16 measurements spanning 28 days, net +1,151. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,967–10,543 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 03:57
10,361
+77
3 Sept 2026, 11:56
10,284
+48
2 Sept 2026, 05:38
10,236
+32
1 Sept 2026, 03:58
10,204
+53
31 Aug 2026, 05:06
10,151
+31
30 Aug 2026, 07:54
10,120
+21
29 Aug 2026, 04:44
10,099
+28
28 Aug 2026, 04:02
10,071
+323
24 Aug 2026, 21:08
9,748
+387
21 Aug 2026, 08:25
9,361
+125
18 Aug 2026, 01:24
9,236
+87
14 Aug 2026, 17:08
9,149
-43
11 Aug 2026, 07:51
9,192
-16
8 Aug 2026, 02:01
9,208
-2
7 Aug 2026, 18:01
9,210
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:59
9,210
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 7 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.3%
avg views ÷ 10,361 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,080
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
22 (7 November 2025 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
8,150
Reactions total
223
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16m 30s
Average length
1m 50s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,320 reactions across 18 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
690
52.3%
🔥
358
27.1%
👍
164
12.4%
⚡
21
1.59%
❤🔥
15
1.14%
🤣
15
1.14%
😢
11
0.833%
💘
9
0.682%
😱
8
0.606%
🤔
8
0.606%
🕊
6
0.455%
🤩
4
0.303%
😁
3
0.227%
💋
2
0.152%
😨
2
0.152%
🤗
2
0.152%
🙏
1
0.076%
🤯
1
0.076%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,320 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2025 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anthonyshow_english. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 November 2025 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
I'M DOWN — Part 2
В прошлый раз I'm down означало «Я за! / Я в деле!»
I'm feeling down - мне грустно / я подавлен
А теперь добавляем всего два слова:
• I've come down with a cold.
И внезапно это уже:
«Я простудился / Я заболел»
come down with + illness = заболеть чем-либо
🤒I've come down with the flu.
🤧I think I'm coming down with something.
И это ещё не всё, что умеет DOWN 👀
Part 3?
I’M DOWN — и нет, это не то, что вы подумали 😂
Когда вас куда-то зовут и вы хотите сказать «Я за! / Я в деле!», попробуйте:
👉 I’m down!
— Wanna grab some pizza tonight? 🍕 — Yeah, I’m down!
А самое интересное — это далеко не единственное значение I’m down 👀
Part 2? 😏
На первый взгляд они звучат вполне нормально. Но именно такие ошибки очень часто делают ученики.
👇 Поехали:
❌ How is it called? -> What’s it called ✅
❌ I and my friend -> My friend and I … или Me and my friend... ✅
❌ Let's meet together -> Let’s meet ✅
❌ According to me -> In my opinion ✅
❌ Explain me -> Explain it to me
P.s В английском языке “according to” используется только когда ты ссылаешься на внешний источн…
🤯 Почему иногда можно сказать “he play”, а не “he plays”?
👉 I suggest that he leave the company - я предлагаю чтобы, он уволился
👉 We recommend that she go home - Мы рекомендуем чтобы, она пошла домой
👉 It’s important that he be on time - Важно чтобы, он был во время.
❗️Это не ошибка — это subjunctive
👉 После suggest / recommend / important
глагол = базовая форма (без -s, без is)
💡 Хорошая новость:
это не обязате…
Part 2 (OVER)
🤯 OVER — это не только «над»… и даже не только «слишком»
В Part 1 мы разобрали базовые значения,
а теперь — уровень сложнее 😈
Когда OVER — это приставка, он часто значит «слишком / пере-»:
▫️ oversleep — проспать
▫️ overthink — накручивать себя
▫️ overpay — переплатить
▫️ overdo — переборщить
НО потом английский такой:
“А теперь держись…” 😏
▫️ overtake — обогнать
▫️ overhear — подслушать
▫️ overlo…
Слово over — одно из самых коварных в английском. Это не только «над» — чаще всего совсем не над 😅 Всё решает контекст, и именно из-за него русский мозг часто ломается.
Если было знакомо — ты не один 😉
📌 Вся информация про мои онлайн-занятия по английскому для детей и взрослых — по ссылке ниже: 👉 [https://t.me/+kAoZnVC3tM1iMjYy]
Happy New Year 🎊🎄! — С Новым годом 🎆
All the best! — Всего самого лучшего ✨
Cheers! — За вас / будем 🥂
Here’s to a great year ahead! — За классный год впереди 🚀
🔴 Question 6 (choose the correct option)
A: I want to go to Japan one day.
B: Really? I ___ there! You’d love it.
been there30%
was58%
been there12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⚡4❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @anthonyshow_english. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🟢 Question 2 (Translate the sentence)
Я был в этом кафе много раз.
I have been to this café many times.79%
I went to this café many times.12%
I have gone to this café many times.10%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2025 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anthonyshow_english” (@anthonyshow_english), 10,361 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anthonyshow_english.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.