Channel
@angeli_i_druzhki
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
243subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003012184574 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @angeli_i_druzhki |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/angeli_i_druzhki |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 22:57 | 243 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 241 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 242 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 242 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
425 reactions across 14 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 117 | 27.5% | |
| 😁 | 73 | 17.2% | |
| 👍 | 56 | 13.2% | |
| 🤡 | 36 | 8.47% | |
| 🥰 | 30 | 7.06% | |
| 🤮 | 28 | 6.59% | |
| 💊 | 25 | 5.88% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 4.00% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 2.82% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 1.41% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 1.18% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 0.941% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 0.941% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 0.706% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.706% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.471% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.235% | |
| 🙉 | 1 | 0.235% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.235% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.235% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 425 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ВНЕЗАПНАЯ СПЛЕТНЯ Нам тут нашушукали пару моментов про день концерта в таверне, когда Анна устроила обоссаное цунами. ПРЕДПОЛОЖИТЕЛЬНО Ендрю звонил Анне и орал чтобы шла РАБОТАТЬ. А она мало того что отказалась, так ещё и бпшницам билет на расклад таро отдала. (от этого ситуация ещё смешнее потому что мы думали что она отдала его рандомной девушке) Блять если звонок этот рил был, то я хуею) Такой он ламповый мишка …
🤣25😁4🍌2
бородатая бабка запретила пересыл из своего уютного раковника интересно почему)
🤣31👏3❤1🗿1
Наш талантливый гангелок поиграл в шарики и заснял как "сорок жоп пустили на колбасу анком". ВЫ НЕ ПРЕДСТАВЛЯЕТЕ кто смог избежать поглощения всеатцом
🤣31👍8🍌1🙉1
забыли вкинуть не оч интересное из переписки Яры с Ендрю, но пусть будет. Потому что мне мерзенько) Нрав как он с детским хвастовством рассказывает что причастен к чему-то или что САМ ВИДЕЛ что-то, например голые фотки Аннушки. Упоминать про то что реальную шизуху наебали на интимки и что это осуждали в бц мы конечно же не будем)
🤮28🤡5
ну-ка у кого пижже фотки неба?
😁29
давно приглянулась оззя, одна из самых ярых гейтуров сасаги. заготелось запостить ее перлы + смешное горение с нихуя. девочка попустись какой мелтдаун с какавьего хламовника? потрогай трагу
💊24🔥6🥱4
арирую пельмень даже шанса не дает ПЕРДЕЖНЫМ КРЫСАМ даж если они не пишут ничего
😁19💔4
я только что подписалась на пельменное бу и вступила в их сят и через секунду была забанннена 🤣 падыхаю 🤣🤣
😁18😭5💊1🤓1
какое же ламповое и доброе сообщество
🥰30❤2
блять даже копать на этого долбаеба ниче не надо сам кринжа навалил
❤13💯12👍1
я зяс сдохну это он все еще про раковальню да
🤡31😁3
самое мерзкое писала доносы)))) самое аморальное оставила без денег человека))))
🤣30❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @angeli_i_druzhki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“пельмена водiчка” (@angeli_i_druzhki), 243 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/angeli_i_druzhki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.