حقیقتا متاسفانه 99 درصد دخترا همچین تجربه هایی دارن
custom 601034000954085055217

Channel
@angeltindoll
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,118subscribers
+593 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003866317562 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @angeltindoll |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/angeltindoll |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
@angeltindoll was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 1,118 | +460 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 658 | +123 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 535 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 534 | +8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 526 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 525 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 525 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (30 July 2026 – 14 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,623 |
| Reactions total | 107 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Sept 2026, 01:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
576 reactions across 21 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5452079451737173978 | 165 | 28.6% | |
| custom 5224555547801464499 | 87 | 15.1% | |
| custom 5308018066716651291 | 74 | 12.8% | |
| custom 5224660271989030171 | 55 | 9.55% | |
| custom 5307741767175536086 | 54 | 9.38% | |
| custom 5843925110745993300 | 30 | 5.21% | |
| custom 6010340009540850552 | 30 | 5.21% | |
| custom 5447306665034553166 | 24 | 4.17% | |
| custom 5440518327489305590 | 14 | 2.43% | |
| custom 5451987251674232759 | 12 | 2.08% | |
| custom 5195126702472187790 | 9 | 1.56% | |
| custom 5226754532402307815 | 9 | 1.56% | |
| custom 5307562220362693029 | 7 | 1.22% | |
| custom 6118514181139334938 | 6 | 1.04% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 576 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
حقیقتا متاسفانه 99 درصد دخترا همچین تجربه هایی دارن
custom 601034000954085055217
الهی بگردم
یجوری دارم بالا میارم چون همچنین تجربه ایی مثل این دختر بچه داشتم واقعا حالم بده زندت نمیزارم اران
custom 544730666503455316613custom 60103400095408505523
پستش رو لایک، سیو کپی لینک کنید که بیشتر دیده شه
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP83x9kVB/
ممنونم خوشگله
custom 58439251107459933004
https://t.me/angeltindoll/2120?single سلام عزیزدلم من یه پیچ تیکتاک دارم فالوراش کمن ولی خب هرچند وقت یبار پست میزارم همین الان درمورد این موضوع پست گذاشتم واقعا خوشحال میشم حمایت کنی 😭 آیدیم: that3girlfromearth@ خلاصه بابت اطلاع رسانی درمورد این موضوع خیلیی ممنونیم چون واقعا دختربچه های کوچیک که حتی نمیدونن آزار جنسی چیه نباید همچین حس مزخرفی رو تجربه کنن یا اصلا کسی تجربه بکنه..
custom 58439251107459933007custom 54405183274893055901
برید شکایت سایت رو اوکی کنید
custom 52267545324023078153
بهرحال که فایده نداره
custom 52267545324023078153
نه عسلم نزن
میگم ناز این لینک گپی که گذاشته بیوش چیه بزنم روش؟
زودتر پیگیری میشه
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @angeltindoll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝒜𝓃ℊℯ𝓁 ๑ֹ🪽꫶۫ ” (@angeltindoll), 1,118 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/angeltindoll.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.