 1,196 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:10 | 1,196 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
591 reactions across 19 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 252 | 42.6% | |
| 👎 | 98 | 16.6% | |
| 😁 | 98 | 16.6% | |
| ❤ | 62 | 10.5% | |
| 🤡 | 14 | 2.37% | |
| 🗿 | 13 | 2.20% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 2.20% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 1.18% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 0.846% | |
| 🥴 | 5 | 0.846% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 0.677% | |
| 💊 | 4 | 0.677% | |
| 😐 | 4 | 0.677% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.508% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 0.508% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.338% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.169% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.169% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.169% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.169% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 591 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2024 to 21 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅ Сунна праведных халифов довод 📒 Сказал Посланник Аллаха عَلَيْكُمْ بِسُنَّتِي وَ سُنَّةِ الْخُلَفَاءِ الرَّاشِدِينَ الْمَهْدِيِّينَ عَضُّوا عَلَيْهَا بِالنَّوَاجِذِ، وَ إِيَّاكُمْ وَ مُحْدَثَاتِ الأُمُورِ، فَإِنَّ كُلَّ بِدْعَةٍ ضَلاَلَةٌ "Вам следует придерживаться моей Сунны и Сунны праведных халифов, ведомых правильным путём, ни в чём не отступая от этогo и полностью избегая новшеств, ибо каждое нововведение …
👍43❤10
На всякий случай повторю Абу Джахлии, что он зиндик. Земля тесная, не тесная, и прочие угрозы быка, которого зажали в угол - оставь таким же быкам, как ты Я давно уже понял что с быками надо не бодаться по бычьи, а использовать человеческие изобретения типа холодного и прочего оружия, когда они пробуют тебя забодать. Оставь свой детский сад, ничтожество
👍24👎10❤🔥3👏2🔥2🤡2
Как самый знающий человек на Земле, знающий Ислам лучше всех ученых за 1400 лет, читает Коран
😁11🤡3❤1❤🔥1👎1
✅ Ширк имама Ахмада для Абу Джахлии? 💠 Сказал имам Ахмад: اسْتَعْمَلَتِ الأُمَّةُ السُّنَّةَ مِنَ النَّبِيِّ عَلَيْهِ السَّلاَمُ وَمِنْ أَصْحَابِهِ , إِلاَّ مَنْ دَفَعَ ذَلِكَ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْبِدَعِ وَالْخَوَارِجِ وَمَا يُشْبِهُهُمْ , فَقَدْ رَأَيْتَ إِلَى مَا قَدْ خَرَجُوا "Вся Умма использовала Сунну от Пророка (мир ему) и сунну его сподвижников - кроме тех кто отвергает это - нововведенцев, хариджитов и им подоб…
👍17❤4👎1
✅ Ибн Мас'уд - мушрик для Абу Зиндикии? 💠 Сказал имам ан-Насаи: الْحُكْمُ بِاتِّفَاقِ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ أَخْبَرَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْعَلَاءِ قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو مُعَاوِيَةَ ، عَنِ الْأَعْمَشِ ، عَنْ عُمَارَةَ - هُوَ ابْنُ عُمَيْرٍ - عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ يَزِيدَ قَالَ: «أَكْثَرُوا عَلَى عَبْدِ اللهِ ذَاتَ يَوْمٍ، فَقَالَ عَبْدُ اللهِ : إِنَّهُ قَدْ أَتَى عَلَيْنَا زَمَانٌ وَلَسْنَا نَقْضِي، وَلَسْنَا هُن…
👍19❤2👎2🔥2
✅ Ибн Аббас - мушрик для Абу Зиндикии? 📚 Передал аль Бейхакы с достоверным иснадом от Убейдуллаха Ибн Аби Язида, одного из достоверных табиинов: سَمِعْتُ عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ عَبَّاسٍ رَضِىَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمَا إِذَا سُئِلَ عَنْ شَىْءٍ هُوَ فِى كِتَابِ اللَّهِ قَالَ بِهِ وَإِذَا لَمْ يَكُنْ فِى كِتَابِ اللَّهِ وَقَالَهُ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ -صلى الله عليه وسلم- قَالَ بِهِ وَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ فِى كِتَابِ اللَّهِ وَلَمْ يَقُل…
❤24👎2👍1🔥1
✅ Умар ибн аль Хаттаб впал в ширк по мнению дегенерата Абу Бид'ии? 📚 Передал имам ан Насаи с достоверным иснадом от Шурейха: أَنَّهُ كَتَبَ إِلَى عُمَرَ يَسْأَلُهُ فَكَتَبَ إِلَيْهِ أَنْ اقْضِ بِمَا فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ فَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ فَبِسُنَّةِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ وَلَا فِي سُنَّةِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ و…
👍24👎5❤2
Абу шубухат предостерегает от ваххабитов и книг Таухида Что еще ожидать от пакистанского зиндика?
👍16
Photo, posted without a caption
👍9
Voice message, posted without a caption
😁18🤣13👍4👎4🤬2🥱1😱1
Отпор захиритам pinned «✅ Пороки захиритов (1) 📒 Казалось бы, все четко звучит и красиво - довод только Коран и Сунна, следуем только за откровением, нет в религии кыяса и суждения по аналогии, это привнесение того чего не узаконил Аллах, и тд и тп. 📚 Однако этим захириты выбили…»
Опа, это что кыяс начали делать? А как же "дин"? Вы что поклоняетесь монахам и священникам и ввели в религию ширк?
😁36👍8🤡4🤨1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @antizahirizm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Отпор захиритам” (@antizahirizm), 1,245 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antizahirizm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.