Channel
@annaandlight
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
316subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001361113531 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @annaandlight |
| Created | 22 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/annaandlight |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 316 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 317 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 319 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 319 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 21 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
173 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 92 | 53.2% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 9.83% | |
| 🙏 | 16 | 9.25% | |
| custom 5467794973296452899 | 15 | 8.67% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 6.94% | |
| custom 4907034366569349685 | 9 | 5.20% | |
| custom 5267102644886853973 | 8 | 4.62% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.73% | |
| custom 4908970924373443444 | 1 | 0.578% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2026 to 12 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @annaandlight. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 March 2026 to 12 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Друзья, я начала говорить про тему отношений Чтобы не смешивать контент - создала новый телеграм канал) Кому интересно или просто хотите поддержать - подпишитесь 🤍 Добро пожаловать 🤗 https://t.me/annaandright
❤6👏1custom 49070343665693496851
Он виноват/она виновата Давайте признаем тот факт, что система давно прогнила Все построено «для женщин», а не для семьи и уж тем более не для мужчин При разводе: ребенок женщине, половину нажитого - женщине (даже если она не сделала для этого ничего) Потому у женщин сформировалось позиция «ты виноват!» Но факт в том, что в отношениях виноваты ответственны оба. Никогда не бывает так, что один партнёр все по конам …
custom 52671026448868539736❤3👍3🙏1
М?)
❤11🙏4custom 54677949732964528994custom 49070343665693496851
НЕ НУЖНО быть идеальным. Почему все время находится куда ЕЩЕ расти Вы тоже попадали в ловушку маркетологов, когда вам обещают, что точно после этого курса станете ТАКИМ? Я да, да и курсов прошла предостаточно, да вот одно чувство мешало мне забрать всю пользу с курсов, отстать от себя и наконец чувствовать себя ОКЕЙ. Это чувство еще называют перфекционизмом. Вечное стремление к идеалу не работает только потому, что …
❤8🔥4👍2
Скинула подруга, написала «послушай 5 раз» Я честно послушала и у меня навернулись слезы А у вас что? 🌸С тобой вся Вселенная Больше про саморазвитие: #ПроживаяСебя
❤8🔥3👏2
Мини сессия для себя Давно мы с вами не практиковали с метафорами) Вот моя иллюстрация, которая послужит отличной метафорической картой Прежде чем всмотреться, задайте вопрос, который вам сейчас актуален, затем откройте фото и напиши в комментариях, какие ассоциации пришли) если напишите чуть подробнее, чтобы я понимала контекст - задам коучинговые вопросы, чтобы углубить ваши осознания Жду ваши ответы🤍 🌸С тобой …
👍4custom 54677949732964528994❤1🙏1
🌱Веганы развиваются быстрее или медленнее? и почему Смотреть на ютюб: https://youtu.be/rcy92phvjmk 🤩С тобой вся Вселенная Больше про питание тут #веганство
custom 54677949732964528996❤2🔥2custom 49070343665693496851custom 49089709243734434441
Рацион вегана 🌱 Я все забываю делать вам фотки)) Нооо.. расскажу на словах) Король 👑 моего рациона - дуриан Сейчас на бали самый сезон, много спелых плодов, ещё и цены ниже)) Обожаю весну на бали Последние дни мне хочется сыроедить За сегодня съела - эту миску дуриана, авокадо, сырую свеколку, лоток мякоти кокоса 🥥, и литр кокосовой воды, может больше 😁 Вчера было так же литр кокосовой воды, сыроедческая пицца 🍕…
❤11🔥2👍1custom 49070343665693496851custom 54677949732964528991
Любишь что-то? Тебе надоест! И причем тут инстаграм Видео для тех, у кого проблема с ютюб Позже будет и в ВК, пока у меня ВК не стабильно работает)) так что находимся, где получается #проживаясебя
❤7
Почему мы бросаем даже то, что любим. Почему случается пресыщение и теряется интерес к делу. Разобрала в этом виде психологическую причину и рассказала, что с этим можно сделать. Смотреть на ютюб: https://youtu.be/3FtnAvWx-0g?si=NvLzyDsR5tfTwIPc
🙏5❤1
Какая сферу жизни у вас проседает?
The shares total 335%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Друзья, помогите, пожалуйста🙏🏻 Хочу лучше понимать, что вам актуально, про что делать контент и какие вопросы помогать решать вам 🤍 Ответьте на опрос 📋 ниже 👇🏻 Можно выбрать несколько вариантов, но важно выбирать те сферы, которые действительно самые проблемные сейчас
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @annaandlight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какая сферу жизни у вас проседает?
The shares total 335%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Делиться с вами более жизненными моментами?)
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2026 to 12 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,002,086 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“С тобой вся Вселенная | Анна” (@annaandlight), 316 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annaandlight.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.