Channel
@anb_111
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,122subscribers
+22 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001723632184 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anb_111 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anb_111 |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 2,122 | -2 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 19:38 | 2,124 | -1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 2,125 | -1 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 2,126 | +12 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:55 | 2,114 | +3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 2,111 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 2,114 | +8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 2,106 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:15 | 2,104 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 2,102 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 2,101 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 2,100 | no change |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 2,100 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
52 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 90.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 5.77% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Arrhythmias اهم ما في AF → irregularly irregular + no P Unstable AF → synchronized cardioversion Stable regular narrow SVT → vagal → adenosine Unstable VT with pulse → synchronized cardioversion Pulseless VT/VF → defibrillation + CPR Mobitz I → PR progressively longer Mobitz II → constant PR + dropped QRS Complete block → AV dissociation WPW → short PR + delta wave AF + WPW → avoid AV nodal blockers Torsad…
Posted without readable text
A 48-year-old woman develops constipation postoperatively and selfmedicates with milk of magnesia. She is noted to have an elevated serum magnesium level. Which of the following represents the earliest clinical indication of hypermagnesemia? a. Loss of deep tendon reflexes b. Flaccid paralysis c. Respiratory arrest d. Hypotension e. Stupor
Posted without readable text
Multiple ulcers with slough around ileostomy in IBD suggest: A. Erythema nodosum B. Pyoderma gangrenosum C. Cellulitis D. Behçet disease
Posted without readable text
An elderly patient on warfarin after minor trauma most likely develops: A. Epidural hematoma B. Subdural hematoma C. SAH D. Brain abscess
C
❤3
60-year-old woman in ICU with septic shock remains hypotensive despite fluids. Which drug is the first-line vasopressor? A. Dopamine B. Adrenaline C. Noradrenaline D. Vasopressin E. Dobutamine
❤5
Photo, posted without a caption
❤8
🚨 Exam Rule Acute dyspnoea + crackles + suspected heart failure ➡ First investigation = Chest X-ray
❤3
The best immediate investigation is: ⭐ Chest X-ray It helps identify: • Pulmonary edema • Cardiomegaly • Kerley B lines • Alveolar shadowing • Pleural effusion Typical findings in pulmonary edema: • Bat-wing perihilar shadowing • Cardiac enlargement
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @anb_111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كيسات باطنية 🩺 / اكاديمية البيت الطبي 🩺💊” (@anb_111), 2,122 subscribers as measured 16 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anb_111.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.