Channel
@anti_rober
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,523subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001217368654 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anti_rober |
| Created | 22 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anti_rober |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 1,523 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 1,526 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 1,527 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 1,527 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,337 |
| Reactions total | 272 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
272 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5192956369598172602 | 169 | 62.1% | |
| custom 5192769160563676583 | 90 | 33.1% | |
| custom 5402521799793581450 | 13 | 4.78% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 272reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#штучкидрючки Попался рилс, в котором девушка рассказывает о том, что создает всевозможные стикерпаки-шпаргалки для учебы. Маленькая часть меня всплакнула, что у нее такого не было 😅 потому что, на мой взгляд, это обалденно. Кому актуально, ловите артикул на один из стикерпаков #2944188959 (это озон) и переходите в магазин - там много всяких разных
custom 51927691605636765836custom 51929563695981726021
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 51929563695981726028custom 51927691605636765831
Решила не быть жестокой к своему потрепанному мозгу, отложить всех Ивановых и иже с ними и дать ему что-то бодрое, но легко усваиваемое) #тринадцать Кайф с первой главы. Маньяк выдает себя за одного из присяжных, мы знаем, как зовут маньяка, но не знаем, чье место он займёт - такие завязки мне еще не встречались) Ну и сам главный герой Эдди «Грин флаг» Флинн - обожаю (если честно, не могу вспомнить, когда в последн…
custom 519295636959817260214custom 54025217997935814503custom 51927691605636765832
Вчера начинала в бумаге, сегодня пробую аудио - очень мне тяжело, потому что XVIII в и стилизованный текст, а я за столько лет так и не научилась воспринимать подобные тексты. При этом в озвучке Всеволод Кузнецов - ого-го - я прям слушаю и кайфую от интонаций и тембра, но сюжет мимо меня, совершенно не могу сосредоточиться. А так хочется! Кто любит книгу, вам было тяжело в начале или сразу влились?
custom 519276916056367658313
📚ЗОЛОТАЯ ДЕВОЧКА/Элин Хильдебранд #fromrober_withbooks Вивьен всю свою сознательную жизнь провела на Нантакете: здесь она влюбилась и вышла замуж, родила троих детей, обрела друзей и стала популярной писательницей. И здесь же, однажды утром, ее насмерть сбил неизвестный. Так душа Виви попала на небеса с возможностью до конца лета наблюдать за своими, а т ж воспользоваться правом трех «тычков» - в помощь близким. Я …
custom 519295636959817260216custom 51927691605636765834
👋🏼 4/16 успешно и букет мини-гладиолусов за тысячу рублей Заглядываете в комменты - там небольшая распаковка #штучкидрючки
custom 519295636959817260230custom 51927691605636765833custom 54025217997935814503
📚СТРОПТИВЫЕ ДЕВЧОНКИ/Сьюзен Уиггс #fromrober_withbooks #строптивыедевчонки Если честно, я и не знаю, с чего начать отзыв. Может, рассказать о Морин - бойкой, но прилежной девчонке, которую мать отправила в исправительную школу за то, что отчим положил на нее глаз? Или о «прачечных Магдалины», работавших не только в США, но и в Европе вплоть до 1990-х и прикрывавших рабский труд, издевательства, торговлю мл…
custom 519276916056367658319custom 51929563695981726025
Отыграть назад, сериал 6 серий, HBO Мне о-очень понравился! По ощущениям схоже с чтением «Пятьдесят на пятьдесят» Каваны - когда уверен в разгадке, но чем дальше, тем сильнее тебя заставляют сомневаться, и в конечном итоге доводят до того, что ты начинаешь подозревать даже тапки, случайно попавшие в кадр. И я рекомендую смотреть не из-за ожидания вау-ответа, а именно из-за эмоций в процессе. И из-за актеров. Как-то…
custom 519295636959817260220
У Дины и Ани открыты предзаказы: ⚡️У Ани - «Нулевой пациент», мистический триллер в Треверберге, вымышленном городе, знакомом читателям по серии триллеров с Акселем Грином. В этом посте - подробнее и о книге, и о подарках за предзаказ ⚡️У Дины - долгожданное продолжение «Хеску» в двух томах, а почему в двух - вчитайтесь, пожалуйста, в этот пост от автора
custom 51929563695981726027
Клубничный тирамису - это вау, серьезно. Очень калорийно, очень сладко и очень балдежно 🤌🏻 Рецепт брала здесь Пы.Сы. При замешивании крема я бы рекомендовала сначала добавить процентов на тридцать меньше сахарной пудры и попробовать на сладость (сделать слаще всегда успеете), либо не добавлять сахар в клубничное пюре, тогда сладкий крем сгладит кислинка
custom 519295636959817260216custom 51927691605636765835custom 54025217997935814502
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 51929563695981726026
#случайныефото не случайные или картинки минувшей недели Пусть в картинках на память все будет картиношно, а все, что за кадром, пройдёт и забудется
custom 519295636959817260222custom 51927691605636765836
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @anti_rober. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,098,842 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кристина Робер (18+) Лайфстайл и книги” (@anti_rober), 1,523 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anti_rober.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.