Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Анастасия О'Нил | здесь ты влюбишься в ИИ | Нейросети

Channel

Анастасия О'Нил | здесь ты влюбишься в ИИ | Нейросети

@anastasiaonileproai

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,030subscribers

-172 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002066253449
TypeChannel
Username@anastasiaonileproai
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/anastasiaonileproai

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,03010,20210,1167 August 2026 — 10,202 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,198 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,191 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,189 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,187 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,183 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,174 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,171 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,167 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,162 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,156 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,152 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,149 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,144 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,137 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,133 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,126 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,121 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,118 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,113 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,109 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,102 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,100 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,095 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,091 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,083 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,074 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,056 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,049 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,044 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,030 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 41 days, net -172. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,004–10,228 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:1510,030-14
15 Sept 2026, 09:1610,044-5
13 Sept 2026, 17:5610,049-7
11 Sept 2026, 21:5810,056-18
9 Sept 2026, 09:3510,074-9
6 Sept 2026, 02:1910,083-8
4 Sept 2026, 00:5510,091-4
2 Sept 2026, 18:0910,095-5
1 Sept 2026, 14:1410,100-2
31 Aug 2026, 11:4410,102-7
30 Aug 2026, 11:1310,109-4
29 Aug 2026, 10:4310,113-5
28 Aug 2026, 13:5410,118-3
27 Aug 2026, 10:2310,121-5
26 Aug 2026, 10:2410,126-7
25 Aug 2026, 09:4810,133-4
24 Aug 2026, 08:2310,137-7
22 Aug 2026, 18:3510,144-5
21 Aug 2026, 11:0510,149-3
20 Aug 2026, 12:4510,152first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 6 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

86 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4855.8%
🔥3439.5%
❤‍🔥22.33%
👍22.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 12 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Apr 2026, 14:51 UTC≈1,830 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Обои на телефон с твоим парнем в стиле Mr & Mrs Smith👠 Готовый промт + пошаговая инструкция 👁️‍🗨️ Промт: Чёрно-белая студийная фотография (красный только шрифт и розы) высокого качества на чистом белом фоне, без отвлекающих элементов. В кадре — я и мой парень, сняты в полный рост. Мы стоим спиной друг к другу, между нами заметное белое пространство, фигуры не соприкасаются, создаётся чистый визуальный разрыв. Полож…

❤8🔥5👍1

11 Apr 2026, 10:17 UTC≈1,520 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🏷️ Как создать такие живые цветочные Pinterest кадры с твоими фото за 1 минуту? 🌼 Я влюблена в этот тренд — и если честно, еще больше влюблена в мой промт [как бы нескромно это не звучало] ❤️ Потому что именно он даёт тот самый винтажно-ботанический результат: цветы не просто торчат со всех сторон, а обвивают, оплетают, живут на твоих фото Кстати, как идея, такой тренд можно повторить не только с личными фотками, …

❤10🔥1

9 Apr 2026, 09:42 UTC≈1,370 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Фото с тобой в детстве / сейчас на День Рождения 🎂 Готовый промт + пошаговая инструкция 👁️‍🗨️ 🤩Заходим в этот сервис через тг или через сайт [кому как удобно] 🤩Выбираем Nano Banana, Seedream или Chat GPT [я создала все эти фото в Nano Banana Pro. Формат 9:16] 🤩Первым фото отправляем твое фото сейчас [или лучше коллажик из 1 моего фото передом и 1 в боком] + вторым фото отправляем фото из детства 🤩После фото отпр…

🔥11❤10

6 Apr 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,130 views23 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Тебе для финального ролика нужно буквально 1–3 секунды с каждого видео-фрагмента 🔫А не все целиковые 5–8 секунд, которые генерит нейросеть То есть, ты берёшь лучший момент, а остальное просто отрезаешь И даже если генерация получилась не вся идеальная целиком – почти всегда есть кусок 1-3 сек, который идеальный! ✨ ⸻ 🤩Сборка финального ролика Дальше ты: — закидываешь всё эти видео-фрагменты в CapCut — можешь нал…

❤15🔥8

6 Apr 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,050 views17 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

🎬 Как из раскадровки и 1 промта сделать готовый ролик за 12 минут?👁️‍🗨️ ЧАСТЬ 2 В 1 ЧАСТИ из 1 фото и 1 промта мы сделали раскадровку сразу на 6–9 кадров А сегодня давай — улучшим качество этих кадров — оживим их в видео — и соберём готовый ролик 🎬 Всё пошагово показала в этой видео-инструкции: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWyvivdj8Dq/?igsh=bjFiY3J6eWQ1N3Yz а по кодовому слову в комментариях ты можешь бесплатно…

🔥9❤5❤‍🔥2👍1

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @anastasiaonileproai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анастасия О'Нил | здесь ты влюбишься в ИИ | Нейросети” (@anastasiaonileproai), 10,030 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anastasiaonileproai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.