Channel
@annaburlachenko
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001774279891 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @annaburlachenko |
| Description | Привет, я Анна Бурлаченко 𓅪 @AnnaBurlachenkoLive Здесь то, что нравится мне. Если и вам — отлично! Моя графика, акварель и моё видение❗️Может не зайти — это норм 𓃰 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/annaburlachenko |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 30 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 30 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 24 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
18 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2026 to 27 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всему своё время. Особенно в ретроградный Меркурий :)) Этот канал я закрываю. Публикаций больше не будет, чат отключён, а сам канал исчезнет весной‑летом. Решение созрело именно сейчас — в дни, когда астрологи «советуют» в ретроградный Меркурий завершать старое и не начинать нового. Одна из причины — технические блокировки, замедления, боты вместо людей — воздуха становится всё меньше и меньше. Но я остаюсь в боле…
Signed Анна Бурлаченко
Иногда уборка двора от снега даёт идеи для креатива. Этот шедевр от моего папы :))
❤4
Signed Анна Бурлаченко
Подсела на создание стикеров с помощью клейкой ленты. Рисую в блокноте карандашом или ручкой, вырезаю, заклеиваю скотчем — и готов мой стикер. А если добавить вырезки из журналов со шрифтами, получается отличная основа для коллажей. На фото два вида ленты. Оба хороши, просто для разного настроения. Глянцевая дружит с любой бумагой, клейкий слой мощный, снимает хорошо краску. Стикеры яркие, с легким блеском — идеал…
❤3
Signed Анна Бурлаченко
Поменяла кольцевой механизм в черной кожаной обложке. Теперь абсолютно чёрный блокнот – покет А7! Смотреть: https://dzen.ru/shorts/69907eaf193c9e6c60ca40da
❤3
Signed Анна Бурлаченко
Остался небольшой кусок кожи. Сделала обложку под мои мини-скетчбуки. Как раз размер паспорта 125х85 мм. Резинку подобрала бежевую, спокойный, нейтральный оттенок, но если найду другой подходящий цвет, заменю под настроение :)) Эти кожаные обложки совсем не сложно делать, главное найти приятную кожу. Лучше всего найти кожевенный магазин в городе, пощупать и выбрать как ткань для платья :)) Теперь из этой небесно-…
❤2
Signed Анна Бурлаченко
Мой личный блог на сайте: AnnaBurlachenko.ru/blog [но там без подписки]
Signed Анна Бурлаченко
Я в Pinterest: ru.pinterest.com/annaburlachenko_ru/
Signed Анна Бурлаченко
Я в Дзене: dzen.ru/annaburlachenko
Signed Анна Бурлаченко
Я ВКонтакте: vk.com/annaburlachenko_ru
Signed Анна Бурлаченко
Кружки стоит записывать?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Анна Бурлаченко
Привет! Сегодня видео-бунт против нелогичных решений производителей. У меня был симпатичный акварельный мини-скетчбук, но пользоваться им — сплошное мучение. Почему? Потому что в нем односторонняя акварельная бумага! Да-да, ты рисуешь на одной стороне, переворачиваешь, а там — гладкая поверхность, на котором краска ложится не так. Зачем такой скетчбук вообще нужен? Я не выдержала: раздербанила его! В этом видео я ре…
❤2
Signed Анна Бурлаченко
Video message, posted without a caption
❤1
Signed Анна Бурлаченко
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @annaburlachenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кружки стоит записывать?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2026 to 27 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рисунки в блокнот” (@annaburlachenko), 30 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annaburlachenko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.