5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,365–4,375 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 19:27
4,366
-4
12 Aug 2026, 19:33
4,370
-2
6 Aug 2026, 17:30
4,372
-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:04
4,374
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:30
4,374
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.1%
avg views ÷ 4,366 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,620
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held
7 (31 May 2026 – 29 July 2026)
Views total
9,710
Reactions total
619
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
769 reactions across 7 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
430
55.9%
❤🔥
124
16.1%
🔥
76
9.88%
👏
23
2.99%
👍
22
2.86%
😭
20
2.60%
🤩
20
2.60%
😁
10
1.30%
💯
9
1.17%
😎
7
0.91%
🗿
6
0.78%
🤝
6
0.78%
💘
4
0.52%
🤔
4
0.52%
🥴
4
0.52%
😍
3
0.39%
🌚
1
0.13%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 769reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Багато думаю про цей шот зі Spider-Man: Brand New Day. Мабуть, політ на павутині не виглядав настільки класно з часів The Amazing Spider-Man 2, у якому було багато винахідливості та справжнього фізичного відчуття польоту.
У новому шоті стільки ваги й інерції. І те, як правильно тремтить камера та як вона розташована в кадрі, ніби це одночасно POV і "камера за плечем"... ухх! Навіть гнучкість самої павутини під порив…
Ніколи не робив репостів у цьому каналі, але чому б не підтримати ініціативу. Сподіваюся, що серед моїх підписників знайдуться шанувальники фільмів жахів і їм буде цікаво взяти участь у конкурсі. Все ж таки жанрове кіно саме по собі не з’явиться 😌
До речі Backrooms >>> Obsession 😏
ЖАХЛИВИЙ КОНКУРС 💀
Ууууу!! Найбільший пітчинг ШОЯКШО підʼїхав. Шукаємо авторів, які пишуть в жанрі жахи (горрор) – ловлять адреналін від емоції страху, люблять пранкувать близьких, розказувати страшні історії на ніч... ну ви поняли)
На хвилі нещодавнього успіху Backrooms та Obsession, які виросли з маленької ідеї на YouTube, ми ще раз подумали про жанр жахів в Україні, а точніше... його відсутність. При цьому інозе…
(2000) Escaflowne (エスカフローネ)
dir. Kazuki Akane
Для мене досі дивно, що сьогодні такі анімаційні фільми — це вже втрачене мистецтво. І я думаю, що справа не лише в неймовірних аналогових якостях целулоїдної анімації, а ще й у тому, що аніме більше так не звучить, не рухається і не відчувається.
Повнометражний Escaflowne — це альтернативне трактування більш романтичного оригінального серіалу, в якому учениця старшої ш…
❤91❤🔥42🤩7👍4🔥4😍2
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @andactionnotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“...and Action!” (@andactionnotes), 4,366 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andactionnotes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
