Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ваша Анна Аловацкая

Channel

Ваша Анна Аловацкая

@anna_alovatskaya

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

884subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001426181298
TypeChannel
Username@anna_alovatskaya
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/anna_alovatskaya

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8848948897 August 2026 — 894 subscribers7 August 2026 — 894 subscribers14 August 2026 — 893 subscribers21 August 2026 — 888 subscribers27 August 2026 — 887 subscribers2 September 2026 — 885 subscribers10 September 2026 — 888 subscribers18 September 2026 — 884 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 42 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 883–896 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:38884-4
10 Sept 2026, 23:19888+3
2 Sept 2026, 11:43885-2
27 Aug 2026, 09:43887-1
21 Aug 2026, 09:58888-5
14 Aug 2026, 19:25893-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:16894no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:07894first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 26 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1260.0%
❤‍🔥315.0%
😍210.0%
👍15.00%
🔥15.00%
🙏15.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC28 viewsread 7 August 2026

Про это напишу вам скоро, помню Очень интересная информация кстати, правда

2 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC31 viewsread 7 August 2026

Я вообще хотела советы по цветку спросить! Чего с ним не знаю

14 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC40 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

О ЧЕМ ПОДКАСТ: • Тревога не убирается полностью, и это нормально. Важно не дать ей накрыть себя, особенно когда фоновый уровень тревоги высок у всех вокруг. • С психикой как с болезнью: иногда проходит само, иногда нужен специалист. Обратиться к психологу - не слабость, а разумное решение. • Есть полезная тревога (базовая) и мешающая (дополнительная). Важно отслеживать, что вы можете контролировать, и не пытаться

1

1 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC60 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

О ЧЕМ ПОДКАСТ: • Почему мы горюем не только из-за смерти близких, но и из-за потери отношений, мест, вещей и даже своих несбывшихся ожиданий. • Как понять, что потеря действительно прожита, а не просто «спрятана» внутри. • Личная история о зеркале бабушки, которое случайно было потеряно спустя 11 лет после ее ухода. • Почему одна и та же ситуация может вызывать совершенно разную реакцию в зависимости от нашего эм

2🙏1

24 Jun 2026, 05:45 UTC72 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Желаем доброго утра всем!🫶 Захотелось вам показаться

2

18 Jun 2026, 14:34 UTC93 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну и подытожим, неважно какой подход, главное чтобы вам с психологом было комфортно и вы сами чувствовали, что это вам помогает 🫶 А все остальное нюансы😆картинка это юмор конечно

3

18 Jun 2026, 07:47 UTC81 viewsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

О чем подкаст: • Правда ли, что психолог должен сам пройти через вашу боль, чтобы помочь? Разбираюсь в этом вопросе на реальных примерах. • Рассказываю, где личный опыт специалиста действительно помогает, а где он вообще не имеет решающего значения. • Почему понимания и поддержки мало, если за ними не следуют реальные действия. • Делюсь своими историями из практики и объясняю, что на самом деле делает психолога с

3 Jun 2026, 21:23 UTC105 viewsread 7 August 2026

Хотя похоже на бронхообструкцию всё-таки больше, будем разбираться Не помню когда он так сильно болел прям, ужас

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @anna_alovatskaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ваша Анна Аловацкая” (@anna_alovatskaya), 884 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anna_alovatskaya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.