Фэнтези хуёво получилось Надеюсь прогнозы прокнут
❤🔥2

Channel
@andrewdark
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
125subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001552986169 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @andrewdark |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/andrewdark |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 22:20 | 125 | +2 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 123 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 124 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 125 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 126 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:10 | 126 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 2 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
127 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 59 | 46.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 22 | 17.3% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 6.30% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 5.51% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 4.72% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 3.94% | |
| 🗿 | 4 | 3.15% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 2.36% | |
| 😈 | 3 | 2.36% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.36% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 1.57% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.57% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.787% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.787% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.787% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Фэнтези хуёво получилось Надеюсь прогнозы прокнут
❤🔥2
👌 :ok_hand: Итоги года уже доступны в Discord, но ток с ПК
❤🔥3
Всё хорошо, я делаю прогнозы для крутых, в следующий раз в 1500 зайду, опыт усвоен
🌚3
Делал на два аккаунта Получилось на одном (Не моём)
❤🔥2
привет! как дела? пока!
⚡2
По традиции в честь ДР стримчанский https://www.twitch.tv/andrewdark_
❤🔥3❤1🔥1
ладно гайс, я выгорел, может в будущем что-то и будет но точне не сейчас всем 100 людям спасибо что читали этот щитпостинг, на данный момент просто всем желаю всего хорошего
❤10💔5🕊4
всем привет, постов не было, и тут вот короче, сейчас работа у меня в ИРЛ опять закончилась, по этому буду мб делать эксперементы с твичём и пытаться его поднять чисто при помощи советов AI. отчёты буду либо сюда кидать либо в @andrewdarkstream
❤2
я не то чтобы выёбываюсь, но немного выёбываюсь
😈3
такое, чистое напоминание что 26-го мая через год 6-я гта выйдет вот вам новый трейлер на оценочку, что думаете?
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7🗿4🍓1
Всем привет! Почти месяц не курю и могу сказать что пока что ничего такого не замечаю за собой, но чем чаще думаю о курении, тем сильнее тянет. Благо есть таблетки которые отлично помогают пережить этот момент, буду держать в курсе Сейчас как в старые добрые запускаю стрим по гачи играм, а там посмотрим
❤9⚡3❤🔥3🍓1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @andrewdark. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Deep Dark Fantasy” (@andrewdark), 125 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andrewdark.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.