Channel
@anjambeman
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,885subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001446990375 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anjambeman |
| Created | 13 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anjambeman |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 1,885 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 1,887 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 1,887 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (11 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,808 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Антология ежедневной короткой прозы 1. Евгений Кропивницкий, «Сто советов самому себе» 2. Андрей Платонов, «Маркун» 3. Милорад Павич, “Занавес” 4. Хорхе Луис Борхес, «Сон Кольриджа» 5. Реза Негарестани, «Мертвая невеста» 6. Борис Виан, "Мурашки" 7. Сигизмунд Кржижановский, "Красный снег" 8. Антон Чехов, "Пари" 9. Ольга Комарова, "Савл, Савл..." 10. Георгий Иванов, "Дело Почтамтской улицы" 11. Гертруда Стайн, "Мертва…
в своем втором канале ежедневно и неежедневно выкладываю короткую прозу, не пропустите
книги нужно читать как будто ты сидишь в тюрьме на пожизненном
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
DOCKING PROCEDURE From Playboy’s February 1978 pictorial “Close Encounters of the Fourth Kind,” which imagined space as the next erotic frontier. Photography by Bill Arsenault
Разрыв с почвой 1 Перед сном слушал подкаст, где человек из числа релокантов рассуждает, что эмиграция, на самом деле, — глубокий душевный удар для человека, сравнимый с потерей близкого родственника, потому что это полная перемена образа жизни, теперь все чужое и так далее. 2 Сегодня была небольшая переписка с товарищем, в которой мы обсуждали нашу генеалогию. В общем, обнаружили, что почти все сведения о родствен…
Бенхамин Лабатут, из книги "Когда мы перестали понимать мир?". Фрагмент о жизни математика Александра Гротендика Пять лет он занимался физическим трудом, крупных проектов не брал, жил практически отшельником. Дети не навещали его, любовниц у него не было, он даже с соседями не знался, кроме одной двенадцатилетней девочки, которой помогал с домашними заданиями по арифметике. Когда Гротендик истратил все сбережения, о…
Всегда передергивало, когда слышал от женщин что-то вроде: "Я даже своим тупым женским мозгом поняла...", — или: "Даже женщина с этим справится". Такое показное самоуничижение и собачья жизнь А сейчас попалось у Лабатута: В одном особенно леденящем душу посте описывается женщина, запертая в подвале, куда мочатся прохожие, мужчины. Героиня не просто привыкает к этому, но и нарочно встает именно туда, куда они мочатс…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @anjambeman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 65,747 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“а королëв” (@anjambeman), 1,885 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anjambeman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.