Я в инсте раздаю советы «вашим» мужьям) Обещала дать документ для скачивания. Он ниже 👇🏼
❤🔥19❤3🔥2

Channel
@anna_bueva
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,457subscribers
+42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001649484579 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anna_bueva |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anna_bueva |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 2,457 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 2,454 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 2,450 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 2,446 | +14 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 2,432 | +10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 2,422 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:40 | 2,416 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 2,415 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 2,415 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 31 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
679 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 396 | 58.3% | |
| 🔥 | 86 | 12.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 77 | 11.3% | |
| 😁 | 41 | 6.04% | |
| 💔 | 31 | 4.57% | |
| 🤝 | 10 | 1.47% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 1.33% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 1.18% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 1.18% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 0.736% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.736% | |
| 💅 | 3 | 0.442% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 679reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я в инсте раздаю советы «вашим» мужьям) Обещала дать документ для скачивания. Он ниже 👇🏼
❤🔥19❤3🔥2
Мы составили его с клодом из книги Евы Родски «Счастливые семьи играют по правилам»
❤🔥43🔥20❤9
Теперь вы готовы узнать: КАК ЖЕ УПРАВЛЯТЬ этими чертовыми эмоциями?! Помимо осознанности, нам важно работать над линзой через которую мы смотрим на мир. Линза - это наши убеждения и верования. Рациональные убеждения - те, что можно реализовать в мире в 100% случаях. Если скинуть чашку со стола, она будет лететь вниз. На нее действует закон притяжения. Убеждение «Если я отпущу чашку, она должна лететь вниз» - будет…
❤36🔥7
Сын вырос из всех кофт за каникулы и закатил скандал. Справедливость в этом мире существует 👌🏻
😁26
Уровень проблем, о которых я мечтаю) Я бы заказала борщ и овощной салат с капустой))
❤8
Проблема белых людей - мы не понимаем, что заказать повару - гуляш - чахохбили? 🤷🏼♀️ Хочется супа и салат. Но какой не понятно) Вы бы что заказали? Помогайте.
😁15❤7
Теперь разберемся, почему на одну и ту же ситуацию можете быть такая разная эмоциональная реакция? Дело в линзе через которую мы смотрим на ситуацию. Линза - это система наших убеждений и верований. Она может быть чистой и ровной, передавать цвета и формы, как в реальной жизни, а может быть искривленной. Давайте на примере. Убеждение: Я считаю, что муж, каждое утро должен приносить мне завтрак в постель, иначе он …
❤27
В этой таблице и в РЭПТ нет деления на правильные и неправильные эмоции). Есть дисфункциональные и функциональные. В данной классификации их относят к дисфункциональным, да. Сразу дам ремарку, возможно есть особенности перевода с английского на русский язык. Поэтому часть эмоций может немного «криво» звучать для нашего «уха». Есть еще один важный критерий дисфункциональной эмоции: они обусловлены ИВ (вы можете уви…
❤7💅3
Получается, что злость и обида - неправильные эмоции? (
Только сразу не пугайтесь огромной таблицы. Она очень крутая, большинство моих клиентов с ней знакомы. Часто к ней обращаемся, потом супер помогает в самостоятельной работе. Она на удивление простая и поможет вам ответить на вопросы: - как понять, что именно дисфункциональные эмоции берут верх? - определить - это дисфункциональная реакция или нет? - в какую сторону двигаться? Краткий гайд по таблице 1 СТОЛБЕЦ Умо…
❤29🔥10❤🔥5👍3
А тревога из разряда «я не могу заснуть в ночь перед операцией, потому что боюсь до чертиков (был неприятный опыт с врачами), боюсь не справиться из-за языкового барьера и много еще по чему» тоже дисфункциональная? Или пока я операцию не отменяю, боюсь, но иду «обнявшись со страхом» она все еще норм?)
Чувства можно «чувствовать» по-разному. Сравните между собой. Тревога «Я надеюсь, что экзамен я сдам, но даже если и нет - что ж, это неприятно конечно, буду разбираться» «У меня нет шанса не сдать экзамен, я просто не переживу этот провал» Грусть «Это очень больно, что я потерял свою любимую собаку. Я понимаю, что мы все смертны, она долго болела, и вместе с тем очень горько» «Это чудовищно! Так быть не должно, по…
❤52❤🔥10🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @anna_bueva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какие чувства НЕ испытывает осознанный человек?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,158,100 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“кем стала, когда выросла” (@anna_bueva), 2,457 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anna_bueva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.