Channel
@antitelegramscammer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,167subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001950463185 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @antitelegramscammer |
| Description | Channel diwujudkan untuk meningkatkan kesedaran orang ramai berkaitan kegiatan penipuan (scam) dan pancingan data (phishing) di Telegram. Pastikan group anda selamat dan bebas daripada aktiviti scam dan phishing. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/antitelegramscammer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 7,167 | +12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 7,155 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 7,158 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 7,157 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 7,157 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 30 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
230 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 137 | 59.6% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 7.39% | |
| 🤨 | 17 | 7.39% | |
| 🤬 | 16 | 6.96% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 5.22% | |
| 🏆 | 10 | 4.35% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 3.91% | |
| 😍 | 6 | 2.61% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 2.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 230reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2025 to 18 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 Fungsi terbaharu Telegram membolehkan automasi bot pada akaun personal pengguna. Pautkan Hang Nadim pada akaun anda dan bot akan mengesan dan membuang link scam @ lucah yang dihantar ke private message (PM). sumber: https://telegram.org/blog/ai-bot-revolution-11-new-features/id?setln=ms#automasi-bual-dalam-profil
👍27💯13👎3🤨1
📰 Jurutera hilang RM27,000 ditipu sindiket seks dalam talian https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2026/04/1536230/jurutera-hilang-rm27000-ditipu-sindiket-seks-dalam-talian Tue, 21 Apr 2026 09:50:54 More news on @MYnewsfeed
🤨16🤬10😭6👎3
📰 Man loses RM500,000 in oil palm land leasing scam in Kluang https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2026/02/14/man-loses-rm500000-in-oil-palm-land-leasing-scam-in-kluang/209142 Sat, 14 Feb 2026 08:38:11 More news on @MYnewsfeed
👍8😍2
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Bp6jughrD/
👍9👎5🏆1
https://www.facebook.com/KemKewangan/photos/awas-berita-palsu-%EF%B8%8Forang-ramai-dinasihatkan-agar-berhati-hati-dengan-penyebaran-/1364938335670307/
👍9🤬2👎1
Penang real estate agent loses RM760,000 in ‘Casino Marina Bay’ online investment scam – Malay Mail Online Sat, 03 Jan 2026 10:02:30
👍9😍2🏆1
Banteras Scammer di Telegram pinned a photo
Akauntan rugi RM138,180 terpedaya skim pelaburan tidak wujud – Berita Harian Thu, 01 Jan 2026 08:22:49
🤯5👍3
https://latellagelato.com/voice-cloning-scams-explained-how-they-work-and-how-to-protect-yourself
👍11
Banteras Scammer di Telegram pinned a photo
https://semakmule.rmp.gov.my/
👍12💯4
🎉 Penambahbaikan terakhir bot untuk tahun 2025. Bagi membanteras aktiviti scam yang berleluasa sekarang, kini bot hadir dengan fungsi untuk menghalang ahli baru menyertai kumpulan daripada menghantar sebarang mesej pada 24 jam pertama. Fungsi ini diaktifkan secara automatik dan scammer tidak akan dapat menghantar mesej dalam tempoh 24 jam. Pentadbir kumpulan boleh menetapkan aturan seperti di bawah: !joinmute 0 Di…
👍21🏆3😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @antitelegramscammer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 195,656 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Banteras Scammer di Telegram” (@antitelegramscammer), 7,167 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antitelegramscammer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.