Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

АНТИКОРРУПЦИЯ

@anticorrumpere

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

998subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001848052821
TypeChannel
Username@anticorrumpere
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/anticorrumpere

Growth

9981,0051,001.57 August 2026 — 1,005 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,005 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,002 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,003 subscribers14 August 2026 — 998 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 997–1,006 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:59998-5
11 Aug 2026, 00:461,003+1
8 Aug 2026, 10:361,002-3
8 Aug 2026, 00:331,005no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:191,005first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.3%
avg views ÷ 998 subscribers
Avg views / post
292
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,846
Reactions total133
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

133 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6347.4%
🔥3929.3%
1712.8%
👏86.02%
💯64.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC58 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Пару дней назад меня неожиданно позвали на обед. Красивое место при отеле, жара, прохладный зал, хороший стол, интересная компания… в общем, тот самый обед, который незаметно превращается в разговор обо всём на свете )) И в какой-то момент я подумал: а ведь у нас в Центральной Азии тоже есть своя магия. Только без свечей и карт: "Сейчас знакомому позвоню", "там свой человек есть", "через своих решим". И самое интерес

👍2👏21💯1

Signed Kodir Kuliev

7 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC90 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Немного августовского антикоррупционного чтения. Именно для тех, кому иногда нравится обнаруживать, что реальная жизнь чуть сложнее красивой презентации. Прочитал три свежих исследования ["Обзор ОЭСР по борьбе с коррупцией и добропорядочности — 2026", доклад Еврокомиссии "Снижение рисков коррупции высокого уровня в ЕС" и "Обеспечение добропорядочности" Мунгиу-Пиппиди и Парвановой]. Там есть несколько неудобных цифр.

👏3👍2

Signed Kodir Kuliev

6 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC127 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ОТВЕТ Да, вполне может быть взяткой. Тут фишка не в том, когда подарили телефон. Если дорогой подарок передали именно как "спасибо" за конкретное служебное действие чиновника, и это можно доказать, ситуация уже выглядит совсем не как обычный подарок. Причём заранее договариваться о телефоне тоже не обязательно. Грубо говоря, телефон не становится автоматически "сувениром" только потому, что решение уже подписано. Гл

👍2🔥2💯1

Signed Kodir Kuliev

6 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC125 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

После решения чиновнику дарят телефон "за помощь". Это взятка? // Qarordan so‘ng mansabdorga “yordam uchun” telefon berildi. Bu porami?

  1. Да, может быть / Ha, bo‘lishi mumkin70%
  2. Нет, решение уже принято / Yo‘q, qaror oldin chiqqan10%
  3. Нет, не было договора / Yo‘q, kelishuv bo‘lmagan5%
  4. Только если это деньги / Faqat pul bo‘lsa10%
  5. Только если чиновник попросил / Faqat mansabdor so‘rasa5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥3👍2

Signed Kodir Kuliev

6 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC157 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ОТВЕТ Чиновник отказался от денег. Но это не значит, что со стороны предпринимателя не произошло. Если следствие докажет, что бизнесмен действительно хотел передать деньги за нужное ему решение чиновника, то сам отказ чиновника не освобождает его от ответственности.То есть для такой оценки не обязательно, чтобы чиновник взял деньги или/и деньги оказались у него в кармане или/и он что-то пообещал или/и нужное решение

🔥3👍2

Signed Kodir Kuliev

6 Aug 2026, 02:24 UTC283 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Представьте: представитель компании, строящей новый жилой комплекс, предлагает деньги ответственному должностному лицу районного уровня, чтобы ускорить ввод объекта в эксплуатацию. Увидев конверт, чиновник сразу говорит: “Уберите это, я в такие вопросы не вмешиваюсь”. Представитель компании пытается еще раз, но чиновник категорически отказывается. В итоге деньги никто не берет, никаких обещаний не дается, решение по

👍2🔥2

Signed Kodir Kuliev

5 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC160 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ОТВЕТ В этой ситуации главный вопрос вовсе не в том, в чьи руки физически попали деньги, а в том, от чьего имени и по чьей воле помощник их получил. Вообщето это уже реальное уголовное дело. Здесь всё упирается в доказательства! Не в то, кто что утверждает, а в то, что следствие способно подтвердить. Согласно разъяснениям Пленума Верховного суда РУз по делам о взяточничестве, должностное лицо вовсе не обязано лично

👍3🔥3

Signed Kodir Kuliev

5 Aug 2026, 04:14 UTC647 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚠️Представьте ситуацию: предприниматель обсуждает с должностным лицом районного хокимията возможность "ускорить" решение земельного вопроса и предлагает ему деньги. Чиновник деньги в руки не берет и лишь говорит: "этот вопрос обсудите с моим помощником". На следующий день помощник получает деньги от предпринимателя, а вскоре вопрос по документам решается положительно... Теперь прокурор допрашивает чиновника. Тот утв

🔥3

Signed Kodir Kuliev

4 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC191 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Есть ли в этой (описанной выше) ситуации конфликт интересов? Этот вопрос я специально сформулировал так, чтобы он заставил немного глубже задуматься. Правильный ответ: самих приведенных фактов недостаточно, чтобы однозначно доказать наличие у Фарруха уже возникшего конфликта интересов. Но эту ситуацию следует оценивать и контролировать как потенциальный конфликт интересов. Причина в том, что для конфликта интересов

👍6

Signed Kodir Kuliev

3 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC309 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Фаррух работает главным специалистом в районной администрации. В его обязанности входит предварительное рассмотрение заявок предпринимателей на получение субсидий и выделение земли, а также подготовка заключений для рабочей группы. Компания "Orzu AgroBiz" подает соответствующий проект. Документы отвечают установленным требованиям, и Фаррух готовит положительное техническое заключение. При этом окончательное решение п

👍3🔥3

Signed Kodir Kuliev

1 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC403 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Korrupsiyaning eng xavfli nuqtasi -- noqonuniy ishning “oddiy holat”ga aylanishidir. Kichik murosa takrorlana boshlasa, u asta-sekin odatga; odat esa vaqt o‘tib “me’yor”ga aylanadi. UzDiplomat ushbu fikrimni alohida ajratibdi. https://t.me/uzdiplomat/14822

🔥7👍32

Signed Kodir Kuliev

31 Jul 2026, 11:32 UTC306 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Женщины в ЕС ежегодно недополучают около 358 млрд евро из-за гендерного разрыва в оплате труда (в среднем почти 3, 900 евро на одну работающую женщину). По данным Евростата, их почасовая оплата в среднем на 11,1% ниже, чем у мужчин, а большинство стран ЕС не успели вовремя внедрить директиву о прозрачности зарплат. Когда оплата труда скрыта, критерии продвижения непрозрачны, а доступ к руководящим должностям неравен,

3🔥3👍2💯2

Signed Kodir Kuliev

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @anticorrumpere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTCAnonymous Quiz20 voters

После решения чиновнику дарят телефон "за помощь". Это взятка? // Qarordan so‘ng mansabdorga “yordam uchun” telefon berildi. Bu porami?

  1. Да, может быть / Ha, bo‘lishi mumkin70%
  2. Нет, решение уже принято / Yo‘q, qaror oldin chiqqan10%
  3. Нет, не было договора / Yo‘q, kelishuv bo‘lmagan5%
  4. Только если это деньги / Faqat pul bo‘lsa10%
  5. Только если чиновник попросил / Faqat mansabdor so‘rasa5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 824,451 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АНТИКОРРУПЦИЯ” (@anticorrumpere), 998 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anticorrumpere.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.