Channel
@ancharts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
4,845subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001276387970 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ancharts |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ancharts |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 4,845 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:09 | 4,843 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 4,846 | -9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 4,855 | +20 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 4,835 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 4,829 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 4,828 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 4,828 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (21 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 35,090 |
| Reactions total | 908 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
957 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5429606679605973740 | 716 | 74.8% | |
| custom 5431903610935994672 | 154 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5431898422615498998 | 87 | 9.09% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 957reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ancharts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
короче, значит, записывала видео 40 минут в 4К с микрофоном, переодевалась, чтобы снять второго персонажа, 2 часа монтировала, чтобы выровнять аудиодорожки и сделать субтитры.. тикток говорит, что видео disqualified from creator rewards program как low quality и если у меня будет еще 4 таких нарушения, то меня забанят в этой программе 🫠 а я как бы ну.. не очень понимаю, куда более high quality..
custom 542960667960597374060
📌можно ли в 2026 сделать хороший дубляж видео на английском с помощью AI? если вам тоже было интересно, не благодарите. я протестировала функции дубляжа в ElevenLabs, который все рекламируют, и в CapCut, потому что он обычно есть у всех. 📌ElevenLabs • минимальная подписка стоит $6, а дает ~40 минут перевода, что приятно • в целом качество дубляжа неплохое, можно регулировать, насколько native ты хочешь звучать, я…
custom 542960667960597374029
Posted without readable text
custom 543190361093599467212custom 54318984226154989981
📌выходные на майорке недавно поняла, почему, когда я жила в России, мне казалось, что все люди, живущие в Европе, очень богаты ↔️чтобы столько же путешествовать и поддерживать такой уровень жизни, какой я веду, живя в Лондоне, в России мне пришлось бы зарабатывать в разы больше (не факт, что это в принципе было бы возможно в найме) билеты туда-обратно (я же недавно ездила) через Турцию — от 500 фунтов. это буквал…
custom 5429606679605973740101custom 54319036109359946728
Но ведь в Европе вам будут улыбаться , и говорить лесности, а при этом считать вас тупым или в целом плохо относиться . Что лучше - правда и токсичность , честный фидбек или всегда якобы лесности и какой ты молодец. Что лучше для роста ? Наверное все таки честный Фидбек интересное. обсудим? начну с того, что «ты тупая» — это не фидбек. вернее, формально, конечно, фидбек, но фидбек не конструктивный, а скорее деструк…
custom 543190361093599467273custom 542960667960597374049custom 543189842261549899810
жить в европе и сменить цвет волос == услышать хоть какую-то реакцию на смену имиджа только от 4 людей в своей жизни 🤗 1. мама 2. папа 3. молодой человек 4. русскоговорящая знакомая в офисе всё. даже моя сестра ничего не сказала, а, когда я прямо спросила её, как ей, сказала, что мы все равно не виделись 2 года, так что для неё вся я в новинку.. p.s. в инсте выложила рилс с новой прической!
custom 5429606679605973740137custom 54319036109359946722
а что выбрали бы вы?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
рабочее:: чтобы написать дизайн для моего следующего проекта, мне нужно поговорить с другой командой. мы будем использовать их продукт и хочется уточнить некоторые детали. у них есть официальные office hours, в которые можно забронировать слоты. доступные времена: 7 утра 12 ночи или 6 вечера, но 25 августа… 😔
custom 543189842261549899861custom 543190361093599467214
что-то вспомнила об этих гениальных перекусах в начальной школе после продленки: • кусочек булки с намазанной на него сгущенкой • черный хлеб посыпанный солью choose your fighter, как говорится. английские beans on toast даже рядом не стояли!
custom 542960667960597374059custom 543190361093599467214
несу угощение коллегам в офис 😊у нас в команде, если съездил на родину, принято привозить какие-нибудь национальные сладости со мной поездка в Россию случилась впервые с момента переезда, поэтому я долго ломала голову, что же им такое привезти советские шоколадные конфеты вряд ли их удивят, это для нас они представляют ностальгическую ценность (как и застревающие в зубах ириски) искала вишню в шоколаде, не нашла …
custom 542960667960597374077custom 54319036109359946725
наш рилс-коллаб с @darerror все еще кажется мне AI-сгенерированным
custom 542960667960597374068custom 543190361093599467214custom 54318984226154989989
✈️ моё путешествие в Россию началось с долгожданной встречи и критических проблем со связью я знала о том, что такое прекрасное достижение цивилизации, как Apple Pay, в России недоступно, но почему-то не связала этот факт с тем, что • мобильная связь отключается на первые 24 часа • у меня нет ни налички, ни физической карточки и вишенкой на торте — у меня нет российского номера телефона, поэтому ко многим вайфаям …
custom 542960667960597374079custom 54318984226154989986
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ancharts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
а что выбрали бы вы?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 139,444 of 1,603,893entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Аня в здесь и сейчас | О Лондоне, карьере в Google и стиле” (@ancharts), 4,845 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ancharts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.