Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

『 𓏺𝗔𝗥𝗠𝗢𝗙 』

@another_armof

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

37,915subscribers

+467 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002019861993
TypeChannel
Username@another_armof
Descriptionقناتي الرسمية للتعاملات والبرمجه . راح اضيفلكم حسابي وقنواتي 🙂 @ArMoF اني
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/another_armof

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@wwwwqw/968914 Jul 2025, 15:32 UTC@another_armof/165 · this entry14 Jul 2025, 15:54 UTC1.0022 minutes
@another_armof/169 · this entry17 Jul 2025, 23:32 UTC@wwwwqw/970517 Jul 2025, 23:32 UTC1.00under a minute
@another_armof/231 · this entry19 Aug 2025, 10:56 UTC@wwwwqw/976319 Aug 2025, 10:57 UTC1.00under a minute
@wwwwqw/979914 Sept 2025, 12:33 UTC@another_armof/267 · this entry14 Sept 2025, 12:33 UTC1.00under a minute
@another_armof/169 · this entry17 Jul 2025, 23:32 UTC@cccc_pc/72917 Jul 2025, 23:32 UTC1.00under a minute
@another_armof/231 · this entry19 Aug 2025, 10:56 UTC@cccc_pc/79519 Aug 2025, 10:57 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@wwwwqw5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@wwwwqw (32)
@cccc_pc6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0011 minutes@cccc_pc (42)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 July 2025 to 15 November 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @wwwwqw. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

37,44837,91537,681.56 August 2026 — 37,448 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,489 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,553 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,659 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,721 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,800 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,915 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net +467. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,378–37,985 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:1437,915+115
11 Aug 2026, 12:3337,800+79
10 Aug 2026, 10:1137,721+62
9 Aug 2026, 07:5137,659+106
8 Aug 2026, 08:3337,553+64
7 Aug 2026, 09:0237,489+41
6 Aug 2026, 20:4637,448first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

382 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24163.1%
🔥338.64%
😁225.76%
❤‍🔥215.50%
🖕194.97%
👍112.88%
🏆82.09%
😴82.09%
🤣61.57%
💘51.31%
🎅30.785%
🥰30.785%
👏20.524%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 382reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2025 to 15 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @another_armof. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2025 to 15 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Nov 2025, 13:38 UTC≈137,000 views130 reactionsread 12 August 2026

عروض نار فعل اي بوت من الصانع باشتراك مدفوع شهري فقط 2$ فعل اي بوت من الصانع باشتراك مدفوع سنوي ب 10$ فقط لتنصيب نسخه كاملة مستقلة من الصانع مع صيانه وسيرفر وكافة الخدمات سعر 150$ لشراء سيرفر سنوي متوفر ب 50$ فقط ومتوفر رامات اعلى 150 و 70 $ تواصل معي هنا @ArMoF متوفر برمجة بوتات وتعديل ملفات ايضا معرف المصنع @M_AKBOT

88🔥17😁16👍9

9 Nov 2025, 12:05 UTC≈117,000 views62 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

.

24🔥9❤‍🔥8🏆8😴8🎅3👍2

27 Sept 2025, 00:03 UTC≈24,300 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @wwwwqw

*سولف وي سمسمي 🥹🫶💕*

🖕1912

18 Sept 2025, 12:30 UTC≈81,000 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

السلام عليكم متوفر سيرفرات واستضافات وسورسات وتفعيلات وبوتات وتمويل وبرمجه ومواقع وسورسات وبوتات للتواصل : @ArMoF

10

14 Sept 2025, 12:33 UTC≈67,400 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

『 𓏺𝗔𝗥𝗠𝗢𝗙 』: السلام عليكم : متوفر استضافة سنوية استضافة vps cpu 1 cpu 2.5 مع لوحة تحكم ودومين وشهادة ssl كاملة مع لوحة وتنصيب المتطلبات تدعم كل السكربتات والبوتات ويتوفر ملفات بوتات وبرمجه حسب الطلب وتفعيل بوتات . - لطلب تمويل القنوات الاعضاء ضمان متفاعلين وحقيقين كلهم بـ 5$ تمويل 300 عضو للقناة بـ 15$ تمويل 700 عضو للقناة بـ 20$ تمويل 1000 عضو للقناة TELEGRAM : @ArMoF يتوفر كتابة وتفعيل وتعديل بوتات ومواقع

12🤣6

6 Sept 2025, 11:03 UTC≈13,900 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

: ✨ نظام تفعيل البوتات المدفوعة ✨ ------------------ 💰 أسعار التفعيل: ------------------ - تفعيل شهري: 2$ فقط. - تفعيل سنوي: 10$ فقط. ------------------ ✅ بعد الدفع سيتم تفعيل بوتك مباشرة. ------------------ 📩 راسل الإدارة لإتمام عملية التفعيل. للتواصل مع الادارة : @ArMoF معرف المصنع : @M_AKBOT ⚙️

9💘5

27 Aug 2025, 11:48 UTC≈21,100 views15 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

👋✨ أهلاً وسهلاً بك! بوت الذكاء الاصطناعي 🤖💡 تم تحديث المصنع واضافة بوت ذكاء اصطناعي اصنع بوت مجاني الان

8❤‍🔥7

23 Aug 2025, 13:45 UTC≈7,520 views5 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @cccc_pcPhoto

بوت مصنع بوتات تلجرام ادخل واصنع بوت مجاني خاص بك @M_AKBOT 🪽

5

23 Aug 2025, 13:37 UTC≈13,000 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

هذا شغل البوت يعدل حقوق كل شي بالقناة ضيفوه يفيدكم @armof_bot

🥰1

23 Aug 2025, 09:24 UTC≈12,800 views9 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

(وما ينطق عن الهوى إن هو إلا وحي يوحى) يا رسول الله .

❤‍🔥63

19 Aug 2025, 10:56 UTC≈98,500 views11 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

⇜ اططلـق بـوت اسمـي حمص ⇜ الأفضـل ؏ـلى تيليجـرام 𓌗 ⇜ بـوت خـدمي + حمايـة + ذكاء اصطناعي + زخرفـة + همسـه .. والمزيـد ⇜ لحمايـة المجموعـات من التفليش والتصفير والاباحي .. الخ ⇜ اكثـر من 100 لعبة مسلية وجديدة ⇜ فقـط ارفعـني إشـراف كامـل الصلاحيـات ⇜ وسيتم تفعيـل البـوت تلقـائيـاً ⇜ لعـرض كيبـورد الاوامـر الخـدميـة إضغـط ➧ /cmds

11

12 Aug 2025, 16:25 UTC≈19,900 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

هذا يوزر البوت تكدرون تلعبون خاص وقناة ومجموعه @Ques25bot ❤️‍🩹

🔥73👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @another_armof. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 23,507 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“『 𓏺𝗔𝗥𝗠𝗢𝗙 』” (@another_armof), 37,915 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/another_armof.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.