Channel
@anich_teach
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
307subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003748873823 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anich_teach |
| Description | Физика, математика, астрофизика 🚀 Готовлю к ОГЭ, ЕГЭ и олимпиадам. Объясняю сложное через логику, схемы и инженерное мышление. Разборы задач • мои конспекты • интересные факты Запись на занятия: https://t.me/ohh_a_n_n |
| First recorded | 7 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anich_teach |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 17:22 | 307 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 25 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (25 September 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,570 |
| Reactions total | 152 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
190 reactions across 7 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 98 | 51.6% | |
| 😍 | 16 | 8.42% | |
| custom 5237706686122193411 | 12 | 6.32% | |
| custom 5431888578550456721 | 9 | 4.74% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 4.21% | |
| custom 5431393871332400096 | 7 | 3.68% | |
| 💋 | 7 | 3.68% | |
| 🤗 | 7 | 3.68% | |
| custom 5431430692087029696 | 6 | 3.16% | |
| custom 5336794609592865274 | 5 | 2.63% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 2.11% | |
| custom 5346141721149326767 | 3 | 1.58% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.58% | |
| custom 5233256614672217995 | 1 | 0.526% | |
| custom 5287639705322552912 | 1 | 0.526% | |
| custom 5431584005239629391 | 1 | 0.526% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.526% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.526% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anich_teach. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 September 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🤔Центр масс 🤔 Вчера с ребятами разбирали центр масс — одну из тех тем, которые обязательно стоит понять перед олимпиадами по физике. Делюсь с вами конспектом и наиболее интересными задачами!🌟
❤8🔥3custom 53461417211493267673custom 54318885785504567212🤓1custom 52332566146722179951custom 52876397053225529121custom 54315840052396293911
У тех, кто рано встаёт, подписка на красивейшие рассветы 😶 да и у тех, кто поздно ложится, тоже)
❤14⚡4😍4custom 54313938713324000963custom 52377066861221934112custom 53367946095928652741custom 54318885785504567211
Я верю, что когда-нибудь смогу провести день за книгой или сериалом… а пока посижу за статьёй и проектированием редуктора (не жалуюсь, всё чудесно) 🧓
❤16🤗7💋6custom 52377066861221934113custom 54313938713324000961custom 54318885785504567211
Подборка из моего летнего архива
❤10😍4⚡3custom 52377066861221934112💋1🥰1custom 53367946095928652741custom 54313938713324000961
Photo, posted without a caption
❤16custom 53367946095928652743custom 54314306920870296962custom 52377066861221934111custom 54313938713324000961custom 54318885785504567211
Скоро в школах начинается тригоно- метрический сезон, поэтому я собрала для вас всю необходимую информацию🌟
❤15custom 52377066861221934112custom 54318885785504567212⚡1custom 54314306920870296961
Фотографии, доказывающие, что я живу свою лучшую жизнь🤌
❤19😍8🍓4custom 54314306920870296963custom 52377066861221934112custom 54313938713324000961custom 54318885785504567211
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @anich_teach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anich” (@anich_teach), 307 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anich_teach.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.