Обучаю писать тексты для продаж (соцсети), привлекать клиентов через блог.
Курсы, консультации, книги ▶️ https://sila-slova.info/links
Написать мне в личку ▶️ @kakvoto_takova
-----------
Канал в реестре РКН: https://clck.ru/3GFATM
Created
Between 1 February 2017 and 31 March 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,449–8,468 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 04:27
8,451
-4
12 Aug 2026, 16:08
8,455
-7
9 Aug 2026, 11:05
8,462
-4
6 Aug 2026, 03:02
8,466
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:46
8,466
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.14%
avg views ÷ 8,451 subscribers
Avg views / post
519
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
25 (11 June 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
5,193
Reactions total
234
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 04:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
409
Videos
85
Links
382
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 23s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
561 reactions across 21 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
222
39.6%
👍
155
27.6%
🔥
139
24.8%
💯
21
3.74%
🤣
14
2.50%
🦄
5
0.891%
😱
3
0.535%
😈
2
0.357%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 578reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 25 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @annashust. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
— Мой ребенок уже две недели пытается научиться читать, но у него не получается. Короче, бросаем это дело…
Было бы смешно, если бы родители так рассуждали, правда? Читать, писать, учиться новому, а также чистить зубы, готовить себе еду, следить за своим здоровьем и безопасностью— база, которую нужно освоить, чтобы нормально жить. И иногда требуются годы (!), чтобы научить детей некоторым из этих навыков. Но мы делае…
💥 Контент-план для экспертов на ближайшие месяцы!
👆Я составила его для тех экспертов и специалистов, кто в очередной раз бросил блог, но хочет вернуться. И для тех, у кого закончились свежие идеи.
Как использовать этот документ:
💡 Можно писать эти тексты один за одним, как они перечислены в файле. Последовательность публикаций уже выстроена так, что все будет уместно, логично, посты не будут друг другу противоречи…
⁉️ Почему одни люди ведут блог 10 лет, а другие бросают через месяц? Есть одна закономерность
Когда кто-то говорит, что ему не хватает силы воли вести блог регулярно, это почти всегда означает, что дело не именно в силе воли. Люди бросают тогда, когда каждый пост дается с напрягом. Когда блог становится еще одной работой, только бессмысленной и беспощадной. И когда даже не просто пост, а идея, о чем написать, требуе…
🙈 У маркетплейса Wildberries уничтожены уже почти два десятка складов. Десятки тысяч селлеров не понимают, что им дальше делать и как спасти свой бизнес. Маркетплейсы за последние годы незаметно сделали как будто ненужными навыки сбора своей базы клиентов и продвижения своего товара в соцсетях. Это плохая новость.
Хорошая: вы все еще можете и собирать базу заказчиков, и влиять на свои продажи, потому что потенциальн…
⁉️ Почему не работают кейсы, если все вокруг говорят, что они — лучшие инструменты продаж?
С таким вопросом недавно ко мне на консультацию приходил владелец небольшого бизнеса. Начали смотреть. Бизнес существует уже семь лет, много проектов реализовали, клиентам действительно помогают. То есть проблема точно не в том, что компании нечего показать.
Смотрю кейсы, в них все выглядит вроде бы тоже логично: «Клиент обра…
🤩 Лучший контент для блога вашей компании уже существует. Ищите его в переписках ваших менеджеров
И нет, я не имею в виду, что они косячат и надо делать из этого мемы. Это, конечно, тоже может возыметь эффект, но вряд ли такой, который вам нужен.
Недавно мы работали с одним заказчиком (его компания продает услуги B2B), и я показала ему, как превращать общение с клиентами в контент для блога. Переписки, звонки, возр…
🔥 КАК ПОЛУЧАТЬ СОДЕРЖАТЕЛЬНЫЕ И ЯРКИЕ ОТЗЫВЫ ОТ КЛИЕНТОВ
Ведь хороший отзыв — это не просто фидбэк с благодарностью, это одновременно и материал для более глубокого понимания клиентов, и даже ваш будущий контент! Клиент может рассказать вам в отзыве все то, что позволит вам потом делать классные, живые и продающие тексты.
Я создала маленький видеоурок, благодаря которому легче разобраться, как получать от клиентов …
🙈 Платно или бесплатно? Самому или со специалистом? Мои критерии просты
— Обожаю работать со специалистами, а не самой ковыряться! — написала мне недавно клиентка, которой я делала аудит блога. И я очень хорошо понимаю, о чем она, тоже считаю, что это выгодно — получать опыт профессионалов в обмен на деньги и экономию своего времени. Но вот какая тут у меня грань.
👉 Люблю доходить до сути сама в разных вопросах и р…
😵 Репетитор выложила радостный пост, написанный ИИ, и собрала кучу насмешек
Повод для поста изначально был действительно крутой — очередной кейс ученицы этого преподавателя, которая сдала ЕГЭ по литературе на 100 баллов. Но наполнение поста было шаблонным, нейросетевым. Читатели это сразу распознали и посыпались многочисленные комментарии:
— А вы ученицу тоже учили писать через ИИ, как этот пост?
— Репетитор по ли…
📣 Как анализировать контент в блоге? Что делать с этой информацией потом? Как эти цифры дальше использовать, чтобы лучше продавать, вовлекать, делать вирусные посты?
👆Об этом рассказала в новом видеоуроке, который вышел в моем клубе авторов. Если вам такое надо — присоединяйтесь: https://vk.com/donut/annashustpage (все материалы выложены в ВК).
Но даже если вам это пока не актуально, все равно посмотрите хотя бы фр…
❤6👍4🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @annashust. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 398,909 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анна Шуст, тексты для продаж” (@annashust), 8,451 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annashust.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.