Channel
@andrediasPhd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,870subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001267161135 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @andrediasPhd |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/andrediasPhd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 1,870 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 1,872 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 1,874 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 1,874 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (21 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,622 |
| Reactions total | 118 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
118 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 51 | 43.2% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 17.8% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 16.9% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 9.32% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 8.47% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.847% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Aí está. A urgência falsa, as ameaças e coação para injetar em 2021 eram apenas para criar o precedente. O negócio de salvação duas vezes ao ano, sem custos de testar, sem custos de garantir nada. Basta mudar uma linha de código no computador e meter no mercado. Os velhotes pagam. A partir de agora só toma a "vacina" da gripe quem for idiota, como só injetou em 2021 quem era burro.
A administração do Trumpetas usa personagens, videos e sons com direitos de autor para promover os seus crimes. Sem autorização e sem pagar. Portanto são um estado pária a roubar e violar direitos. A administração do país cujo unico bem comercial praticamente restante é precisamente o direito de autor e patentes. Portanto, perdem toda a legitimidade para impor a sua extorsão, muito menos para criticar a China de lhe …
😁2
O Trumpetas pedofilo senil já anunciou esta semana um acordo com o Irão? Anunciou o fim do Irão? Ou a abertura de Ormuz? Não? Deve estar sem ideias para roubar na bolsa.
😁7
Cagadeiras! O nazi vai montar fábricas de cagadeiras, mictórios e bidés na Lua. Já que há idiotas para acreditar em tudo, pelo menos podia meter lhes diretamente na boca. Yap, um génio estável e credível! Nunca duvidem. Não tem nada a ver com drogas e fraude! Nada!
😁2👎1
Dez anos depois... O nazi bem tentou destruir todos mecanismos de investigação. É óbvio desde 2014 o crime destas suspensões assassinas. Sabe se o número de mortos e carroças em sucatas com prova irrefutável de suspensões partidas em andamento. Até em Portugal há relatos de acidentes cristalinos. Este esterco ainda aí nas estradas pronto a assassinar de frente um inocente noutro carro! Tudo para o pedo nazi salvar o …
Photo, posted without a caption
😁5
Nada como promover a salvação do planeta queimando milhões de toneladas de combustível, encher a atmosfera de satélites descartáveis e não satisfeito, cagar o oceano com falos! Que uso ético e inovador dos subsídios verdes! Vamos para a Lua e Marte, diz o nazi! Mas antes é só cagar aqui qb
🔥1
Vale tudo para vender medo. Agora são secas relâmpago! Secas que alastram. Vamos ter cheias explosivas. Ventos atómicos. Neve torrente! Vale tudo!
😁6
Número de acidentes da bosta "full self driving"
😁5
Obviamente a Tesla fraude não publica nada sobre os acidentes do seu "full self driving". Apaga os dados todos para não "sofrer perdas financeiras". Mais de 1000 acidentes das carroças fraude autónomas num ano nos EUA! Mil! Num sistema cujo nazi vigarista assegura ser "melhor que humano". Mil acidentes com 1 milhão de carroças destas é OBVIAMENTE um homicídio ao virar da esquina! Obviamente muito mais perigoso que co…
😁3
Apagar fogo com fogo. A essência de conhecer o fogo: retirar o combustível de forma controlada a umas centenas de metros antes da frente de fogo. Perceber que só podemos controlar na verdade um dos elementos do triângulo de fogo, o combustível, e usar o fogo como a ferramenta essencial do homem há milénios. Imagens de Espanha. Em Portugal este gesto está criminalizado. Há meia dúzia de pinga lume, a ferramenta, no pa…
👏5
"Sucede que num fim de semana que não estive" Foi o vento que ladeou o tanque de terra e meteu o sistema de filtragem e as espreguiçadeiras! Alguém tem aí um atrelado com químicos para droga para eu guardar a custo zero? Até vos poupo 150 000 euros!
😁4❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @andrediasPhd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 285,347 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“#André Dias” (@andrediasPhd), 1,870 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andrediasPhd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.