Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🌴 Andreas V 🌴

Channel

🌴 Andreas V 🌴

@andrerasv

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,697subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001423772272
TypeChannel
Username@andrerasv
Created11 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/andrerasv

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,6975,7365,716.56 August 2026 — 5,717 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,717 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,712 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,714 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,721 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,728 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,726 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,724 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,723 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,725 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,718 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,724 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,722 subscribers17 September 2026 — 5,732 subscribers25 September 2026 — 5,736 subscribers4 October 2026 — 5,733 subscribers11 October 2026 — 5,731 subscribers14 October 2026 — 5,727 subscribers20 October 2026 — 5,726 subscribers23 October 2026 — 5,722 subscribers26 October 2026 — 5,716 subscribers29 October 2026 — 5,713 subscribers31 October 2026 — 5,710 subscribers4 November 2026 — 5,711 subscribers7 November 2026 — 5,702 subscribers10 November 2026 — 5,697 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 96 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,691–5,742 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 08:075,697-5
7 Nov 2026, 06:495,702-9
4 Nov 2026, 01:205,711+1
31 Oct 2026, 23:305,710-3
29 Oct 2026, 06:475,713-3
26 Oct 2026, 10:315,716-6
23 Oct 2026, 15:165,722-4
20 Oct 2026, 10:155,726-1
14 Oct 2026, 10:565,727-4
11 Oct 2026, 05:175,731-2
4 Oct 2026, 19:365,733-3
25 Sept 2026, 04:005,736+4
17 Sept 2026, 02:425,732+10
13 Sept 2026, 05:365,722-2
9 Sept 2026, 15:405,724+6
4 Sept 2026, 15:415,718-7
31 Aug 2026, 17:485,725+2
25 Aug 2026, 06:165,723-1
22 Aug 2026, 14:375,724-2
19 Aug 2026, 15:435,726first reading

Engagement

61 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.1%
avg views ÷ 5,697 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,430
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 61 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held61 (1 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total68,532
Reactions total418
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 20:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
46m 50s
Average length
15m 37s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

958 reactions across 58 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍49451.6%
❤26027.1%
🔥676.99%
💯333.44%
👎303.13%
🤗303.13%
😎232.40%
🤔121.25%
🎉90.939%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 958 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (10.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 16:33 UTC706 views15 reactionsread 4 November 2026

⬆️ Der Link Live ab 19:30 🍿😎

👍15

4 Nov 2026, 16:32 UTC267 views21 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @gemeinsamaufdenpunkt

!!!Midterms in den USA!!! 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🔥Live ab ca. 19:30 heute hier🔥 😎Wir betrachten die Wahl in den USA, sowie die aktuellen Ereignisse dazu. Kurz gesagt: 🥳Der eine bringt sein Land auf Vordermann……..und geht gegen Betrug vor…..🥳 🙈Die anderen wollen lieber das Klima retten…..🙈 Multipolarität oder Hegemonie? 🍀Veikko, Friedemann „Mäckle“ und der Wahrheitsjäger geben alles, um die Punkte zu verbinden und in dem Wahn…

👍16❤5

4 Nov 2026, 14:09 UTC396 views38 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @gemeinsamaufdenpunktPhoto

Na was ist denn in den USA los?…… relativ wenig ist, wie es scheint. Mehr dazu heute Abend ☀️☀️…… 👉 Link dazu folgt natürlich noch 👉 bis dahin allen einen tollen Tag 👉 wir freuen uns auf die 4er Runde und auf euch 🍀bis später🍀 📱 Veikko - Telegram Mäckle - Friedemann 📱Mäckle macht gute Laune Wahrheitsjäger 📱Wahrheitsjäger Gemeinsam auf den Punkt gebracht 📱 Telegram | 📹 youtube

❤32👍4😎2

4 Nov 2026, 09:37 UTC≈1,160 views23 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Republikaner-Niederlage: Elon Musks „Wahleinmischungs-Weltraum-Laser“ haben versagt Der Tech-Milliardär Elon Musk hatte die Republikaner mit rund einer halben Milliarde US-Dollar für die US-Kongresswahlen unterstützt. Er nimmt es mit Humor.😁 https://www.diepresse.com/41417848/republikaner-niederlage-elon-musks-wahleinmischungs-weltraum-laser

❤21👍2

4 Nov 2026, 08:07 UTC≈16,900 views6 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Analysten schätzen den Tunnel zwischen Russland und den USA auf 205 Milliarden Dollar Experten haben die Kosten und die Bauzeit des Beringstraßentunnels berechnet. Wie, wer und wann einen Tunnel in Rekordzeit bauen könnte und warum die Diomedes-Inseln zum „einzigartigen Vorteil“ der Route geworden sind – lesen Sie diesen Artikel von RBC. https://www.rbc.ru/business/03/11/2026/6ae0dcc1ecc4a5e3283d63f7?utm_source=rbc…

😎5👍1

4 Nov 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,100 views35 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Das ist auch wie hier, überall müssen jetzt irgendwelche Pfeifen eingesetzt werden, damit jeder sieht, dass die es nicht bringen. Ist mal langsam gut 🤪 🍿😎

👍32🤔2💯1

4 Nov 2026, 07:56 UTC≈1,150 views12 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Zum ersten Mal seit 30 Jahren wird ein Demokrat Gouverneur einer republikanischen Hochburg Dies ist das erste Mal seit 1995, dass die Demokraten in diesem traditionell republikanischen Staat die Kontrolle über das Gouverneursamt von den Republikanern zurückerobert haben. „Wenn der texanische Gouverneur Greg Abbott sich in den letzten sechs Monaten seiner politischen Karriere nicht in einen RINO (Republikaner nur de…

👍12

3 Nov 2026, 17:11 UTC503 views17 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @DDDDoffiziellPhoto

Q-Post 2405 vom 4. November 2018: WIR WERDEN DIE WAHL SCHÜTZEN. ALLE MÜSSEN MITANPACKEN. Q https://www.qanon.pub/#2405 Übersetzung: Dirk Dietrich https://t.me/DDDDoffiziell 🔥

👍17

3 Nov 2026, 17:11 UTC525 views24 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @Tom_Texas

Der Neunte US-Berufungsgerichtshof hat den Versuch der Demokraten, Trumps Vorgehen gegen die Integrität der Wahlen zu blockieren, jäh gestoppt! Ein Gremium des Neunten US-Berufungsgerichtshofs hat dem Eilantrag der Trump-Regierung stattgegeben und damit eine einstweilige Verfügung eines unteren Gerichts aufgehoben, die das Justizministerium und das Heimatschutzministerium daran hindern sollte, die Bundesstaaten unte…

👍19❤5

3 Nov 2026, 17:07 UTC≈17,300 views15 reactionsread 4 November 2026

DER FALSCHE ALASKANISCHE KANDIDAT DANIAL J. SULLIVAN JR. IST VERMISST! ER IST KOMPLETT VERSCHWUNDEN, WEG! NIEMAND HAT ES GESCHAFFT, IHN ZU FINDEN. MÖGLICHERWEISE WURDE ER VON DEN KORRUPTEN DEMOKRATISCHEN ANWÄLTEN "ENTFÜHRT"??? SIE HABEN GROSSE ANGST, FÜR WAHLBETRUG ANGEKLAGT ZU WERDEN!!! PRÄSIDENT DJT

👍15

3 Nov 2026, 17:07 UTC980 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @real_donaldjtrump

FAKE ALASKA CANDIDATE DANIAL J. SULLIVAN, JR., IS MISSING IN ACTION! HE HAS TOTALLY DISAPPEARED, GONE! NOBODY HAS BEEN ABLE TO FIND HIM. MAYBE HE HAS BEEN “KIDNAPPED” BY THE CORRUPT DUMOCRAT LAWYERS??? THEY ARE SCARED STIFF OF BEING PROSECUTED FOR ELECTION FRAUD!!! PRESIDENT DJT

👍3

3 Nov 2026, 17:07 UTC≈1,160 views12 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Abdul El-Sayed hasst Juden und Schwarze. Schade sollten Sie sich nicht fühlen, denn er hasst auch Weiße. Nur Dummköpfe würden für ihn bei der Wahl zum US-Senat in Michigan stimmen! Er wird Sie, zu 100%, ruinieren! WÄHLEN SIE MIKE ROGERS. Präsident DJT.

👍12

Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @andrerasv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Digitaler Chronist
@DigitalChronist · 29,121
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
HaJos Gedanken
@hajosgedanken_offiziell · 31,098
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 5 September 2026
Dirk Dietrich
@DDDDoffiziell · 55,848
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026
SC-360* Media
@SC360Media · 34,374
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 September 2026
fuf media - Freiheit denken
@fufmedia · 54,560
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 August 2026
🏛TEMPEL DER AHNEN🏛
@tempelderahnen · 21,502
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 September 2026
Veikko aka Son Go Q
@BitchBotBoiiLive · 71,561
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026
Qlobal-Change 🫂
@QlobalChange · 91,935
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
Catherines Blick
@t5mtxr8b · 23,141
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌴 Andreas V 🌴” (@andrerasv), 5,697 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andrerasv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.