Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Андрей Ломакин | Нескучная математика

Channel

Андрей Ломакин | Нескучная математика

@andreylomakin_math

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

4,960subscribers

+392 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002075332141
TypeChannel
Username@andreylomakin_math
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/andreylomakin_math

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,5684,9604,7646 August 2026 — 4,568 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,568 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,570 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,579 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,580 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,588 subscribers30 September 2026 — 4,960 subscribers6 August 202630 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 55 days, net +392. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,509–5,019 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Sept 2026, 13:414,960+372
16 Aug 2026, 15:574,588+8
13 Aug 2026, 04:034,580+1
9 Aug 2026, 22:214,579+9
7 Aug 2026, 04:304,570+2
6 Aug 2026, 18:454,568no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:354,568first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

693 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤33047.6%
🔥24935.9%
👍507.22%
💯466.64%
🙏182.60%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 693 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @andreylomakin_math. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC350 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Какой формат занятий выбрали бы вы?

  1. 1 раз в неделю72%
  2. 2 раза в неделю28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC513 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В какую школу отдать ребенка? Многие этим вопросом не задаются и идут в ту, что ближе к дому, а очень зря. Потому, что, как показывает практика, именно период школьного обучения больше всего формирует ребенка. И от того, в какой среде он будет учиться, во многом зависит все его будущее. Собрал для вас список из 10 лучших школ нашей страны, выпускники которых добивались и добиваются выдающихся результатов в абсолютн…

❤16🔥9🙏3

7 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC500 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Думаю главный индикатор крутых уроков — это когда и, дети и преподаватель выходят после них с мотивацией заниматься еще больше!)

❤31

7 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC489 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤25

5 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC703 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Активно готовимся к учебному году, в частности, делаем новые программы по возрастам и пересобираем группы. И я решил уже с августа все пробные уроки также проводить в новом формате! До конца месяца каждую неделю у нас будет новое расследование в "Агентстве Х", которое занимается нераскрытыми преступлениями. А детям нужно будет не просто найти ответ на свое задание, а суметь его объяснить так, чтобы другие поверили🕵…

❤14🔥7👍6

4 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈1,020 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Самое полезное исследование последних 30 лет🤯 Просто не могу не поделиться с вами. Есть мнение, что дети, которых хвалят и поддерживают на всех этапах их взросления, вырастают более открытыми и уверенными в себе. Они не боятся пробовать что-то новое, реже теряются, когда сталкиваются с проблемами и т.д. Этого мнения придерживаюсь и я. Но есть огромное НО!!! Важно понимать, за что именно мы ребенка хвалим, и к чем…

❤25🔥19💯8

3 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC741 views103 reactionsread 12 August 2026

По понедельникам всегда записываю голосовые родителям наших учеников, и сегодня поймал себя на мысли, что в 9 из 10 случаях, неуверенность ребёнка связана с тем что он не до конца понимает «что откуда берется». Например, решает он какой-нибудь тест, видит перед собой несколько ответов и не может выбрать один. Почему? Потому, что не может построить в голове цепочку рассуждений, чтобы автоматически отсеить неправильн…

🔥85❤12💯5👍1

2 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC840 views68 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Это мой любимый сборник задач, с помощью которого, кажется, можно отрабатывать почти всю начальную школу (имею ввиду только математику) Меня в последнее время часто просят отправить задачи для тренировки внимания и понимания условий. Проблемы распространенные, поэтому оставлю здесь именно те разделы, которые помогут с этим разобраться. Если у ребенка проблема с вниманием: «Я больше тебя» стр. 18 «Последовательности…

🔥37❤22🙏9

29 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,130 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как понять, что вам нужен репетитор? Наблюдаю интересную тенденцию: с каждым годом репетиторов по математике начинают искать все раньше. Сначала обращались за подготовкой к ОГЭ и ЕГЭ (вроде объективная причина). Потом порог снизился, и репетиторов стали искать в 7 классе, когда алгебра и геометрия только появляются, чтобы не упустить ничего в самом начале и не иметь серьезных проблем в будущем. Теперь же, я все чаще…

👍21❤13🔥13

28 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,040 views74 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Хочу четно рассказать, что сейчас происходит у нас внутри школы. За последнее время я остро ощутил, что всё мое внимание должно быть направлено не на преподавание само по себе, а на то, чтобы каждая тема модуля, каждое задание на отдельном уроке, каждый разговор ученика с преподавателем — всё образовывало единую систему. И самое главное, чтобы результаты наших занятий у детей были не просто заметны, а очевидны. Это…

❤39🔥22👍13

27 Jul 2026, 06:57 UTC≈1,180 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Почему ребёнку не дается математика? Чем больше занимаюсь с ребятами, тем больше убеждаюсь, что у каждого есть какой-то свой уникальный способ думать. Чуть углубился в эту тему и нашел вот такие интересные исследования. В 1983 году гарвардский психолог Говард Гарднер опубликовал работу, которая перевернула представление об интеллекте. Он показал, что существует минимум восемь разных типов мышления🧠. Причем у каждо…

❤34💯5🙏4

24 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,160 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В школах вводят оценки за поведение — к чему это ведет? Думаю все подобную информацию нужно оценивать критически и смотреть чуть дальше чем предлагают те же новостные порталы. И, честно, я вижу здесь больше минусов и ограничений, нежели преимуществ. Во-первых, оценка за поведение будет очень сильно зависеть от учителя и от его «адекватности». Если по школьным предметам есть конкретные критерии оценки, и в целом та …

💯23❤11🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @andreylomakin_math. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTCAnonymous Poll78 voters

Какой формат занятий выбрали бы вы?

  1. 1 раз в неделю72%
  2. 2 раза в неделю28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Андрей Ломакин | Нескучная математика” (@andreylomakin_math), 4,960 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andreylomakin_math.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.