Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Андрей и Панки

@andypunks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,086subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002144821452
TypeChannel
Username@andypunks
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/andypunks

Growth

3,0613,1003,080.56 August 2026 — 3,061 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,063 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,100 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,086 subscribers3,0866 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,055–3,106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 21:153,086-14
9 Aug 2026, 03:533,100+37
6 Aug 2026, 13:423,063+2
6 Aug 2026, 06:043,061first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.27%
avg views ÷ 3,086 subscribers
Avg views / post
255
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (23 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,806
Reactions total220
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 00s
Average length
1m 20s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

329 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14544.1%
🔥8425.5%
❤‍🔥236.99%
🤝185.47%
👍154.56%
💔123.65%
😁123.65%
😢82.43%
👌30.912%
😍30.912%
20.608%
👏10.304%
💘10.304%
😱10.304%
🤮10.304%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 382reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC123 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мы нашли крутой офис! Скоро переезд, фоточки и приглашение на новоселье. И вот еще что: Самое дорогое сегодня - правильные источники информации. Можно работать 10 лет, иметь опыт, команду, процессы - и всё равно потерять деньги потому, что: • опирался на устаревший подход, • не заметил важное изменение в законе, •не увидел риски в каком-то важном решении Предпринимателям, руководителям и экспертам нужны надёжные

🔥52

6 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC171 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мы ищем новый офис Владелец нашего прекрасного, обжитого и уютного офиса решил продать его 6 лет назад. А вчера, таки, продал. Вторую неделю я сижу на авито и циане в надежде найти хоть что-то плюсминус приличное. Изначально мои параметры были такими: ⚪️от 50м2 ⚪️на ВИЗе или Юго-Западе ⚪️симпатичное ⚪️чистое ⚪️с доступом 24/7 95% рынка это просто какой то пиздос: старый линолеум, бежевые стены, меленькое окно, по

11😢8🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC204 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Где щас клиентов берешь?» Да в партнерке и в нетворке, хоспаде. Все остальное мертво так давно, что уже и не вспомню эти времена. Схема простая: 1 — знакомишься, строишь отношения 2 — к тебе приходят с задачей Все, больше ничего не работает в августе 2026. Расходимся. Второй вопрос, который я слышу сразу же после первого: «А где ты берешь новые знакомства?» Да вот в таких папках, как эта, например: https://t.

🔥4👌32😁2

3 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC216 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Про оружие, которое никто не замечает Большинство считает, что если ты делаешь скучную работу, то тебе невозможно быть интересным. Ну вот, например, пришиваешь ты пуговицы с лучше всех в мире с такой дотошностью, что ни один портной не докопается. Да что там портной, любой перфекционист-пуговицефил вопросов не задает и глубоко уважает тебя! И, казалось бы, если ты решил завести блог про свое пуговичное дело, то ко

5🔥3🤮1😁1😱1

29 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTC336 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Почему дизайнеры и менеджеры сегодня никому не нужны? Спойлер: за красивую картинку и приятное общение никто не готов платить деньги. Давайте без воды, вот как есть: деньги стали настолько дорогими и настолько недоступными, что бизнес готов платить только за результат. Причем за быстрый и уверенный результат. Именно поэтому на рынке оказалось огромное количество людей, которые не обладают уникальной экспертизой пр

14❤‍🔥7🔥5

25 Jul 2026, 13:31 UTC271 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кстати, я тут вспомнил о том, что есть запись этой лекции на Медиафоруме «Блогосфера». Поэтому, если хотите послушать о том, как развивать свою креативность и монетизировать этот навык, то вот запись: https://vkvideo.ru/video-107927202_456239174?pl=-107927202_3&t=46m58s

9🔥7❤‍🔥3

25 Jul 2026, 13:11 UTC239 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥4👍4😍2

21 Jul 2026, 17:09 UTC334 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А помните я вам обещал лекцию по основам базового креатива? А я с Урала жеж. У нас тут любое сомнительное обещание проверяется вопросом «Пиздаболам в рот нассым?». Раз обещал — делаю. Поэтому в рамках антифестиваля «УРАЛ — МЫ» в эту субботу, 25 июля, в 12:00 встречаемся у памятника Ельцину у Ельцин Центра. Будем учиться включать мозги на максимум, думать иначе и смотреть на мир под другим углом. А еще гулять, нем

9❤‍🔥5🔥4👏1💔1

20 Jul 2026, 19:10 UTC301 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Выбираем сегодня с сыном киношку на вечер. Наткнулись на фильм «Стрельцов». Посмотрели трейлер. Мелкий берет пульт и ставит оценку 10/10. Спрашиваю: - Почему ты поставил оценку? Мы же не посмотрели фильм - Ну и что? Люди трудились. Мне не жалко Благодарность — настолько же бесплатная, насколько ценная валюта. Спасибо, что напомнил, сын. Андрей и Панки

24💔6🤝5

14 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC369 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Шикарная история от том, как менторинг перерос в партнерство С Ирой я познакомился на дизайн-митапе, который мы с Сашей Устиновым впопыхах делали в октябре прошлого года. Ирка тогда дико зацепила меня своей открытостью, прямотой и диким энтузиазмом и энергией, которые вообще-то присущи двадцатилетним девченкам, а не взрослым тётям с лицом славик-гёрл. Ну кароч, через месяц Ира была моим менти. Проблема была практич

20🔥12❤‍🔥42👍1💘1

13 Jul 2026, 08:54 UTC283 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Про отдых, который всегда не вовремя Если вспомнить меня лет 15 назад, то мне было дико срать на свое состояние. Я летел на работу с температурой, полностью без сил, мне было плевать на себя. Потому что задачи, проекты, команда, ответственность и «ну кто, если не я»? И в целом, мне было ок, потому что в 22 года на перекрестке меня мог сбить груженый щебнем Камаз, я бы просто отряхнулся и пошел бы дальше. Сейчас все

🔥2011👍8

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @andypunks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 123,326 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Андрей и Панки” (@andypunks), 3,086 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andypunks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.