winners can dm me @scarycat19

Channel
AEN // Anti-Extortion Network
@antiextnet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
636subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003800643674 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @antiextnet |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/antiextnet |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:21 | 636 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 636 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 38.7%
- avg views ÷ 636 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 246
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (26 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,692 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 43s
- Average length
- 43s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🎉 5x csintduck monthly free key 🎉 Hosted By: @scarycat19 Requirements: • Join @antiextnet • Join @csintduckx ⬜ Participants: 48 Giveaway Ended 🍑 Winners: • @dbscraping • @lovechant • @gIuttons • @comvicts • @antisozialer
Signed Perks
new giveaway to celebrate our new drop?
- yes88%
- no12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
check the new work our sub-division did. https://t.me/AEN_subdiv/497
new giveaway soon.
Photo, posted without a caption
Greetings everyone, Im happy to announce a new partnership between AEN and CSINTduck, CSINTduck is a very cheap tool that includes more than 200+ modules and much features like gaming crosslinks [roblox, discord, xbox, minecraft], seek-now, oathnet and more than 800M stealer logs. The pricing is very cheap, going from 10$ per month for the cheapest plan to 35$ lifetime. check them out. https://csintduck.cc/ https:…
From now on, AEN will accept affiliations with AE channels. If you own a channel [e.g. Anti-Ext list, Com of AE ect...], AEN will most likely accept a collaboration with it. If you want your channel to be added feel free to DM me. - Right (@scarycat19)
Greetings everyone, Im here to announce that this AEN will still stay up, we are neither affiliated nor do we acknowledgr fear's actions. However, from now on this will only be the only authentic official AEN channel, this means that every other AEN channel will be a LARPed one. - Right
Greetings everyone, Today im happy to announce that AEN started a partnership with the tool called Datavoid.sh What's Datavoid? Datavoid is an OSINT + skiptracing service built for investigators, analysts, and intelligence professionals. Which features does it have? • Helios — Stealer logs intelligence (HudsonRock/Cavalier) • Axiom — US-wide people lookup, address insight & property intelligence • Axiom Atlas - …
stay tuned for more Giveaways
Greetings everyone, First of all i want to thank Aeter for updating our AE Nexus. We just added new groups, channels, and chatrooms, if you own or are apart of any AE group dm me or aeter to add it to the list. We are also looking for new staff members for our AE Nexus, obviously you need to respect some requirements to be apart of it, if you would like to join feel free to dm us. https://t.me/NexusAEN - Right (…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @antiextnet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
new giveaway to celebrate our new drop?
- yes88%
- no12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 245,274 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AEN // Anti-Extortion Network” (@antiextnet), 636 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antiextnet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.