https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/swear-on-the-quran-to-get-connected-2ksvldnv0 *the best censorship ever* #censorship #turkmenistan

Channel
Epics of Anti-Censorship
@anticensorship_epics
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,128subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001350155651 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anticensorship_epics |
| Created | 16 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anticensorship_epics |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 1,128 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 1,129 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 1,131 | +1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 1,130 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:31 | 1,131 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 1,133 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 1,135 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 1,134 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 1,135 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 1,133 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 1,134 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 1,134 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 28 February 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/1392873800648347650 #snowden #meituan #poem #censorship
MoneyMorph: Censorship Resistant Rendezvous using Permissionless Cryptocurrencies https://censorbib.nymity.ch/#Minaei2020a https://github.com/net4people/bbs/issues/71 #paper #year_2020 #moneymorph #cryptocurrency “只要加密货币还能用,我就能把消息藏在里面发出去”
SagerNet ---- 适用于 Android 的通用代理工具 https://t.me/sagernet/6 开发者保证不会闭源 #android #proxy #client #open_source
👆如上,Clubhouse 泄漏的*130万*用户数据
https://twitter.com/_benkaufman/status/1379760279324614664?s=19 #signal #twitter #cryptocurrency #mobilecoin
CVE-2021-3449: OpenSSL 拒绝服务攻击 #openssl #cve 说人话:不升级 openssl 到 1.1.1-k,默认配置下使用 openssl 的软件(包括 nginx 和 trojan-gfw 等),恶意构造的请求可以轻松让服务端崩溃。 PoC:一键崩服器 脚本小子或成最大赢家?
RFC 8996 - Deprecating TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 2021-03-23 #rfc #tls #deprecation https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8996/?include_text=1 —————— Comments from Student Main: 啥时候 deprecate SNI 啊
Signal 已在中国大陆境内被封锁 #signal #censorship 安全消息应用 Signal 的官方网站和通信服务的域名在昨日开始被防火墙屏蔽,它们的域名分别是 signal.org 和 textsecure-service.whispersystems.org。防火墙使用的方法是 DNS 污染和检测 SNI。 转自:Solidot(2021年03月16日,来源)
https://www.morningstar.com/news/dow-jones/202103153593/telegram-app-is-booming-but-needs-advertisers-and-700-million-soon-update 华尔街日报原文(付费墙警告): https://www.wsj.com/articles/telegram-app-is-booming-but-needs-advertisersand-700-million-soon-11615806001
Epics of Anti-Censorship pinned a photo
Shadowsocks 修改其项目描述 Shadowsocks 原来的项目描述 “A secure socks5 proxy, designed to protect your Internet traffic” 现已修改为 “A simple socks5 proxy, help you visit internet”。新的措辞中去掉了 "secure" "protect your traffic" 字样,取而代之的是 “simple” “help you visit”。 据猜测,这可能与 Shadowsocks 近期爆出的两个致命缺陷有关(内部代号“移花接木”、“延迟复读机”)。Shadowsocks 的流密码模式早已因各种致命的缺陷被社区不推荐使用,而其接班的 Shadowsocks AEAD 模式对于上述两个缺陷目前亦无法有效防御。 一句感叹:也许代理设计真的是在不断重新发明 TLS 吧。 更新:Shadowso…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @anticensorship_epics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Epics of Anti-Censorship” (@anticensorship_epics), 1,128 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anticensorship_epics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.