Channel
@ansar_dishni
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
677subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003382246505 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ansar_dishni |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ansar_dishni |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 677 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 678 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 678 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 28,864 |
| Reactions total | 761 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
761 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 376 | 49.4% | |
| 💯 | 148 | 19.4% | |
| 😁 | 143 | 18.8% | |
| 🔥 | 43 | 5.65% | |
| 🤝 | 33 | 4.34% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 1.84% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.394% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.131% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 761reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вы слышали от разных "бизнес-коучей": окружайте себя успешными людьми, дружите с богатыми, держитесь тех, у кого большие деньги, связи, бизнес и всё получается. Сегодня эта идея дошла и до части мусульманского общества. Я не бизнес-коуч и не психолог. Но одно знаю точно: в День суда многие будут искать не богатых и влиятельных, а бедняков и мискинов, чтобы те заступились за них перед Аллахом. Поэтому не спешите оце…
👍15💯7🔥1🤝1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
Я до сих пор помню. Часть четвёртая. После выхода из Грозного, в конце августа 1996 года — или, возможно, в первых числах сентября — мы добрались до нашего дома в Дышне-Ведено. В селе в тот момент было так тихо, будто войны вовсе не было. О ней напоминали лишь разговоры об отце: говорили, что он не вышел из Грозного, что его в последний раз видели отдыхающим, прислонившимся к железной сетке забора, что его замечали …
👍9😢2
Хlаъ.
😁55🔥2💯1😢1
Заметка для братьев: Психология жертвы — это не слабость тела, а состояние мышления. Она начинается в тот момент, когда человек заранее принимает поражение, убеждает себя, что от него ничего не зависит, и перестает искать возможности для действия. Напротив, психология охотника — это настрой человека, который даже в неблагоприятных обстоятельствах продолжает искать выход, инициативу и слабые места ситуации. Он не от…
👍30💯11🔥5
Жесткость не жесткость не знаю, но, кругом запахло ванилью.
😁21
Если без грима, то примерно такому деду и поклоняются ахматовцы.
😁57💯7👍5
Верующий не должен спешить за мирскими благами, славой или богатством. Настоящая спешка — это спешка к тому, что принесёт пользу в День Суда. Аллах призывает нас опережать друг друга не в накоплении имущества, а в благих делах: «Спешите же опередить друг друга в благих делах. Где бы вы ни были, Аллах соберёт вас всех. Воистину, Аллах способен на всякую вещь». 📚 Сура «аль-Бакара», 2:148 Он также напоминает, что воз…
👍20💯7
Photo, posted without a caption
👍38💯10😢5🔥1
Сообщение от подписчика: "Ассаламу алейкум, по поводу «даже женщин детей не пожалели» я просто хотел коротко поделиться как я вижу эту картину. Сайн хуа хильча куьг дякхча, ког бякхча, лазича ловр ду ас. Сой вуьйр вуй хиъча ловр ду ас, ам йиша, бера, нана хьийзича са дог 1ийжа до. Конечно, мужчины тоже не расходный матириал. Я ни чуть не уменьшаю значимость мужчин, но наверное мы так сотворены)) жертвовать собой рад…
🔥26👍8🤝6💯3
Часто слышу или читаю фразу: «Даже женщин и детей не пожалели». Получается, мужчин убивать, калечить или сажать — это как будто что-то само собой разумеющееся, а вот «даже женщин и детей» — уже особый ужас. Согласен, но… Иногда думаю: может, пора создать движение «Даже мужчины» и начать отстаивать право мужчин на жизнь — такое же, как у женщин и детей?
👍28😁8💯6👎1
Испания поддержала Палестину и жестко выступила против политики Израиля и США. Почти сразу усилился поток мигрантов из Марокко. Совпадение? Не думаю. В современном мире миграция становится таким же инструментом политики, как санкции или же военное вмешательство.
💯46👍5😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ansar_dishni. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 91,087 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ansar Dishni” (@ansar_dishni), 677 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ansar_dishni.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.