Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Анита печатает…

Channel

Анита печатает…

@anita_prof

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,614subscribers

-112 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001395033776
TypeChannel
Username@anita_prof
DescriptionСайт: https://anitaprof.com/ (стоимость консультаций/онлайн продукты/книги) 📍Miami, Florida
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/anita_prof

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 35% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,61417,79117,702.57 August 2026 — 17,726 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,726 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,725 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,724 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,716 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,704 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,690 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,703 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,699 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,700 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,707 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,703 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,711 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,699 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,703 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,702 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,704 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,712 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,715 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,725 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,724 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,728 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,727 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,728 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,732 subscribers6 September 2026 — 17,736 subscribers9 September 2026 — 17,789 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,790 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,787 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,791 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,790 subscribers29 September 2026 — 17,749 subscribers5 October 2026 — 17,762 subscribers9 October 2026 — 17,730 subscribers13 October 2026 — 17,718 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17,715 subscribers15 October 2026 — 17,713 subscribers16 October 2026 — 17,715 subscribers17 October 2026 — 17,710 subscribers18 October 2026 — 17,704 subscribers19 October 2026 — 17,694 subscribers20 October 2026 — 17,690 subscribers21 October 2026 — 17,684 subscribers23 October 2026 — 17,682 subscribers24 October 2026 — 17,689 subscribers25 October 2026 — 17,690 subscribers26 October 2026 — 17,681 subscribers27 October 2026 — 17,682 subscribers28 October 2026 — 17,675 subscribers29 October 2026 — 17,664 subscribers30 October 2026 — 17,660 subscribers31 October 2026 — 17,656 subscribers1 November 2026 — 17,659 subscribers2 November 2026 — 17,654 subscribers2 November 2026 — 17,641 subscribers5 November 2026 — 17,630 subscribers6 November 2026 — 17,621 subscribers6 November 2026 — 17,614 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 91 days, net -112. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,587–17,818 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 22:0017,614-7
6 Nov 2026, 00:3717,621-9
5 Nov 2026, 03:2017,630-11
2 Nov 2026, 23:4917,641-13
2 Nov 2026, 01:5717,654-5
1 Nov 2026, 03:2917,659+3
31 Oct 2026, 05:5117,656-4
30 Oct 2026, 06:4617,660-4
29 Oct 2026, 05:2917,664-11
28 Oct 2026, 03:0617,675-7
27 Oct 2026, 03:2017,682+1
26 Oct 2026, 05:3817,681-9
25 Oct 2026, 03:2617,690+1
24 Oct 2026, 02:2917,689+7
23 Oct 2026, 00:0717,682-2
21 Oct 2026, 19:4017,684-6
20 Oct 2026, 14:0117,690-4
19 Oct 2026, 14:0017,694-10
18 Oct 2026, 11:4217,704-6
17 Oct 2026, 14:4717,710first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 17,614 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,910
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held30 (28 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total17,184
Reactions total336
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 17:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,850
Videos
≈312
Links
≈282

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
16m 59s
Average length
1m 04s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,785 reactions across 30 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤99455.7%
🔥38521.6%
🙏905.04%
👍864.82%
👏663.70%
❤‍🔥492.75%
😢482.69%
💯382.13%
🥰120.672%
🏆40.224%
💘30.168%
😁30.168%
😱30.168%
🤩30.168%
🤗10.056%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,785 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 30 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anita_prof. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (11.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 13:37 UTC964 views30 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Присвоить достижение - это значит увидеть в нём свой вклад и учитывать этот опыт, когда думаете о себе и своих возможностях. Попробуйте упражнение. Возьмите лист и разделите его на три колонки. 1. Что у меня получилось? Вспомните последние три года. Если хочется, возьмите больший период. Чему вы научились? На что решились? Какую сложную задачу решили? Что раньше казалось трудным, а теперь получается привычно? В…

❤18👍9💯2🔥1

31 Oct 2026, 09:10 UTC≈1,980 views64 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Video

«У него нет такой власти, чтобы испортить мне весь день». Эта идея начинается с простого вопроса: сколько места в нашей жизни занимает чужой неприятный поступок? Например, вы пришли поужинать с близким человеком. Хотели поговорить, отдохнуть, провести время вместе. Официант ответил грубо и теперь весь разговор за столом только о нём. Вы раздражены, вечер, которого вы ждали, проходит в обсуждении человека, ради котор…

❤43🔥12👏6👍3

29 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC≈2,000 views45 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Страх оказаться некомпетентным во многом социальный страх. Нам неприятно не просто чего-то не уметь, а не уметь на глазах у других: ошибиться, выглядеть хуже, медленнее, слабее. Особенно тяжело это переживают дети, склонные к сравнению и перфекционизму. Если рядом кто-то уже делает лучше, ребёнку бывает проще вообще отказаться: «У меня не получится», «Я не хочу», «Мне это неинтересно». Но здесь возникает ловушка: м…

👍19❤18❤‍🔥3👏2🔥2💘1

27 Oct 2026, 22:22 UTC≈1,840 views28 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Приложение, которое помогает создавать и поддерживать ТАКИЕ отношения🤎

❤25🔥2👏1

24 Oct 2026, 11:25 UTC≈2,520 views37 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Близкие иногда замечают в нас то, что мы сами перестали замечать. Они видят, о чём мы говорим с особым интересом, какие решения принимаем и что повторяется в нашем поведении годами. Попробуйте спросить человека, который давно и хорошо вас знает: 1. Что, по-твоему, для меня важнее, чем я сама понимаю? Мы не всегда замечаем собственные приоритеты. Например, говорим, что нам всё равно, а сами раз за разом выбираем одн…

❤17🔥17👏3

22 Oct 2026, 11:24 UTC≈1,920 views23 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Да, мы не можем управлять чувствами партнёра. Но мы отвечаем за то, как с ним разговариваем, слушаем ли его и что делаем, когда ему больно. У каждого есть своя часть ответственности за атмосферу между нами. Иногда хочется сказать «всё будет хорошо», чтобы успокоить близкого. Но мы не всегда знаем, как всё сложится. Зато можем честно сказать то, за что отвечаем: «Я буду рядом». И последнее: любовь, забота, ощущение …

❤17👏2🔥2❤‍🔥1💯1

21 Oct 2026, 12:55 UTC≈1,920 views34 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Игра «К сожалению - к счастью» - это небольшая тренировка гибкости мышления. Мы придумываем, какие варианты остаются, когда что-то пошло не по плану. Ответ может быть практичным, смешным или совершенно неожиданным. Правильного здесь нет. Важный момент: предлагайте игру в спокойное время, на придуманных или незначительных неприятностях. Если ребёнок прямо сейчас плачет из-за отменённой поездки, ему сначала нужно дать…

❤22🔥6🥰3❤‍🔥2💯1

18 Oct 2026, 02:08 UTC≈2,310 views50 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

☺️☺️☺️☺️ 1️⃣ Забавно: в детстве я далеко не всегда хотела ехать на дачу. А сейчас поездки туда - одни из самых счастливых моих воспоминаний. Мы ходили в лес, на речку, собирали грибы, а потом с братом их чистили. Детская рабочая сила 😄 Я часто пишу о маленьких семейных традициях и радостях, которые дети уносят с собой во взрослую жизнь. И каждый раз вспоминаю свое лето, дачу, лес и речку💔 ☺️☺️☺️☺️ 2️⃣ Я удивлена,…

❤32🔥11❤‍🔥6🥰1

1 Sept 2026, 13:51 UTC≈1,100 views24 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026

С ДНЕМ ЗНАНИЙ! Ура! Ну, что… теперь точно у всех начался учебный год! Как вы? Какие ощущения и ожидания?

❤20👍2😁2

31 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC≈1,760 views61 reactionsread 3 September 2026

КАК РАЗГОВАРИВАТЬ С НЕ ОЧЕНЬ АДЕКВАТНЫМИ ЛЮДЬМИ? (Мы и сами такими бываем) ПЕРВОЕ: СНАЧАЛА УСПОКОЙТЕ СЕБЯ Пока вы сами сильно злитесь, пугаетесь или чувствуете, что на вас нападают, гораздо сложнее вести разговор к решению. Можно использовать быстрый способ: — сделайте короткий вдох носом; — сразу добавьте ещё один небольшой вдох; — медленно и полностью выдохните через рот; — повторите несколько раз. А затем спро…

🔥29❤24🙏4👏2💯2

28 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC≈2,240 views46 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Иногда решение внутри нас уже принято, а разум просто подбирает для него убедительные объяснения. Если вы настойчиво ищите причины чего-то не делать, возможно, вы просто боитесь. Тогда, вероятно, стоит попробовать. А если приходится собирать длинный список причин, почему вы обязательно должны что-то сделать, возможно, настоящего желания там нет. Иногда важно перестать искать новые аргументы и честно спросить себя:…

🔥25❤7💯7🙏5👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @anita_prof. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @anita_prof as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
26 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
41 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Позитивное воспитание. Вика Минасян
@positivepsychology1 · 54,845
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
Детский психолог Света Гончарова 🇺🇦🇨🇦
@sve_flymama · 42,660
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
Меседу про детство
@meseduprodetstvo · 80,181
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анита печатает…” (@anita_prof), 17,614 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anita_prof.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.